Intel's powerhouse 144-core Xeon CPU preliminary benchmarks show overall performance trails at the back of AMD's 128-core Epyc



In the excessive-stakes opposition for the pleasant server CPUs, Intel's state-of-the-art access, the "Sierra Forest" Xeon with a whopping 144 cores is quite the show. However, it's now not pretty much the range of cores, but how you use them, and here AMD's 128-middle Epyc Bergamo is still preserving all the aces.

Intel's Xeon Sierra Forest, an upcoming server chip with up to a hundred and forty four efficiency cores, has recently surfaced on Geekbench 6, revealing its multi-center prowess. Set to release in a count of weeks, it's ready to rumble with AMD's Zen 4c Bergamo server CPUs and Arm-primarily based server chips.

The take a look at indicates off a dual-socket setup, with 144-middle CPUs, efficaciously creating a 288-middle device. However, it is vital to observe that Geekbench recorded this as two separate one hundred forty four-middle CPUs. Intel's ambition does not prevent there, as they've also introduced a mind-blowing 288-core version of Sierra Forest, promising even greater power and performance

The cutting-edge Xeon's overall performance with a multi-center rating of 7,770 is quite staggering, specially while you compare it to Intel's personal Xeon Platinum 8480 , which commonly rankings between 6,500 and 7,500. However, its unmarried-core overall performance of 855 falls short when compared to AMD's Epyc 9754. This is due to the fact the Sierra Forest's 144 Glen E-cores are purposefully designed for performance in place of velocity, in contrast to the Xeon 8480 's fifty six Golden Cove overall performance cores.

Feature Intel Xeon
(one hundred forty four-middle Sierra Forest) AMD Epyc 9754
(128-middle Bergamo) Core Count one hundred forty four 128 Thread Count one hundred forty four (Efficiency Cores) 256 (Zen 4c Cores) Single-Core Score 855 1,597 Multi-Core Score 7,770 16,455 Architecture Glen E-Core Zen 4c Base Clock Speed 2.20 GHz Varies (Depends on precise SKU) L3 Cache 108 MB 256 MB L2 Cache sixty four MB 128 MB Efficiency Focus High Moderate Expected Release First 1/2 of 2024 Already to be had

For its element, AMD's 128-middle Bergamo CPU has already set a high popular within the server CPU marketplace with a multi-center score of 16,455. The Zen 4c cores are architecturally equal to Zen 4 but are greater region and strength-efficient.

Bergamo additionally suggests a multi-center score that extensively outperforms each Sierra Forest and Sapphire Rapids. AMD is not just pushing boundaries with Bergamo, however setting new milestones within the AI space with their Instinct MI300X, which combines CPU and GPU.

It's applicable to recollect that the Sierra Forest result comes from a pre-launch chip, which might not replicate its full ability though. Additionally, Sierra Forest may actually have a few special capabilities that Geekbench did not catch, similar to how Intel's Sapphire Rapids changed into chosen for Microsoft Azure over AMD's MI300X GPUs due to its AI-accelerated instructions.

The benchmark does element Sierra Forest's cache configuration, reporting 108MB of L3 cache. While the L2 cache count number is uncertain, Sierra Forest probable has a complete of 144MB of L2 cache in keeping with CPU, combined with the L3 cache, making up for a total of 252MB. This is still smaller than Bergamo's L3 cache, that is 256MB.

In practical phrases, deciding on between Intel's Sierra Forest and AMD's Bergamo CPUs will in the long run rely on specific server needs. Sierra Forest, with its cognizance on efficiency and multi-center overall performance, is like a fleet of electrical cars. It may not be the quickest on the road, but probably green for the lengthy haul. On the other hand, AMD's Bergamo, with its higher middle rely and large cache, is a power-packed SUV, capable of dealing with all terrains.