AMD's today's Radeon is the RX 7600 XT: double the VRAM for $330

TL;DR: AMD is also launching a pictures card in January, the Radeon RX 7600 XT, priced at $330. This product is easy: it's a Radeon RX 7600 with 16GB of reminiscence – doubling the VRAM – and a slight overclock. This places the two 7600 GPUs much nearer in performance than the distinction determined between the Radeon RX 6600 and RX 6600 XT inside the previous technology, which had one of a kind center configurations.

AMD claims full-size overall performance improvements transferring from the 7600 to the 7600 XT, with a chart showing will increase ranging from 7 to forty percent at 1080p, and thirteen to 45 percent at 1440p. The larger upgrades could be manageable if VRAM capability is a limiting thing at the 8GB version, particularly given the high memory necessities for Ultra setting gaming in lots of cutting-edge games.

However, we're much less certain approximately the overall performance profits in games that aren't heavily VRAM confined, along with Starfield. The profits there appear better than anticipated based on the hardware variations among the playing cards, necessitating further benchmarking.

The RX 7600 XT keeps to utilize a totally unlocked Navi 33 die with 32 compute units and a pair of,048 circulation processors. AMD claims a 10% higher sport clock for the XT version in comparison to the non-XT, at the side of 16GB of GDDR6 at the same 18 Gbps at the identical 128-bit bus, doubling the potential even as maintaining the identical reminiscence bandwidth. The card's board energy rating has elevated from 165W to 190W to house these changes, marking a fifteen% boom.

We are truly disappointed with the aid of AMD's chart, which compares performance both with and with out various functions enabled. There's no problem with the baseline numbers comparing the 7600 XT against the RTX 4060, or for equivalent comparisons like FSR 3 enabled on both GPUs in Avatar Frontiers of Pandora or Like a Dragon Gaiden. AMD shows the 7600 XT competing closely with the RTX 4060 in these situations.

What seems misleading, in our opinion, are the comparisons where AMD applies their motive force-primarily based AFMF body era feature to "beat" the GeForce GPU in the listed output frame charge. These capabilities do not supply equal photo quality, particularly when comparing DLSS 2 Quality mode without body technology to FSR 2 Quality mode with AFMF frame era. Based on our assessments, AFMF does not produce photo satisfactory comparable to other configurations on this chart. Yet, by means of comparing them as equivalent, AMD can present a vast overall performance "win" with the brand new 7600 XT.

It's no longer remarkable while Nvidia compares RTX 40 GPUs to RTX 30 GPUs and shows the new 40 series playing cards having a "performance win" through DLSS three body generation – we've drastically explained why frame generation isn't always a performance-improving technology. They are also responsible of this with the Super series records, despite the fact that, to their credit, they did offer different greater relevant numbers that failed to include frame era FPS.

The extra agencies pursue the best FPS number via software program features (upscaling, frame generation, and so on.) with out considering picture pleasant, the worse those comparisons emerge as, and the extra useless or misleading the statistics is for clients.

With AMD's numbers, the state of affairs is even worse due to the fact they are directly comparing Radeon with GeForce – some thing Nvidia handiest does with their personal products. Moreover, the difference in picture satisfactory between AFMF and primary upscaling or native is much large than that of DLSS 3 frame technology. The greater companies pursue the best FPS quantity via software program capabilities with out considering image great, the worse these comparisons emerge as, and the extra useless or misleading the information is for customers. At least AMD did provide native apples-to-apples numbers for a proper comparison.

On a extra nice be aware, AMD claims to have stepped forward encoding image great through fee manipulate optimizations inside the modern model of their SDK. This has been implemented within the brand new version of Radeon Software 24.1 and applies to H.264, HEVC, and AV1 encoding. Streaming photograph exceptional on Radeon GPUs, specifically with H.264, has been criticized for a while now, so it is encouraging to look AMD operating in this. Third-celebration apps will need to update to the contemporary version of the AMF SDK to gain from those improvements, however the possibilities look promising.

The charge of the Radeon 7600 XT would not seem notable, with the MSRP $60 better than the RX 7600 for a minor clock growth and double the VRAM. Real-international pricing could be as a great deal as $eighty better, given that we have seen the 7600 fall to $250 at instances, and the 7600 is not a very priced product to begin with.

We give some credit to AMD for making their maximum low priced 16GB snap shots card yet and offering more VRAM inside the sub-$350 price tier, however it feels a bit expensive relative to the RX 7600. It's priced similarly to the still-available RX 6700 XT with 12GB of VRAM, which may be discovered for $320. The 6700 XT is likely quicker, so it will be interesting to look where it ranks in Steve's benchmarks.

Our preliminary feeling is that AMD may also have ignored an possibility to exert tremendous strain at the RTX 4060. The Radeon RX 7600 (non-XT) and GeForce RTX 4060 provide comparable overall performance, so if AMD may want to offer a moderate performance advantage as well as double the VRAM at the equal $300 rate because the RTX 4060, that would be quite compelling. However, at $330, we are but to be convinced.