Intel Core i9-14900K, i7-14700K and i5-14600K Review



Intel is launching these days their present day-gen Core laptop CPUs with 3 new models: the Core i9-14900K, Core i7-14700K, and Core i5-14600K, all sound familiar and you probably know to an quantity what to expect. We have all three on hand for trying out today. Now, you is probably thinking what Intel's new 14th generation CPUs must offer. What makes this "generation" one of a kind to the previous technology. So as a long way as we are able to tell, almost nothing.

This isn't a large marvel although. We've regarded for some time that the 14th-gen Core were going to be a Raptor Lake Refresh, so in different words an replace of the previous technology, and this time round meaning essentially the exact equal chip with a bump in clock frequencies. There's no IPC improvement here, no actual tweaks to the silicon, it's a pretty sincere refresh.

The largest change may be visible while looking at the Core i7-14700K which now has an additional cluster of E-cores, taking the full to twelve. The Core i5 nonetheless has eight E-cores and the Core i9 sixteen E-cores, even though they are now clocking 100 MHz better for the rapid.

What makes this "era" extraordinary to the previous generation? As some distance as we are able to tell, almost nothing.

On paper then the important thing highlights for the Core i9-14900K encompass a three% increase to the height Turbo frequency and a 2% frequency boom for the E-cores. The 14600K receives a 4% frequency bump for the P-middle Turbo and a 2.Five% increase for the E-cores. And it's about it.

Actually, Intel is likewise claiming some software program optimization for the 14th-gen series, which for reasons that almost really won't make sense, are not available for 12th and 13th-gen owners. What the chipmaker is asking "Intel Application Optimization" is a new coverage inside Intel's Dynamic Tuning Technology that optimizes overall performance for select games by means of directing utility resources in real-time. As an example, Intel claims this ends in a thirteen% uplift in Rainbow Six Siege and a sixteen% uplift for Metro Exodus.

As it stands right now, Rainbow Six Siege and Metro Exodus are the simplest games supported via this new characteristic, though Intel says they're operating with developers to add additional titles. The Intel Application Optimization will preload via the Intel Dynamic Tuning driver on motherboards which have DTT enabled in BIOS. But given the very restricted aid for this, we might not be testing it today as neither of these video games are covered in our pattern of benchmarks.

In brief, this is Intel's try and steal back the gaming performance crown from AMD, and that appears to be the primary consciousness of the 14th-gen series, outside of the Core i7 getting a few more E-Cores.

For checking out, we are the usage of an Asus ROG Strix RTX 4090 pics card going for walks Game Ready Driver model 644.43. All the benchmark information on this evaluate is clean, recorded in the final week, updated using the present day BIOS revisions, Windows eleven release, drivers, and so forth. The LGA1700 processors were examined the usage of DDR5-7200 CL34 memory and the AM5 processors with DDR5-6000 CL30 reminiscence. Let's get into the testing…

Application Benchmarks

Starting with the Cinebench multi-center take a look at, we find precisely what we have been watching for based at the paper spec. The 14900K is equal to the 13900K as both throttle to the equal frequency after 10 mins of load. The 14700K offers a 19% improve over the 13700K because of a 50% boom in E-Cores, bringing it tons closer to AMD's 7950X.

Next, we take a look at that the 14600K is 7% faster than the 13600K in this test. The slight growth in clock speeds facilitates here, as this model does not thermal throttle the use of a 360mm AIO, that is a fantastic.

However, the electricity intake raises worries. We'll delve into strength usage at some stage in gaming later, but we determined to document the average strength usage for the CPUs protected on this overview. The results are surprising: the 14900K averages a complete system consumption of 533 watts, almost 50% more than the 7950X for similar performance and nearly double the power of the 7950X3D with a ninety two% growth for just five% extra overall performance.

The 14700K isn't a great deal higher, with total system usage averaging 471 watts, representing a 70% increase over the 7950X3D for 6% much less overall performance. Meanwhile, the 14600K system consumes 310 watts, making it highly green compared to the 7700X, as it makes use of 17% extra strength for almost 30% extended overall performance.

For unmarried core performance, there's a modest 2% growth for the 14900K over the 13900K. The 14700K is four% faster than the 13700K, and the 14600K is three% faster than the 13600K, aligning with expectations based on clock speeds.

The Blender Open Data benchmark aligns with our Cinebench findings. The performance of the 14900K matches the 13900K. The 14700K, with its extra E-cores, is 24% quicker than the 13700K. This is the most effective widespread improvement, because the 14600K is most effective 6% faster than the 13600K.

In 7-zip compression, the Core i9's and Core i5's display almost same overall performance, even as the 14700K is 17% quicker than the 13700K.

Decompression consequences reflect the compression findings: the 14900K is 3% faster than the 13900K, the 14600K is 7% quicker than the 13600K, and the 14700K is 23% faster than the 13700K, attributed to the addition of 4 extra E-Cores.

After Effects gives the 14900K a 6% area over the 13900K. The 14600K is four% quicker than the 13600K, and the 14700K is 3% quicker than the 13700K considering that E-cores do not make a distinction here.

In Photoshop, which especially utilizes P-cores, the 14900K is 4% faster than the 13900K. The i7 outpaces its predecessor by 6%, and the i5 by using 7%.

In Premiere Pro, the 14900K is three% faster than the 13900K, and the 14700K is 6% faster than the 13700K. The Core i5 overall performance is also modest, with just a 3% improvement over the 13th gen version.

Our final software test is a browser benchmark, reflecting extra wellknown utilization. The outcomes are constant: the 14th gen i9 gives a three% growth, five% for the i7, and 7% for the i5.

Gaming Benchmarks

Starting with the gaming benchmarks, we begin with Factorio. The FactorioBox is a normally used Factorio benchmark and the model we've formerly applied. However, we've been informed that this could now not be the maximum representative take a look at, because it's based totally on a small map and won't correctly mirror overall performance, specially for large maps. Because of its length, it suits properly within the 3-D V-Cache for CPUs just like the 7800X3D, 7950X3D, and 5800X3D. Yet, dual CCD elements just like the 7950X3D have some issues right here. In our exams, the 7800X3D turned into nearly 50% faster than the 14900K. Due to potential inaccuracies with this test, we decided to re-examine the usage of a bigger map.

Testing on the bigger map appreciably altered our findings. Now, the 14900K and 13900K top the charts, narrowly outperforming the 7800X3D by means of a margin of 2%. Comparing the 13th and 14th gen fashions, we located virtually same performance.

Transitioning to fps metrics, we start with Baldur's Gate three, benchmarked within the CPU-intensive town of Baldur's Gate. The 14th gen fashions showed minimum upgrades over the 13th gen models, a maximum of three% in our assessments.

This poses challenges for Intel because the Zen 4 3D V-Cache models are over 15% quicker, with the 7950X3D being 17% faster than the 14900K.

During these assessments, we monitored common overall gadget power intake. Notably, in spite of its 17% pace benefit, the 7950X3D decreased power consumption by using 15%, marking it as greater efficient than the 14900K.

For Hogwarts Legacy, with ultra ray tracing enabled, the 7950X3D outpaced the 14900K by means of four%, at the same time as the 7800X3D was 6% quicker. Relative to the 13900K, the 14900K showed a 5% overall performance growth, a comparable trend located among the 14700K and 14600K and their predecessors.

Power consumption remains a issue for Intel. Even though it's marginally slower than the 7950X3D, the 14900K increased overall machine power intake via a enormous 21%.

Although Starfield is an AMD-sponsored title, it completed impressively on Intel processors. In our assessments, the 14900K became a notable 17% quicker than the 7950X3D, even though it confirmed no overall performance profits over the 13900K. Interestingly, the 14700K outperformed the 13700K by using 8%, however the 14600K showed no tangible enhancements over the 13600K.

From a energy perspective, even though the 14900K became 17% quicker than the 7950X3D, it drove total device utilization up by using forty%, highlighting that the 3D V-Cache model remains more efficient.

With Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty, the 3-D V-Cache processors continually shone. The 7800X3D handed the 14900K through 10%, and the 7950X3D by means of 7%. Unfortunately, when in comparison with their thirteenth gen opposite numbers, the 14900K and 14700K yielded only a 2% improvement, with the 14600K enhancing by way of a mere 1%.

In phrases of power, the 14600K matched the 7800X3D's general gadget usage, notwithstanding the AMD processor being almost 20% quicker. One considerable issue with the Core i9 series have become glaring: the 14900K expanded overall gadget utilization nearly 30% over the 7800X3D, turning in inferior overall performance.

Performance in The Last of Us Part I displayed a tight competition among the AMD and Intel processors. However, we found no tremendous trade in performance from the 13th gen to 14th gen processors past the mild frequency boom.

The efficiency of AMD's Zen four 3-D V-Cache processors in The Last of Us stands proud. They align with the overall performance of the Core i7 and i9 processors however are a long way extra strength-conservative. For instance, the 14900K accelerated general machine utilization to 657 watts, marking almost a 40% jump in comparison to the in addition acting 7800X3D.

The overall performance of the 3-D V-Cache processors in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor is high-quality. The 7800X3D outperformed the 14900K by using 14%. On the other hand, the 14900K showed handiest a four% velocity benefit over the 13900K. Additionally, the i7 and i5 variants failed to surpass their preceding iterations. In assessment to the non-3-d V-Cache gadgets, the Raptor Lake CPUs showcased good sized prowess, with the 14600K outpacing the 7950X.

Power consumption continues to be Intel's Achilles heel. The 14900K's overall gadget draw was 571 watts, a modest five% extra than the 13900K, but a sizeable 27% hike over the 7800X3D.

ACC, a title acknowledged to optimize 3-d V-Cache processors, did not disappoint on this analysis. The 7800X3D surpassed the 14900K and 14700K with the aid of a good sized 30%. However, the performance bounce from the thirteenth to the 14th gen was negligible. In contrast to traditional Zen 4 CPUs, the Raptor Lake series changed into awesome, with the 14900K being 10% speedier than the 7950X.

Considering the dominating overall performance of the three-D V-Cache CPUs in ACC, it's predicted they'd be more power-green. The 14900K's system usage rose by using handiest thirteen%, in general because ACC would not demand many threads.

In Spider-Man Remastered, with excessive settings and first-class ray tracing, the 14th gen additives slightly edged out their thirteenth gen counterparts. Consequently, the 14900K didn't surpass the 7800X3D and became notably at the back of the 7950X3D.

In this scenario, the 14900K's system electricity consumption surged with the aid of nearly 50% in comparison to the 7800X3D, that is placing. Even in opposition to the advanced 7950X3D, there was a almost 40% uptick in general device electricity requirements, a shocking figure.

For A Plague Tale: Requiem, the brand new 14th gen CPUs did not offer tons over their thirteenth gen siblings. This put the 14900K's overall performance at an average of 150 fps, trailing at the back of the 7700X and 15% in the back of the 7800X3D. The 14900K, 14700K, and 14600K had similar results, a fashion seen within the thirteenth gen models as properly.

Power consumption in A Plague Tale: Requiem wasn't as concerning as in different video games. While the 7800X3D outpaced others, the 14900K's device usage become only 14% more, a highly moderate boom in light of other comparisons.

Assassin's Creed Mirage have to be a playground for the 7950X3D, mirroring the supremacy of the 7800X3D. However, there seems to be a scheduling discrepancy, making it best marginally swifter than the standard 7950X. Nevertheless, the 7950X3D held its ground, equating to the performance of the 14700K and 14900K. Meanwhile, the 7800X3D outperformed Intel's state-of-the-art flagship by 16%.

Yet again, power stays the Achilles heel for the Raptor Lake CPUs. The 14900K raised total machine consumption to 503 watts, a mark 25% loftier than the 7800X3D, even though the Ryzen processor became sixteen% quicker.

Watch Dogs: Legion showcases another putting overall performance from the X3D chips, pushing the RTX 4090 to almost 2 hundred fps at extremely excellent settings. By comparison, the 14900K outstripped the 13900K by means of a trifling three%, rendering the 7800X3D and 7950X3D faster by 17% and 21% respectively. The 14600K lagged at the back of on this name, with the 7600X surpassing it by using thirteen%.

In terms of electricity intake, both the 14600K and 7800X3D exhibited comparable figures. This situates the 14900K as 18% extra stressful in overall device use.

Transitioning to Hitman three, the Intel processors showcase commendable performance. However, the touted "new" 14th gen iterations do not virtually smash new floor. To illustrate, the 14900K surpassed its 13th gen counterpart via handiest 1%, which interprets to an 8% gain over the 7800X3D.

However, the strength narrative stays unchanged. The 14900K's strength consumption escalated, increasing general machine call for with the aid of a massive forty seven% compared to the 7800X3D. This leap in power for a modest eight% performance advantage is indeed underwhelming.

12 Game Average

Here, we gift the common statistics from 12 games, determined using the geomean. In preceding reviews, we located that the 7800X3D outperformed the 13900K through 4% on common. This hole has now increased to ten%. So, what caused this shift? While there were some AGESA code updates contributing minor performance improvements, the number one distinction lies within the games selected.

In our previous set, games like CSGO and The Riftbreaker had been covered, in which the 7800X3D did not exhibit its high-quality performance. However, it is well worth noting that we also excluded Horizon Zero Dawn, which changed into favorable for the X3D chips.

In our current check, maximum of the newly integrated video games displayed stellar overall performance on the X3D chips, specially the 7800X3D. Titles like Assassin's Creed Mirage, Baldur's Gate 3, and Star Wars Jedi Survivor stood out, with Starfield being the simplest underwhelming performance for AMD.

Summarizing the consequences, the 7800X3D turned into 7% faster than the 14900K and 10% quicker than the 14700K. Meanwhile, the 14600K passed the 7700X via four% and the 7600X with the aid of eight%. When as compared with the 13th gen counterparts, each the 14900K and 14700K tested a 3% velocity advantage, even as the 14600K became marginally higher, at just 1% quicker.

Nevertheless, the Core i5 model keeps to provide right cost and keeps a slight stance on strength intake, which we can delve into next.

Power Consumption

This graph highlights Intel's number one mission at present: energy intake. The first-rate-case scenario for Intel throughout a vast choice of games appears to be the 7800X3D and 14900K acting comparably. However, to obtain this parity, the Intel machine consumes round 30% greater electricity.

The Core i7 series has gradually misplaced its appeal, with the 14700K using approximately the identical power because the 13900K at some stage in gaming classes. While the 14600K isn't too annoying, it still parallels the strength intake of the 7950X and 7950X3D.

Operating Temperatures

Given how energy hungry those new 14th gen CPUs are, it's infrequently sudden that the Core i9-14900K reaches its TjMAX of a hundred°C almost without delay beneath an all-middle workload, leading to throttling – inspite of the Arctic Liquid Freezer II 360 cooling it. After jogging for 30 minutes, we referred to a complete device intake of 533 watts, with P-cores running at five.45 GHz and E-cores at four.3 GHz.

The Core i7-14700K followed closely, reaching a CPU package temperature of a hundred°C soon after initiating the Cinebench take a look at. After 1/2 an hour, the common P-core speed was five.35 GHz, and the E-core became 4.25 GHz, main to a device intake of 471 watts. This is 30% extra than the 7950X and a staggering 70% greater than the 7950X3D.

IPC Benchmarks

With the Core i5-14600K, the most bundle temperature discovered turned into 86°C, 14°C shy of TjMAX. Such a result would had been liked in the i9. This allowed the i5 to keep a mean of five.Three GHz at the P-Core and four GHz on the E-Cores, ensuing in a median system usage of 310 watts.

Before concluding our assessments, allow's look at some IPC outcomes. By jogging Baldur's Gate three with all processors at 5GHz (with a 3GHz ring bus and E-cores disabled), we found that the 14900K is roughly 2% swifter than the 13900K, which is three% quicker than the 12900K. From the 12900K to the 14900K, there is a mild 6% growth in IPC.

For the 14700K, we cited a 7% speed increase over the 12700K and just 2% over the 13700K. The 13600K confirmed a four% development over the 12600K, but a mere 1% for the 14600K while compared to the 13600K. These are diffused IPC improvements for this sport.

While electricity intake appears to have advanced since the twelfth gen, our checks did no longer fix the voltage. Instead, the motherboard managed it. There's a danger the 12900K required extra strength. Hence, this information ought to be approached with warning; it is provided broadly speaking for informational functions.

Baldur's Gate 3's enhancements seem surprising whilst juxtaposed with the results from the Cinebench multi-center take a look at. The 14900K was most effective 2% quicker than the 13900K and three% quicker than the 12900K. The 14700K edged out the 13700K by way of 1%, and the distinction among the 14600K and 13600K was an insignificant 1/2-percentage.

In the single-center results, the boom changed into even much less glaring. While it might be tempting to assert this is Intel's typical overall performance trajectory, it has simplest been multiple years, so this kind of declaration would be premature.

What We Learned

The Raptor Lake Refresh is quite an awful lot just that, a refresh, and the newly released chips truely don't should be called a 14th generation. Apart from the 14700K which receives some extra E-cores, this is a simple rebranding with some software optimizations for games.

In brief, this was a large time waster, so thanks for that Intel. But as a minimum we were given to update all of our information and encompass a variety of recent games. Realistically though, we'd as a substitute Intel simply waited till they clearly had a 14th era to launch, rather than rehash what they had been already selling.

Now you might be wondering, what is the point? Why did Intel even hassle? The motive is advertising human beings. For the maximum element, 13th-gen income haven't been extremely good, particularly for the retail marketplace. OEM is probable a different tale as Intel remains the dominant participant, but having said that income have additionally likely bogged down there.

As a show off of the retail marketplace we've the Amazon Best Sellers list for CPUs, which is up to date each hour. You can see the screenshot beneath from this week, but it nearly always looks like this and has for years now. What we are seeing there may be AMD CPUs dominating the pinnacle 10, taking up 7 out of the pinnacle 10 locations.

So rather than heavily discount the thirteenth-gen elements, permitting them to higher compete with the Ryzen 7000 series, Intel has opted to conceal the ones parts as a flashy new 14th era within the wish that this could raise hobby of their computing device processors.

Speaking of pricing, the Core i9-14900K is set to are available round $six hundred, about the equal rate because the 13900K which can be had for $570. That's a difficult fee factor for Intel given the 7950X3D is $650 right now, even as the 7800X3D may be had for just $370, making it by some distance the quality fee option for gamers.

Then if it's productiveness you are interested by, the 7950X is tough to beat at $580 as sixteen huge cores if you may, often become being quicker for complex workloads.

The i7-14700K is a pleasant improve over the 13700K at what need to be the same MSRP, although even as the thirteenth-gen i7 is supposed to value round $420, it is able to be reliably found down around $365 right now. So if the 14700K jumps in at $420 it'll be competing immediately with the 7900X and that is a fit up that suits the Intel processor rather well.

If your priority is productivity then the Core i7 is a higher purchase in our opinion, and the same is also actual for gaming. But in case your focus is solely gaming then the cheaper 7800X3D right away will become the go-to alternative.

Then there may be the Core i5-14600K which is set to price $330, despite the fact that the 13600K is already discounted at round $285, making it the better buy given they're basically the equal CPU. Looking throughout our productivity benchmarks, the 14600K may be visible blending it up with the Ryzen 7 7700X which expenses $three hundred proper now, and both alternative works nicely there. For gaming, the Core i5 became normally quicker, although we are speaking ~4% quicker on average across the 12 games examined, so overall the revel in is going to be a great deal the same.

In a nutshell, the advantage of the Intel CPUs is usually strong performance. We'd say overall performance may be very constant across the huge variety of applications and games tested, so it really is splendid. The key risks when compared to competing AMD parts is the plenty higher energy consumption, and the platform, which as we've got acknowledged for a long term is dead moving ahead. There can be no greater LGA1700 processors and that became genuine after the thirteenth-gen collection became released given 14th-gen is not anything more than a minor rehash.

So if you buy a Core i7-14700K, as an example, you may need a new motherboard if you want to improve past the 14900K in the future. AMD's AM5 platform alternatively will help destiny CPUs. How many generations of CPUs is unclear at this factor, however the ability to fit in what is probably an 8800X3D to your current AM5 board is a nice bonus. Whether or not AM5 could be as a success as AM4 has but to be seen, so we wouldn't weigh your decision in this by myself, however it is a aspect to keep in mind.

Shopping Shortcuts:

• Intel Core i9-14900K on Amazon
• Intel Core i7-14700K on Amazon
• Intel Core i5-14600K on Amazon
• AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D on Amazon
• AMD Ryzen nine 7900X on Amazon
• AMD Ryzen 9 7950X on Amazon
• AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D on Amazon

.SubDriveRevBot margin: 30px 0 0px; border-radius: 3px; line-top: 1.5; font-length: zero.9em; coloration: ssharppfff; heritage-coloration: ssharpp1d4d84; cursor: pointer; heritage-repeat: no-repeat; history-length: comprise; history-function: proper; .SubDriveRevBot:hover history-coloration: ssharpp245996; transition: 0.4s linear; .SubDriveRevBot a coloration: ssharppfff; display: block; width: 100%; top: a hundred%; .SubDriveRevBot a:hover coloration: ssharppfff; .SubDriveRevBot .Titlerr background: rgba(30, 41, fifty one, 0.63); padding: 10px 20px 7px; shade: ssharppfff; letter-spacing: -zero.1px; display: block; border-radius: 3px; font-length: zero.9em; .SubDriveRevBot .Remark font-weight: 500; shade: ssharppf29f26; font-family: Roboto; .SubDriveRevBot .Remarknew font-weight: 500; colour: ssharppfea; font-family: Roboto; .SubDriveRevBot .Bulll margin-backside: 5px !Crucial; padding: 15px 5px If you revel in our content, please keep in mind subscribing.

• Ad-loose TechSpot enjoy whilst helping our paintings
• Our promise: All reader contributions will move closer to funding extra content material
• That way: More tech functions, extra benchmarks and analysis