AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX vs. Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080: The Re-Review



With the discharge of recent drivers and new games, plus the request of many readers, it is time for an up to date study the Radeon RX 7900 XTX vs. GeForce RTX 4080 rivalry with clean benchmarks as you will be planning on shopping for such a GPUs for Christmas, or are hoping to steady a Black Friday deal next month. Whatever the cause, we've got an abundance of new facts for you.

As of writing, you are looking at having to pay as a minimum $910 for a Radeon 7900 XTX, with maximum fashions priced closer to the $1,000 MSRP. For instance, the PowerColor Hellhound is priced at $910, while the Sapphire Pulse is available for $920 at Newegg, with large discounts on these models.

For the GeForce RTX 4080, fees start at approximately $1,100 for the least high priced model. The Gigabyte Eagle, as an instance, is priced at $1,090 and the OC model is $1,100, whilst MSI's Ventus is currently $1,a hundred and eighty. We look at that the huge majority of RTX 4080s are still priced close to the $1,200 MSRP.

This method that the Radeon GPU is commonly ~15% less high priced in the cutting-edge market, aligning with the expected MSRP for every model. The typical value attitude hasn't shifted tons, but with up to date drivers and new games in the mix, it's exciting to peer the overall performance dynamics.

For our assessments, we are the usage of our Ryzen 7 7800X3D check device with 32GB of DDR5-6000 CL30 reminiscence. The display drivers used had been Nvidia's Game Ready 537.Forty two and AMD's Adrenalin Edition 23.9.3. We reckon it's about time we jumped into the information, so let's do it…

Benchmarks

First, we're examining The Last of Us Part I, a recreation that has been substantially updated since its preliminary release. Using the ultra-exceptional preset, the overall performance is stable, with each GPUs acting closely. The RTX 4080 turned into only four% faster at 1080p, at the same time as the 7900 XTX took the lead with a four% advantage at 1440p, growing to 8% at 4K.

Upon permitting upscaling with the excellent DLSS and FSR modes, we observed unusual scaling behavior with the Radeon GPU. After verifying the records multiple instances, we constantly observed that the 7900 XTX showed no additional frames at 1080p with FSR enabled, mirroring the overall performance of the local result. However, the RTX 4080 skilled an 18% increase with DLSS at 1080p.

At 1440p, FSR seemed to paintings as anticipated, improving the 7900 XTX's performance by using 22%. The 4080 noticed a good large increase of 30%. At 4K, each GPUs added similar performance, slightly above ninety fps. There seems to be an problem with FSR in The Last of Us Part I.

For Remnant II and using the ultra preset, the 7900 XTX outperformed, surpassing the RTX 4080 by means of 13% at 1080p, 17% at 1440p, and 22% at 4K. Both GPUs displayed precise performance, mainly remarkable at 4K with the 7900 XTX.

With FSR and DLSS activated, the variations decrease. The 7900 XTX retained its lead, offering a 6% improvement at 1080p, 7% at 1440p, and six% at 4K. Overall, the gaming experience changed into very comparable.

Starfield is up next, and it heavily favors AMD. At 1080p, the effects have been ordinarily constrained through the CPU, however at 1440p, the 7900 XTX became 12% beforehand, and 17% faster at 4K. This performance allowed the Radeon GPU to maintain over 60 fps on average.

Activating FSR and DLSS for the respective GPUs, there has been little distinction at 1080p. However, at 1440p, the RTX 4080 started to close the gap. At 4K, the Radeon GPU accomplished a 21% enhance with FSR, at the same time as the RTX 4080 saw a 25% enhancement with DLSS, resulting within the 7900 XTX maintaining a 14% performance lead.

Turning to Baldur's Gate 3 and utilizing extremely-fine settings, the two GPUs confirmed nearly same overall performance. Results at 1080p and 1440p had been CPU-sure, however even at 4K, the overall performance inside the City of Baldur's Gate become virtually the equal.

When upscaling became grew to become on, performance at 1080p and 1440p remained steady. However, 4K noticed a large improvement, with the Radeon GPU accomplishing a exquisite 60% raise, granting it a 9% lead over the RTX 4080.

For Resident Evil 4, using the prioritize photos preset (which omits ray tracing), the 7900 XTX held a slight part over the 4080 across all examined resolutions. Both GPUs exhibited pinnacle-tier performance.

This recreation only supports FSR. To avoid complications, we activated the most high-quality preset, which incorporates Ray Tracing. The RTX 4080 edged ahead at 1080p and 1440p via a 4% lead, whilst the 7900 XTX became 4% in advance at 4K. The opposition become tight basic.

Finally, with The Callisto Protocol, the RTX 4080 and 7900 XTX were almost indistinguishable, supplying in reality identical outcomes throughout all tested resolutions the use of the ultra-first-class preset.

Interestingly, even with ray tracing activated, the same parity persevered. Typically, one would assume the RTX 4080 to have a mild gain, however each GPUs achieved closely, in spite of a widespread drop in body fees.

Turning to Far Cry 6, this recreation helps most effective FSR. Therefore, we're going to observe the native rasterized overall performance in conjunction with extra ray tracing metrics. Using the ultra preset, the 7900 XTX outpaces the competition by using 8% at 1080p, 14% at 1440p, and a top notch 23% at 4K.

When ray tracing is activated, the overall performance at 1080p and 1440p caps at simply above a hundred and sixty fps because of CPU boundaries. However, at 4K, the Radeon GPU keeps its lead, producing 14% greater frames with a mean of 108 fps.

Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart has been evaluated below numerous configurations. Starting with the very excessive preset, the RTX 4080 surpasses its competitor via 6% at 1080p, 10% at 1440p, and 8% at 4K. Clearly, the GeForce GPU has the upper hand, although the distinction is not substantial.

However, while ray tracing is activated using the great settings, the 7900 XTX lags considerably, producing only seventy six fps at 1080p, which places the 4080 beforehand by means of an dazzling 59%. This fashion continues with the 4080 being sixty one% and 74% faster at 1440p and 4K, respectively.

Introducing upscaling, the RTX 4080 outperforms via delivering 48% extra frames at 1080p, 54% at 1440p, and fifty six% at 4K. Notably, at 4K, the RTX 4080 guarantees an engaging gaming revel in with eighty four fps, leaving the 7900 XTX trailing with a median of fifty four fps.

Next, we delved into Star Wars Jedi: Survivor. Using the Epic preset (ray tracing off), the GeForce GPU led with the aid of 6% at 1080p, 7% at 1440p, and a modest 3% at 4K.

Upon allowing ray tracing, the RTX 4080's benefit become merely three% at 1080p. Although those outcomes are CPU-limited, the GeForce GPU's lead grew to twelve% at 1440p and 13% at 4K. Enabling ray tracing has given a mild part to the GeForce GPU.

However, with upscaling grew to become on, we encountered CPU barriers at 1080p with an average of around 110 fps. Upping the resolution to 1440p eased the CPU bottleneck, awarding the RTX 4080 a 13% lead, which aligns with the previous findings, and then eight% at 4K.

Unfortunately, upscaling seems to malfunction in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor. Despite thorough validation of our consequences, it seems neither FSR nor DLSS gives extensive overall performance enhancements on this sport.

Though Hitman 3 is an older title, it integrates each ray tracing and DLSS/FSR, warranting its inclusion. With the ultra preset, the 7900 XTX and RTX 4080 are neck and neck at 1080p and 1440p. However, at 4K, the Radeon GPU pulls ahead, boasting a 17% performance lead.

Introducing ray tracing modifications the dynamics, setting the 4080 within the lead by 18% at 1080p, 15% at 1440p, and 12% at 4K. Frame prices dipped notably with ray tracing, prompting us to discover upscaling.

Here, both FSR and DLSS appreciably decorate overall performance. The GeForce GPU establishes a dominant lead: 21% at 1080p (though the 7900 XTX achieves a decent one hundred fps), 18% at 1440p, and 14% at 4K.

Shifting to F1 23, we first engaged the remarkable preset, the most setting with out ray tracing. In this scenario, the 7900 XTX considerably outperforms the RTX 4080, with advantages of 26% at 1080p, 24% at 1440p, and 21% at 4K.

However, upon activating the ultra-high preset, the tables flip, permitting the RTX 4080 to aspect beforehand – 3% at 1080p, 4% at 1440p, and eight% at 4K.

With upscaling, we observed a first rate surge in performance. The 7900 XTX and RTX 4080 are intently matched, with a mere five% discrepancy at maximum.

Delving into Forza Horizon 5, RDNA 3 GPUs, inclusive of the 7900 XTX, skilled preliminary overall performance hiccups, but those seem in large part resolved. While the 1% lows failed to fit as much as the 4080's, the general overall performance became commendable with slightly better common frame fees the usage of the ultra high-quality preset.

Upon activating ray tracing with the acute preset, the 7900 XTX generally outperformed its counterpart. However, the 1% lows had been corresponding to the RTX 4080. Specifically, at 1080p, the Radeon GPU averaged 15% quicker, 16% at 1440p, and 20% at 4K.

Introducing upscaling, the 7900 XTX confirmed minimal overall performance advantage, every now and then even dropping some frames. Contrastingly, the 4080 garnered 4% at 1080p with DLSS, 6% at 1440p, and 11% at 4K. In the 4K scenario, the 7900 XTX's lead shrank from 20% to a mere 7% as soon as upscaling was enabled.

We evaluated Cyberpunk 2077's latest model. With the incredible preset, the 7900 XTX and RTX 4080 ran neck and neck. The Radeon GPU had mild leads of 5% at 1440p and 10% at 4K.

Turning on Ray Tracing substantially impacted the 7900 XTX's overall performance. At 1080p, it managed sixty one fps, making the GeForce GPU 46% quicker. This hole continued at 1440p (40% faster) and 4K (42% faster). However, neither GPU produced playable body quotes at those settings.

Fortunately, FSR functioned properly in this name, and so did DLSS. While the 7900 XTX controlled 89 fps at 1080p, the RTX 4080 became still fifty two% faster. Similar patterns have been found at 1440p (forty six% faster) and 4K (29% faster), marking a decisive victory for the GeForce GPU.

We then tested Spider-Man Remastered. With the very high preset, performance was CPU-sure at both 1080p and 1440p using the 7800X3D, capping at a first rate 220 fps. At 4K, each the 7900 XTX and RTX 4080 completed in addition.

Upon allowing ray tracing, performance dipped, however the GPUs remained carefully matched, indicating ray tracing did not abate the Radeon GPU's output.

With upscaling activated, the RTX 4080 became mostly CPU-sure, even at 4K, that's remarkable. At 4K, the 4080 witnessed a 32% overall performance surge with DLSS, even as the 7900 XTX handiest had a 17% improve. Generally, DLSS and FSR scale comparably, but we have noticed times where GeForce GPUs outperform Radeon GPUs with FSR. There's a excessive likelihood the RTX 4080 could have reflected these effects with FSR, even though image excellent may vary, specifically at lower resolutions like 1080p.

Transitioning to Fortnite, we started out with DirectX 11 overall performance under the epic exceptional setting. Generally, competitive game enthusiasts desire DX11 for consistent frame overall performance, meditated in the game's overall performance mode. Here, the GeForce GPU held a good sized side: 20% at 1080p, 14% at 1440p, and a whopping 42% at 4K.

However, Radeon GPUs typically excel with DX12, which we found here. The 7900 XTX and RTX 4080 had been almost identical in performance, regardless of hardware ray tracing enabled, and settings like Lumen and Nanite set to Epic.

When upscaling became enabled, effects have been interesting. The game doesn't aid FSR, so we utilized TSR with the Radeon GPU. At 1440p, the RTX 4080 slightly pulled beforehand, although with minor inconsistencies in 1% lows. At 4K, the 7900 XTX had a forty seven% enhance from TSR, at the same time as the RTX 4080 had handiest a 33% boom. This shift granted the Radeon GPU an eight% lead at this high decision.

In Dying Light 2 Stay Human, with the high preset (which defaults to DX11), the 7900 XTX slightly outperformed the RTX 4080 throughout all examined resolutions, indicating a wonderful final results for AMD. However, ray tracing dramatically altered the landscape. The 4080 became the the front runner: 39% faster at 1080p, 38% at 1440p, and 31% at 4K.

With FSR and DLSS first-class upscaling activated, the RTX 4080 maintained its lead: 36% at 1080p, 33% at 1440p, and 30% at 4K. Upscaling outcomes favored the Radeon GPU as compared to native resolutions, however the variations had been marginal.

Lastly, we explored Hogwarts Legacy. With the ultra preset, the 7900 XTX ruled with 146 fps at 1080p, making it eleven% quicker than the RTX 4080. This lead persevered at 1440p (12% faster) and 4K (14%).

Enabling ray tracing added the 4080 nearer, ensuing in a good opposition among the GPUs.

When upscaling changed into activated with DLSS and FSR, effects at 1080p have been in large part CPU-limited. However, at 1440p, the Radeon GPU gained a 12% lead with ray tracing enabled. At 4K, the RTX 4080 reversed this trend, outperforming the Radeon GPU by using 12%.

Performance Summary

Across the 17 games tested, for rasterization-only overall performance the Radeon 7900 XTX was on average just 3% quicker. The most effective actual outliers were F1 23 where the Radeon GPU was 26% faster and Fortnite using DX11 wherein it turned into 17% slower.

Earlier inside the year we put together a 50 recreation benchmark between those GPUs and discovered that on common at 1440p they introduced the equal performance. This time with some distance fewer games, but with a number of newer titles and of direction the ultra-modern drivers, the Radeon 7900 XTX ended up popping out on pinnacle by means of a four% margin, even though some thing inside five% we deem a tie.

At 4K the Radeon GPU was 7% quicker on common. At this point the distinction is beginning to end up noteworthy, and if it wasn't for the massive loss in Fortnite it'd have almost were given to double digits.

Performance Summary: Ray-Tracing

Now searching at simply the ray tracing consequences where we've got 13 video games examined, the Radeon 7900 XTX was on average 8% slower, so the results had been flipped after which some. There are too many titles where the Radeon GPU receives destroyed with the aid of the GeForce RTX together with Ratchet & Clank, Cyberpunk and Dying Light 2 because the worst examples.

Things do not enhance at 1440p and now the 7900 XTX changed into on average nine% slower, though an awesome bring about Forza helped and close calls in The Callisto Protocol, Fortnite, Far Cry 6, Spider-Man, F1 23, Resident Evil four and Hogwarts Legacy all stopped the Radeon GPU from getting completely ran over.

We find greater of the same at 4K, right here the 7900 XTX turned into 7% slower on common and even as there is a few shuffling of the margins, standard the outcomes are a lot the identical. The largest alternate is visible while searching on the Far Cry 6 records, the 7900 XTX goes from 1% slower at 1440p to 14% faster at 4K, so this could be all the way down to reminiscence bandwidth.

Performance Summary: Ray Tracing Upscaling

Now if we consist of the upscaled ray tracing facts at 1080p, which cuts us down to just 10 titles as now not all games assist DLSS which include The Callisto Protocol, we discover that the 7900 XTX is now nine% slower on common. That's no longer to say this is a scaling issue with FSR although as the games listing has modified, although we did see some examples in which FSR didn't behave as expected.

At 1440p the Radeon GPU slips to are available eleven% slower and once more it is Ratchet and Clank, Cyberpunk and Dying Light 2 wherein the 7900 XTX truely gets rolled by the GeForce.

Finally at 4K, the Radeon 7900 XTX is again eleven% slower on average, and this end result is helped by means of strong overall performance by using the Nvidia camp in Fortnite and Forza Horizon 5.

And the Winner Is...

As we mentioned on the outset of this evaluate, considering the high-quality pricing for each GPU, the Radeon 7900 XTX is 15% greater less costly than the GeForce RTX 4080. In terms of rasterization performance, the Radeon GPU often outperforms the RTX, particularly at 4K wherein it changed into 7% quicker on average. In some video games, this margin passed 20%. However, the distinction at 1080p and 1440p had been negligible, despite the fact that the Radeon had a mild side.

This makes the Radeon GPU a stable value proposition. But in case you're inquisitive about ray tracing overall performance, then the landscape becomes murkier. With upscaling became on, the 7900 XTX lagged with the aid of a mean of eleven% in ray tracing, and in positive games, it changed into greater than 20% slower. Ratchet & Clank stood out because the most mentioned disparity, even as Dying Light 2 and Cyberpunk also supplied challenges for the Radeon GPU.

Taking that under consideration, we agree with the Radeon 7900 XTX need to be as a minimum 15% cheaper to absolutely rival the RTX 4080 and compete on your money against the RTX 4080.

One gain of the Radeon 7900 XTX is the more VRAM, leaping from 16GB to 24GB – a giant 50% increase. While impressive on paper for the Radeon GPU, it remains to be visible if this could be a determining aspect in the realistic lifespan of those products.

On the drawback, the 7900 XTX every now and then pushes up general system energy usage by way of around 15%, or about 60 watts. However, in our preliminary evaluation we recognized times wherein strength consumption was similar, so this shouldn't be a identifying component for these fashions.

The GeForce RTX 4080 boasts advanced upscaling generation. While DLSS would not continually vastly outshine competition, it continually gives the best picture best, specially at lower resolutions like 1440p and probably 1080p, , although we don't necessarily endorse it there.

The RTX 4080 also excels in ray tracing overall performance. With the latest creation of ray reconstruction, there's capacity for even higher exceptional ray tracing, even though this stays to be fully found out. Given that ray reconstruction continues to be in its infancy, we expect broader support in the upcoming months.

Another function is DLSS Frame Generation, which can be regarded as a body-smoothing era. It elevates visuals via simulating the effects of higher frame rates. Frame Gen proves useful for unique single-player games whilst base body quotes hover around 60 fps. While now not a really perfect replacement for true high-refresh-price gameplay, it does enhance the enjoy in certain contexts.

However, this technology is satisfactory proper for unmarried-participant games. For those primarily invested in competitive shooters, contemporary body generation technologies might not offer tangible advantages. On a associated notice, AMD lately launched FSR 3, to be had in unexciting video games, and we are currently properly into checking out it out, so we are not going to say some thing greater approximately it right here.

Bottom line, with a 15% discount, the Radeon 7900 XTX stands as a tremendous alternative to the RTX 4080, but it is now not an automatic preference. With the maximum less costly 4080s priced round $1,090, we trust the 7900 XTX should be round $900 to be the desired preference, and the PowerColor Hellhound is sort of there. We desire that is beneficial in the course of the vacation season, so that you know how these GPUs want to be priced to get the satisfactory bang in your buck.

Shopping Shortcuts:

• Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 on Amazon
• AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX on Amazon
• Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 on Amazon
• AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT on Amazon
• Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 Ti on Amazon
• Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti on Amazon
• AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT on Amazon
• AMD Radeon RX 7600 on Amazon
• Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 on Amazon

.SubDriveRevBot margin: 30px zero 0px; border-radius: 3px; line-height: 1.Five; font-length: 0.9em; color: ssharppfff; history-colour: ssharpp1d4d84; cursor: pointer; background-repeat: no-repeat; historical past-length: include; historical past-position: right; .SubDriveRevBot:hover heritage-colour: ssharpp245996; transition: zero.4s linear; .SubDriveRevBot a coloration: ssharppfff; show: block; width: 100%; height: one hundred%; .SubDriveRevBot a:hover coloration: ssharppfff; .SubDriveRevBot .Titlerr history: rgba(30, forty one, 51, zero.Sixty three); padding: 10px 20px 7px; colour: ssharppfff; letter-spacing: -0.1px; show: block; border-radius: 3px; font-size: 0.9em; .SubDriveRevBot .Observation font-weight: 500; shade: ssharppf29f26; font-own family: Roboto; .SubDriveRevBot .Remarknew font-weight: 500; coloration: ssharppfea; font-own family: Roboto; .SubDriveRevBot .Bulll margin-bottom: 5px !Essential; padding: 15px 5px If you enjoy our content material, please bear in mind subscribing.

• Ad-free TechSpot revel in even as assisting our work
• Our promise: All reader contributions will pass closer to funding more content material
• That manner: More tech features, more benchmarks and analysis