Last updated 13 month ago
The Upgrade Path: AMD Ryzen 3700X to 5800X3D vs. Intel Core i9-9900K
Today, we're following up with our checking out from ultimate week, which in comparison AMD's Ryzen 7 3700X with the Core i9-9900K. Both CPUs acquired our advice again inside the day – the 9900K as an uncompromising pinnacle-tier gaming CPU, and the 3700X for its amazing price, not simply in gaming however also in middle-heavy productivity tasks. It in reality was an wonderful all-rounder for those on a budget.
Given that, those CPUs weren't definitely in direct competition; on the time, AMD had no direct rival to the Core i9 in gaming. Nevertheless, for most game enthusiasts, we counseled the 3700X or, ideally, the more low priced Ryzen five 3600 instead, as they were not simplest significantly much less costly, but the AM4 platform they required become set to guide a destiny era of CPUs. In assessment, Intel's LGA1151 platform became efficaciously lifeless, with the 9900K being the give up of the street.
Recently, a reader published a query: How do the 3700X and 9900K examine these days, and how does the 9900K stack up against the 5800X3D?
It's an thrilling query and a super evaluation to appearance again on.
On one hand, one ought to have invested $600 at the Core i9-9900K for the exceptional gaming performance 2018/2019 needed to provide, or, instead, spend 1/2 that quantity, now and again even much less, on the 3700X.
Despite the big fee difference, the 3700X wasn't an awful lot slower in gaming and always brought pretty playable performance, making it an apparent desire for plenty.
Unforeseen on the time become that purchasing the 3700X in 2019 – or truly any AM4 processor up to that factor – might will let you improve to the 5800X3D a few three years later the usage of the same motherboard, for $450, which isn't dust reasonably-priced, however became nonetheless less highly-priced than the 9900K.
Moreover, if you may wait longer, a few five months after launch, the 5800X3D's charge dropped to $330, the original price of the 3700X.
At the same time, Intel's Core i7-12700KF turned into retailing for $380, and to improve, 9900K owners might require a brand new Z690 motherboard, with respectable alternatives priced round $two hundred, bringing the entire improve value to approximately $580 (assuming you stuck with your current DDR4 reminiscence). However, the usage of DDR4 commonly resulted inside the 12700KF acting slower than the 5800X3D, so the platform improve would not always net you additional overall performance.
Of direction, in case you opted for a Core i9-12900K at $620, a $200 Z690 motherboard, and shall we embrace, extravagantly, $150 for DDR5 memory, that might amount to $970. Those willing to sell off $1,000 on platform improvements every few years don't care about cost, that is the camp most unique 9900K proprietors could have been in, so this isn't to say 9900K customers did it incorrect, it is just a appearance lower back at how the various options have performed out.
Where the "you did it wrong" debates would possibly emerge is while evaluating the Ryzen five 3600 and Ryzen 7 3700X in opposition to the extra cheap 9th-gen Core collection elements. But perhaps this is a discussion for yet again.
So, now in late 2023, with a greater effective GPU like the RTX 4090 and a slew of latest titles, how do the 5800X3D and 9900K evaluate? Both CPUs had been paired with 32GB of twin-rank DDR4-3600 CL14 reminiscence, the trendy BIOS updates had been implemented, and we are, of direction, running Windows 11. Let's delve into it…
Benchmarks
Starting with Assassin's Creed Mirage, we previously located that this was one of the few titles in which the 3700X and 9900K were very comparable, usually turning in among a hundred and ten-120 fps. Now, pretty remarkably, we're searching at a big 56% performance uplift from the Core i9 to the 5800X3D, because the three-D V-Cache component propelled the RTX 4090 to 184 fps.
Even at 1440p, we're staring at a 52% increase in performance, with the 5800X3D delivering a absolutely high-refresh-rate experience. Then at 4K, we are nonetheless seeing a 21% boom, rendering 132 fps, marking a great development normal from the 5800X3D.
These results additionally highlight why the usage of an RTX 4090 to check the 9900K and 3700X isn't an trouble as many inexperienced PC customers may claim. This is due to the fact the results are closely CPU-restricted, that's the factor, and for that reason we might see similar results from those older CPUs the usage of a miles slower GPU. However, a slower GPU would obscure any improvement supplied by the quicker 5800X3D, which could absolutely negate the purpose of a CPU performance research.
Cyberpunk became a much greater favorable identify for the 9900K, as here it is a tremendous 27% faster than the 3700X, that's advantageous for the Core i9. However, 3700X users who upgrade to the 5800X3D will see a good sized 31% performance growth over the 9900K, imparting a real excessive-refresh-price experience in Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty with 142 fps at 1080p and 141 fps at 1440p.
Next up, we've Horizon Zero Dawn, wherein the 9900K was as much as 11% quicker than the 3700X. However, the 5800X3D became a widespread 28% faster than the 9900K, showing that the AM4 platform had greater longevity than Intel's LGA1151. Even at 1440p, we're searching at as much as 27% extra performance and then a extra modest 12% gain at 4K.
The Far Cry 6 consequences are much like those seen in Assassin's Creed Mirage, in that the 3700X and 9900K are very competitive. However, the 5800X3D some distance surpasses the 9900K, turning in 50% extra overall performance at 1080p and 1440p, and was even as much as 22% quicker at 4K.
Moving on to F1 23, that is a identify in which the 9900K performed very well relative to the 3700X, providing a significant 28% overall performance raise at 1080p, accomplishing a hundred and seventy fps – a totally spectacular result for the older i9. However, the 5800X3D without difficulty outperforms the 9900K, imparting a further 28% in overall performance, attaining 218 fps on average, that's a sixty one% growth over the 3700X.
For Assetto Corsa Competizione, the 9900K become restrained to 111 fps, which changed into quite marvelous in comparison to the 3700X, marking it 23% quicker, even though it did fee nearly two times as a great deal. Yet, whilst the 5800X3D is delivered into the assessment, it's miles an extraordinary fifty eight% quicker, taking into account one hundred seventy five fps on average, and even at 4K, it become nevertheless fifty one% faster.
When testing with Watch Dogs: Legion, both the 9900K and 3700X fell quick of 100 fps. However, with the 5800X3D set up, we are now seeing an almost 60% overall performance increase, hitting one hundred fifty five fps on common at 1080p, after which a 60% growth at 1440p. Even at 4K, the 5800X3D was still 26% faster than the 9900K.
Next, we've got A Plague Tale: Requiem, where the 9900K is 21% quicker than the 3700X, marking a widespread performance uplift. However, it's now not as great because the 32% overall performance gain the 5800X3D enjoys over the 9900K. Then at 1440p, the 5800X3D became 30% faster than the 9900K, although that margin reduced to simply 5% at the GPU-restrained 4K resolution.
The 9900K turned into extensively faster than the 3700X in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor, turning in 22% extra frames at 1080p, and the 5800X3D advanced upon that by using a in addition 35%, averaging 140 fps. At 1440p, the 5800X3D become 34% faster than the 9900K, though we grow to be closely GPU-restricted at 4K.
Like Watch Dogs: Legion, Baldur's Gate 3 is any other game in which the older 3700X and 9900K were unable to hit a hundred fps, regardless of the RTX 4090's talents. With the 5800X3D mounted, performance changed into boosted to over one hundred forty fps, a substantial 54% boom over the 9900K.
The 3700X and 9900K added comparable performance in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II, but the 5800X3D turned into still 36% quicker than the 9900K at 1080p, 11% faster at 1440p, and six% faster at 4K.
Resident Evil four is every other name where the older CPUs fell brief of a hundred fps, meaning the 5800X3D was 54% quicker than the 9900K at 1080p, fifty one% quicker at 1440p, and an outstanding 33% quicker at 4K.
Shadow of the Tomb Raider, even as an older identify, stays CPU-disturbing. Both the 3700X and 9900K completed nicely, with the Intel CPU 16% quicker, averaging 159 fps at 1080p. However, the 5800X3D become a powerhouse, producing 269 fps, an nearly 70% growth over the 9900K, underscoring the AM4 platform's capabilities.
The Callisto Protocol, a far more moderen identify, confirmed similar margins to Tomb Raider. At 1080p, the 9900K changed into 16% quicker than the 3700X, however the 5800X3D was 41% quicker than the 9900K – a huge margin, although now not as large as in Shadow of the Tomb Raider.
In Total War: Warhammer III, the 9900K was just 7% quicker than the 3700X at 1080p, with each CPUs turning in first rate overall performance. Still, the 5800X3D was 47% faster than the 9900K, outputting 253 fps on common.
Hogwarts Legacy failed to carry out nicely at the 3700X, and the 9900K did not fare much higher, averaging just 46 fps. Nevertheless, the 9900K became 15% faster than the 3700X, and the 5800X3D's 30% performance enhance changed into considerable, making 60 fps manageable and substantially improving the gaming experience.
In Starfield, the overall performance profits had been modest, with the 5800X3D being just thirteen% quicker than the 9900K, a decent development but now not as massive as the forty% profits we've got visible in other titles.
For The Last of Us, the 9900K changed into 15% quicker than the 3700X at 1080p, bearing in mind a mean of 114 fps. The 5800X3D controlled an average of 139 fps, making it 22% quicker than the 9900K, contributing to a better excessive-refresh-fee experience.
Both the 3700X and 9900K delivered notably playable overall performance in Halo Infinite, with the Intel CPU approximately 12% faster at 1080p and 1440p. The 5800X3D eclipsed those effects with a median of 215 fps, making it forty two% faster than the 9900K at 1080p and 33% quicker at 1440p.
In Hitman three, the 3700X and 9900K were intently matched, with just a 5% overall performance advantage for the Intel processor. Nevertheless, the 5800X3D excelled, averaging 195 fps at 1080p, a 35% boom over the 9900K.
Finally, in Spider-Man Remastered, the 9900K appreciably outperformed the 3700X, providing 26% extra performance at 1080p, averaging one hundred ten fps. Yet, the 5800X3D surpassed that, imparting a 31% increase and attaining a hundred and forty four fps on common, delivering a advanced excessive-refresh-rate revel in.
Performance Summary
So we've got tested the 21 games examined, and it appears quite clear that the 5800X3D offers AM4 proprietors a big improve over something just like the 3700X, and it's far appreciably faster than the 9900K. But allow's decide precisely how lots quicker it became throughout the video games tested, starting with the 1080p facts.
At 1080p, using the RTX 4090, we located that the 5800X3D become, on average, 41% quicker than the Core i9-9900K, that's a super performance distinction. In reality, in the least amazing case, the 5800X3D changed into 21% faster, and there are 7 examples in which it was over 50% faster.
Even at 1440p, the 5800X3D was, on common, 35% quicker than the 9900K, with the full-size majority of titles seeing a 20% advantage or extra, and again, there have been 7 games wherein the 5800X3D changed into extra than 50% quicker.
Finally, at 4K, the 5800X3D was sixteen% quicker than the 9900K. It's important to observe that, on average, the 3700X turned into simply thirteen% slower than the 9900K at 1080p.
What We Learned
As we've stated from the start, we don't accept as true with there was always a proper or wrong way to approach these purchases. If you desired the best of the satisfactory lower back in 2018 and will have the funds for the 9900K, then it might have made sense to achieve this. Hopefully, your budget failed to take successful over the years and by the time more processing strength turned into needed, something just like the 12900K or perhaps the 7800X3D become inside reach.
On the alternative hand, if you wanted strong gaming overall performance with fantastically playable body charges in all your favorite games, then the greater cheap Ryzen processors supplied extremely good cost. In fact, the actual value of Ryzen turned into not completely found out till the release of the 5000 collection, in particular the 3-D V-Cache model, as the 5800X3D proved to be enormously aggressive, particularly at the $330 charge point that it has commonly maintained.
The fee of AM4 is undeniable; upgrading from the 3700X to the 5800X3D turned into a short and simple technique, with the overall funding amounting to barely extra than the initial charge of the 9900K, even though you may have sold the 3700X to recoup a number of the cost. All matters taken into consideration, through 2023, for roughly the same economic outlay, the AM4 platform is presenting an average of forty% more overall performance while CPU-restrained, in keeping with our most recent trying out. We reckon this is pretty wonderful.
Let us recognise what you consider the AM4 improve path. Would you like to peer AMD reflect this achievement with AM5? Do you think Intel needs to support extra generations at the equal socket?
And which platform might you have got invested in, knowing what you understand now? Be certain to allow us to understand inside the comment segment under, and we will test out your remarks. For now, we are completed with this one, and we are hoping you loved the appearance back.
Shopping Shortcuts:
- AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D on Amazon
- AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D on Amazon
- AMD Ryzen nine 7900X on Amazon
- AMD Ryzen 9 7950X on Amazon
- AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D on Amazon
- Intel Core i5-14600K on Amazon
- Intel Core i7-14700K on Amazon
- Intel Core i9-14900K on Amazon
- Ad-free TechSpot enjoy while helping our work
- Our promise: All reader contributions will cross closer to funding extra content material
- That method: More tech capabilities, extra benchmarks and analysis
US cyberdefense businesses NSA and CISA divulge pinnacle 10 safety misconfigurations
A warm potato: US intelligence business enterprise NSA and America's Cyber Defense Agency, CISA, have launched a new joint advisory on pressing cyber-security topics. The two corporations are highlighting what's incorre...
Last updated 14 month ago
Intel boss Pat Gelsinger calls Arm's PC danger "insignificant"
Claims that the x86 architecture can be under risk from Arm-primarily based processors had been disregarded by using Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger. His statements follow reviews that Nvidia and AMD are planning to launch Arm...
Last updated 14 month ago
Mozilla pivots in the direction of AI destiny as Firefox market share declines
In a nutshell: Mozilla is outwardly on a journey to change the net again, but it will now not get there with Firefox. The open-source browser is slightly mentioned in the course of the corporation's contemporary company...
Last updated 11 month ago
Samsung shows off glasses-unfastened 3-d reveal concept that could right away transfer to 2D
The CES 2024 alternate display will see a lot of new tech toys, including PC peripherals, laptop hardware, TVs, and extra. Companies like LG, Asus, and Alienware also are showcasing modern video display units for gamer...
Last updated 11 month ago
Tor Browser thirteen brings a ton of enhancements to the privacy-first browser
Tor is a community of digital tunnels that permits human beings and groups to improve their privateness and protection at the Internet. It additionally allows software program developers to create new verbal exchange to...
Last updated 14 month ago
Tim Cook confirms succession plan, commits to final as Apple CEO for foreseeable future
Tim Cook is one of those rare sorts: a CEO who no longer handiest does a terrific job however is likewise favored by most of his employees and the general public. So, it shouldn't be unexpected to research that the App...
Last updated 13 month ago