Intel Core CPU Clock-for-Clock Benchmark Test



Today, we're taking a closer look at a clock-for-clock (IPC) test of Intel LGA 1700 processors. This manner we're comparing the 12th-gen, thirteenth-gen, and the "new" 14th-gen CPU models we lately reviewed. Our goal is to offer perception into the architectural enhancements – or the lack thereof – that Intel has added with each new CPU generation.

Right away, we are able to commentary how uncommon it's far that we have got 3 generations or collection of Intel's CPUs on the same platform. Historically, Intel has normally supported simplest collection, which was a staple in their tick-tock approach.

And at the same time as Intel has a strong track file of making CPUs that offer outstanding gaming overall performance, in addition they have a bad tune document for longer-term platform assist. By this, we suggest developers and gamers have end up accustomed to upgrading their perfectly proper motherboard whenever they need better CPU overall performance.

For many years, Intel's method went unchallenged, generally due to the fact they confronted no big opposition. For almost a decade before the release of Ryzen, AMD struggled. And even after Ryzen's introduction, it took a few iterations for it to benefit strong footing.

But now the landscape is extensively distinctive. Intel's been getting battered within the retail market, and even with the advent of the 14th-gen Raptor Lake-refresh CPUs, Intel's demanding situations appear to be mounting.

There are various motives for this shift. One major aspect, past the outstanding charge-to-performance ratio of many Ryzen processors, is platform guide. AM4's achievement is difficult to deny. Even while AMD attempted their satisfactory to debris it up through axing assist upfront, the fanatic network stored AMD from AMD'ing themselves, and within the process helped create what is one of the satisfactory CPU structures in history.

Recognizing the trend, AMD speedy announced complete platform guide for AM5. Yet, they have hinted at the opportunity of transitioning from the platform earlier than they did with AM4. It stays to be seen if AM5 will reflect AM4's fulfillment. But one thing is obvious: it has a brighter future than Intel's LGA 1700 platform, that's now effectively lifeless, in spite of the recent launch of the "new" 14th-gen fashions.

In many ways you can argue that LGA 1700's excessive point became the preliminary release of the 12th-gen Alder Lake structure in January 2022. The 13th-gen Raptor Lake replace did carry a few enhancements like elevated L2 and L3 cache capacities and heightened clock speeds. However, these were not sizeable sufficient to trap twelfth-gen owners.

In realistic phrases, twelfth-gen parts may be overclocked to mirror the frequencies of 13th-gen fashions, further blurring the distinction between the two. Given this, we chose to remove the clock velocity variable to evaluate the 12th, thirteenth, and 14th-gen K-SKU components at same frequencies.

For our checks, the E-cores have been disabled, the hoop bus locked at 3GHz, and all CPUs had been evaluated the usage of DDR5-7200 memory and the GeForce RTX 4090. Let's delve into the comparisons...

IPC Benchmarks

First up we've got the Cinebench multi-middle benchmark and here we discover just a three% growth from the 12900K to the 14900K when comparing clock-for-clock overall performance. The margin is slightly smaller for the Core i7's, just a 2% boom from the 12th to 14th-gen version after which a 1% boom for the 14600K over the 12600K.

The single middle profits are, well, 0. There's not anything to talk approximately right here, the cache benefits of the Raptor Lake structure aren't specially beneficial here, so we are looking at the same performance from the Core i5's to the Core i9's and the generation would not depend.

As we noticed with the Cinebench multi-center check, the use of Blender shows nearly no difference in overall performance between the Core i7-12700K and Core i9-14900K, as each CPUs % 8 P-cores, we're searching at an insignificant 2% distinction.

Now, with regards to gaming we are looking at comparable overall performance tendencies to what changed into seen in Blender and the Cinebench multi-core check. When operating at the equal clock speeds the 14900K is simply 3% quicker than the 12700K in Cyberpunk at 1080p with an RTX 4090.

Out of hobby, we recorded the common overall system strength consumption in the course of our benchmark skip and are reporting the three run common facts right here. For this testing voltages had been no longer managed, though all CPUs had been tested on the identical motherboard with the same BIOS revision.

It's pretty clear primarily based in this and past data that Raptor Lake is extra energy green than Alder Lake, though normal energy usage continues to be very terrible.

Next up we've got Starfield and here we are seeing only a five% growth from the Core i5-13600K to the Core i9-14900K and which means the 14900K became simply 3% quicker than the 12900K. We're additionally seeing just a 3% uplift from the 12700K to the 14700K, even though we did see a greater vast 6% boom from the 12600K to the 14600K.

The power consumption figures are just like what we noticed in Cyberpunk, the 14th-gen is typically a bit better than 13th-gen, both even though silicon exceptional or BIOS optimizations for 14th-gen, we have not appeared too closely at that yet. Both are an development over 12th-gen even though.

Then we've got Baldur's Gate three and here the 14900K changed into 6% faster than the 12900K and a pair of% quicker than the 13900K. Now the 14900K and 13900K are the equal product, but the 14th-gen model turned into continuously faster on this test, so there may be a few kind of optimization taking location at the BIOS level with a purpose to require in addition investigation. Still the profits for the 14th-gen parts over the older 12th-gen models isn't exactly great.

Here's the Baldur's Gate three total machine strength intake figures and again they're quite similar to what we saw in Starfield and Cyberpunk, suggesting that a few voltage optimization work has been achieved with every era.

What We Learned

So there you have it, no longer much progress from Intel during the last 2 years, even though they've delivered 3 new CPU generations. This isn't always a tremendous trouble for Intel as they stay aggressive in phrases of overall performance. In truth, they frequently surpass AMD, although with the alternate-off of much better strength consumption.

A more urgent issue for Intel is probably their inconsistent platform dedication. This inconsistency has in all likelihood been unfavourable for some time, leading to neglected income possibilities. For instance, if you invested in a twelfth-gen thing like the Core i7-12700K, your upgrade direction appears limited. The 14900K offers handiest a slight overall performance enhance, presenting a minimal upgrade relative to the considerable economic investment.

In the pleasant-case situation, Intel's fifteenth generation might offer a noteworthy overall performance improvement, prompting an upgrade, but this will require a new motherboard. Quality Intel Z790 forums start at $200, so if repurposing or selling the device isn't viable, upgrading turns into a steeply-priced proposition.

This isn't a really perfect situation for Intel's customers. While some might argue that not all and sundry enhancements with each new era, that misses the wider difficulty. No enthusiast or purchaser should be defending Intel's negative platform support, you are just taking pictures yourself within the foot and making the PC platform worse for absolutely everyone else in the manner. This is without question the worst aspect of the PC fanatic crowd and we see this illogical corporate simping for not just for Intel however also with AMD and Nvidia.

It's really worth noting that folks that spend money on top rate merchandise, just like the Core i9, are extra willing to improve often, given there's a meaningful overall performance advantage. Not from 13900K to 14900K, however jumping from a 10900K or 11900K to 13900K is a potential flow, even though it needs a motherboard change.

It's lots like RTX 4090 customers, many of them will purchase the RTX 5090 while it comes out. But those who purchased the RTX 4070 or a extra low priced alternative will typically wait a few generations before upgrading.

And this is precisely who's affected by restrained platform assist: mid-variety to access-degree users – price range users if you may. There's no cause why Intel could not have skipped LGA 1200 for 1700, releasing tenth and 11th-gen on the bigger socket. Imagine if folks that purchased a Core i5-10600K lower back in 2020 have been afforded the capacity to upgrade to a 13600K today, while not having to buy a brand new motherboard, and primarily based on our day-one evaluation facts for the 13600K the usage of DDR4, it provided 50% extra gaming overall performance whilst basically CPU confined, or almost 170% more processing electricity for middle-heavy packages.

That's a huge performance uplift and had Intel been capable of offer it even as retaining platform compatibility, it'd have significantly benefited both themselves and their clients.

Therefore, it's our opinion that Intel desires to guide their next platform for at least 4 generations, and by way of generations we suggest actual generations, no instantly refreshes. Ideally, additionally they want to make a great step forward from Raptor Lake to justify the socket alternate and any related compatibility issues.

On the whole, LGA 1700 offers a combined bag from Intel. While it addresses sure challenges the company confronted, it overlooks others or even introduces new troubles. For example, introducing E-Cores stepped forward subpar productiveness performance from earlier generations, however they've endured to disregard stuff like poor platform guide even as developing new problems which include excessive energy usage.

While AMD's AM5 platform is not best, its proper capacity stays to be visible. It might take a few extra years to decide whether or no longer it's every other fulfillment.

Shopping Shortcuts:

• Intel Core i9-14900K on Amazon
• Intel Core i7-14700K on Amazon
• Intel Core i5-14600K on Amazon
• AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D on Amazon
• AMD Ryzen nine 7900X on Amazon
• AMD Ryzen nine 7950X on Amazon
• AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D on Amazon

.SubDriveRevBot margin: 30px zero 0px; border-radius: 3px; line-height: 1.Five; font-length: 0.9em; shade: ssharppfff; history-coloration: ssharpp1d4d84; cursor: pointer; heritage-repeat: no-repeat; history-size: incorporate; background-position: right; .SubDriveRevBot:hover background-shade: ssharpp245996; transition: zero.4s linear; .SubDriveRevBot a coloration: ssharppfff; show: block; width: 100%; peak: one hundred%; .SubDriveRevBot a:hover shade: ssharppfff; .SubDriveRevBot .Titlerr history: rgba(30, 41, fifty one, zero.Sixty three); padding: 10px 20px 7px; color: ssharppfff; letter-spacing: -0.1px; show: block; border-radius: 3px; font-length: zero.9em; .SubDriveRevBot .Observation font-weight: 500; shade: ssharppf29f26; font-circle of relatives: Roboto; .SubDriveRevBot .Remarknew font-weight: 500; shade: ssharppfea; font-family: Roboto; .SubDriveRevBot .Bulll margin-bottom: 5px !Vital; padding: 15px 5px If you enjoy our content material, please do not forget subscribing.

• Ad-loose TechSpot revel in at the same time as supporting our work
• Our promise: All reader contributions will cross closer to investment more content
• That means: More tech capabilities, extra benchmarks and evaluation