Cyberpunk 2.Zero: Phantom Liberty Optimization Guide: Boost FPS with the aid of forty%



With the brand new Cyberpunk 2077 2.Zero replace and Phantom Liberty growth, we are bringing you a clean optimization manual that goes via every setting in the sport to inform you which settings are worth turning to Ultra, and which might be worth turning down to improve performance.

Cyberpunk 2.Zero is similar to the authentic release in terms of the first-class settings it offers, although CD Projekt Red have delivered extra features over time, such as XeSS and FSR upscaling, in addition to a route tracing technology preview.

The new Dogtown region this is added with Phantom Liberty is pretty annoying – while additionally being visually stunning – so it is this vicinity of the game that we are focusing on for both the visible comparisons and overall performance facts. But, it can additionally be similar to different components of the game, so this manual will be beneficial in case you're starting a Cyberpunk playthrough from scratch as properly.

We'll awareness on GPU optimization that is generally the largest bottleneck for the sport, even though we will talk a touch about CPU settings as we pass. We're benchmarking with a GeForce RTX 4070 as performance with ray tracing on is proper on the brink with an 8GB GPU, so we have bumped it up to 12GB at the same time as trying to maintain to the (now pretty expensive) mid-variety of photographs playing cards. The CPU used for checking out is the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D with 32GB of DDR5-6000 CL30 memory, on MSI's MPG X670E Carbon WiFi motherboard.

All recreation visual captures that you will see below have been taken on a GeForce RTX 4090, so we are able to provide excessive body rate 4K high-quality comparisons. We propose looking the YouTube embeds at 4K satisfactory if possible. And before we get into matters, every pleasant setting is break up into a visual and performance phase.

The performance records is captured in a benchmark bypass at 1440p this is designed to present you a take a look at the effect of a setting on normal sport performance, instead of spot checking FPS numbers which is not as accurate or consultant of standard gaming. The location we have used for benchmarking is in Dogtown on foot among an in depth indoor and out of doors section that you may fast find out at the start of the expansion. We did not use the integrated benchmark.

We'll undergo every individual putting and study presets on the give up of this manual. There are lots of settings which have very little effect, so count on us to breeze through the ones. We're additionally not going to assess upscaling nice in this name, we've already included these substantially before and most humans are familiar with what they bring about. You need to tune those options to your liking and resolution, although for maximum gamers we would recommend using as a minimum some shape of upscaling for an smooth overall performance improvement (DLSS Quality or FSR Quality modes, for instance).

Texture Quality

For a higher illustration of photo first-class comparisons, check out the HUB video below:

The texture pleasant placing influences the sharpness and readability of a few in game textures, with lower settings making textures more blurry. Even on the medium setting you may note quite a massive reduction in texture clarity relative to the excessive setting, and on low the game may be very blurry.

Not all textures are impacted, there are some floor level information and dynamic presentations that do not seem to be affected, however everything else will become a great deal worse on decrease first-rate textures. We additionally don't suppose the texture best in Cyberpunk is particularly great given the high-quality of effects in different areas, draw distance for textures is quite weak so ideally the sport would include an ultra setting that surely pumps up the ones textures for people with high end GPUs, but for now the High placing will have to do.

When we observe overall performance it is no wonder to see that the feel putting has little effect when you have enough VRAM, as we do on the RTX 4070 we used for testing. I'd strongly propose retaining this placing on High for most photographs playing cards, and most effective flip down the placing in case you run out of VRAM, along with when gambling on a 6GB GPU.

8GB GPUs will largely be exceptional playing Cyberpunk with High textures, even though with ray tracing enabled at high resolutions like 4K, overall performance can lessen incredibly so the sport is very plenty on the edge with 8GB GPUs – 10 or 12GB appears quite snug.

Motion Blur

For a higher representation of photograph first-rate comparisons, take a look at out the HUB video underneath:

Motion Blur is a single toggle that impacts each digicam and according to object motion blur, so sadly the ones settings aren't uncoupled and you can't disable digital camera blur at the same time as keeping object blur. The high and low settings here surely regulate the power of the blur effect, high being more blurry. Off disables movement blur as anticipated.

The implementation of motion blur in Cyberpunk is super in that permitting the function has little to no effect on performance. So whether it's really worth the usage of will more often than not come right down to personal preference. We constantly prefer disabling movement blur whilst playing at a high frame charge, despite the fact that in case you are concentrated on 30 FPS then movement blur will conceal the truth the game is running as a slideshow.

Contact Shadows

Contact Shadows is a trustworthy setting. With it enabled, some objects are capable of cast shadows onto itself or other close by objects. In the video example, the sandbags are casting sun shadows onto itself which will increase the realism and intensity to the presentation. Not all gadgets are impacted but a surprising range are.

Even even though disabling touch shadows can provide a three to four percentage performance development, I think for most people you will want to play the game with this putting enabled. However if you are interested in a huge overall performance development, then turning touch shadows off is a feasible preference as it would not disable all shadows.

Improved Facial Lighting Geometry

Improved Facial Lighting Geometry is a placing that I couldn't without a doubt inform if it became grew to become on or off, both from a visuals and performance angle. I assessed a number of faces in distinct lighting situations and it didn't appear to make a great deal distinction. I'd leave this putting on.

Anisotropy

Anisotropy influences the clarity of textures when regarded at off angles. I failed to spot a massive difference among the setting on 16 or eight, however dropping down to four does reduce the crispness of textures in some circumstances – it's minor but honestly great. Using the putting on 1 makes the sport look lousy, so sincerely this isn't always the best way to play the game and shouldn't be used unless you also are turning down texture exceptional as why hassle going for walks excessive textures if you're no longer going to filter them properly.

Luckily like in maximum video games anisotropy has little to no performance effect except you turn it to one, which offers as much as a 3% performance improvement. Unless you have low give up hardware I would endorse keeping this placing at the maximum to be had stage.

Local Shadow Mesh Quality

Local Shadow Mesh Quality impacts the satisfactory of geometric detail used to cast shadows from artificial mild resources, that is pretty the area of interest feature. I determined it pretty tough to tell the distinction among the three nice options, even though in this scene I did note that switching from excessive/medium to low did reduce the shadow accuracy for this barrier, evidently indeed the low placing reduces the geometry high-quality used for the shadow. Most of the time you will see no distinction and also you probably wouldn't have noticed this both except I pointed it out.

Given that there is a small performance development transferring from High to Medium with little to no perceptible nice trade, I could endorse the medium putting. Low does produce a high-quality difference but failed to seem to include lots of a overall performance benefit so I would not use that mode.

Local Shadow Quality

Local Shadow Quality does precisely what it says: for shadows casted by using artificial mild sources (such as indoors), reducing this setting reduces the nice and resolution of those shadows. The High setting preserves the sharpest nearby shadows, medium is a clear discount in comparison to high with a blurrier shadow presentation, low is basically same to medium, then off absolutely turns off local shadows which hurts the photo nice.

The best most important overall performance difference I spotted from this setting changed into turning it down from High to Medium. As there has been now not a good deal of a difference between medium and off outdoor of a small improvement to at least one% lows in our take a look at area, I would strongly advocate now not turning off nearby shadows.

For those after the quality visual quality I sense that the High setting is a clear enough improve to justify a 2% hit to performance. For the ones after greater performance, medium is a superb preference as it nonetheless preserves nearby shadows, simply at decreased high-quality.

Cascaded Shadows Range

For a higher representation of picture exceptional comparisons, take a look at out the HUB video below:

Cascaded Shadows Range affects how a long way into the gap you'll see dynamic shadows casted from the solar. In this scene for instance you may note that with the setting on excessive, quite much all of the NPCs and grass even a ways into the gap have sun shadows.

Turning this right down to medium gets rid of sun shadows for remote NPCs, however preserves it for closer NPCs. Turning it to off eliminates shadows for remote and close to NPCs, even affecting some of the nearer grass elements so the sport does look flatter with this setting on low.

Not a big overall performance advantage available here despite the fact that components of our benchmark run are outside in which this putting would make a difference. At nice turning the placing to low might see a 1 to 2 percentage advantage, which simply is not really worth it. I would recommend maintaining this on excessive.

Cascaded Shadows Resolution

Cascaded Shadows Resolution influences the sharpness and clarity of sun shadows. The excessive and medium settings are pretty similar, however High does produce much less shadow aliasing in some scenes so is the least artifact manner to play. The low placing though has absolutely reduced shadow resolution with lots of shimmering and aliasing throughout the presentation so I'd keep away from that mode if possible.

For performance you'll simplest see a 1-2 percentage gain moving from excessive to medium so for the pleasant visual first-class I'd stick with high shadow resolution, best using medium in case you want greater overall performance. Low plays pretty further to medium for a far large reduction to photograph fine, so I would not advocate it.

Distant Shadows Resolution

Distant shadows resolution is similar to cascaded shadows decision however most effective influences shadows in addition from the camera. The impact of this putting may be tough to spot however we did discover one place where the difference is visible. Considering it has little to no overall performance impact in in depth regions of the sport I might use the High setting.

Volumetric Fog Resolution

For a better representation of picture fine comparisons, take a look at out the HUB video below:

Volumetric Fog Resolution is just like this putting on different video games in that it has a big effect on performance. Visually even though, the variations may be pretty subtle. When desk bound, there is now not a large distinction among Ultra, High and Medium, with higher settings being barely extra correct. However whilst losing to Low you may notice a reduction to fog great even if standing nevertheless, with artifacts I assume are considerable.

In movement the differences are a little more suggested, with Ultra providing the ultimate smooth experience, High looking very barely worse than Ultra, Medium being a step down, and Low producing many artifacts. Given these are pretty general temporal artifacts from the usage of lower volumetric fog excellent, it is possible you may not even observe this throughout ordinary gameplay as the quantity of fog and its density is pretty a good deal the identical even on lower fine settings.

When we observe the performance effect, losing volumetric fog from Ultra to High provides only a 1% overall performance improvement, but Ultra to Medium is a extensive 7% impact to common body costs. Low is slightly greater performant than Medium. The degree of artifacting from medium fog is surely greater major than the use of Ultra, but I feel it would not destroy the experience to that tremendous of a diploma and I might take the 7% performance advantage it provides. Ultra is clearly the exceptional way to play for game enthusiasts with excessive stop GPUs, however for absolutely everyone else I would optimize this all the way down to medium; and I'd avoid low even on lower give up images cards.

Volumetric Cloud Quality

Volumetric Cloud Quality affects the resolution of clouds. It's quite difficult to inform the difference between Ultra, High and Medium, despite the fact that I wouldn't propose Off as it simply turns off clouds completely. Medium produces slightly lower resolution clouds than Ultra.

What's exciting about the overall performance of this placing is that in extensive areas of the sport you simply may not note a lot of a performance impact. That's due to the fact clouds are high up within the sky where you aren't frequently looking, and the heaviest regions of the sport additionally generally tend to have massive tall skyscrapers that difficult to understand the visibility of clouds. Yes you'll be aware a performance distinction if you tilt up and have a look at the sky, or exit to the greater sparse areas of the sport, but those areas also carry out lots higher than the metropolis regions of Cyberpunk in wellknown.

Given all of this, I might suggest the use of the medium excellent setting. It does not look that exclusive from Ultra and does deliver a performance increase in less in depth areas where clouds are extra visible, I saw up to an 8% development. Just don't assume this putting to relieve overall performance problems in Cyberpunk's greater intensive regions because it's not likely clouds excessive up inside the sky which you are not searching at are the purpose for lower overall performance.

Max Dynamic Decals

I did not see tons impact to overall performance from the max dynamic decals placing even if unloading tons of bullets into various areas. I'd leave this on extremely.

Screen Space Reflections

Screen space reflections high-quality is with the aid of a ways the most in depth non ray traced setting in the game. Simply positioned it affects the resolution and consequently readability of reflections, the higher you go, the clearer the reflections. Moving from Ultra to High isn't always a large difference even though it's far noticeable in a few areas. Medium is a step down with blurrier and less defined reflections, while Low without a doubt cuts down on the decision to basically simply provide the essence of a reflection.

Off disables the function absolutely, which given the quantity of reflective surfaces in the game provides a big blow to photo first-class. There's additionally the psycho putting, one step above Ultra, which affords a good higher mirrored image resolution however the hole between these modes is similar to the difference between excessive and extremely, so it is no longer a large development.

For game enthusiasts that need to experience optimized however nonetheless high great visuals, we assume the medium placing here is the way to head as it gives a 20 percent performance development for most effective a small hit to visuals, that's truly extensive. I can also justify excessive because it appears near ultra but with an 11% gain, however I sense that maximum game enthusiasts will decide on the extra overall performance on offer from medium.

Low is a remarkable choice in case you want even more overall performance, as the 26% performance advantage over extremely is large given reflections are nonetheless enabled, even though at a lower high-quality than medium. Turning off SSR offers a 10% benefit over medium however notably transforms the sport's visuals. The psycho setting is completely needless as it destroys overall performance for simplest a minor nice advantage, certainly would not endorse the usage of it.

Subsurface Scattering Quality

Subsurface scattering high-quality is meant to have an effect on skin exceptional however in reality I couldn't discover any visual distinction. It can be there, it is simply not very great. And performance is basically unchanged whether or not you operate high or low so may as well maintain this placing on excessive.

Ambient Occlusion Quality

Ambient occlusion works within the equal way as different games, supplying self shadowing for close together gadgets. The distinction among high, medium and coffee is the electricity of ambient occlusion, with higher settings imparting extra shadowing and more depth.

The impact to this varies relying at the place, but I do experience that low makes the game world look flatter than using excessive. Off disables the effect completely, which makes the sport look very flat and underwhelming, genuinely might now not recommend that putting.

As for performance, ambient occlusion doesn't have a massive impact. Switching from high to low progressed my frame price inside the most intensive vicinity of Dogtown by way of just 2 percent, it is handiest disabling the impact entirely that gives a huge overall performance raise. Given that I feel the sport looks highly flatter the usage of low AO, I'd hold this placing on excessive, only decreasing to low if you need greater overall performance.

Color Precision

Color precision is meant to reduce banding whilst set to high but I failed to certainly spot any significant difference to medium. Given that medium is 1% faster on average you could as properly use the medium putting.

Mirror Quality

Mirror great is not an critical placing in Cyberpunk because the maximum in depth areas will normally run worse than areas that have mirrors enabled. For that purpose you may as properly just leave this on high as it has no impact in the course of ordinary gameplay. However if mirrors sincerely break performance to your machine, every setting produces a step down in reflect decision. I noticed as much as an 21% overall performance advantage in mirrors switching from High to Medium, and 31% from extremely to low. Medium is a great midpoint here.

Level of Detail

Level of Detail is supposed to affect geometry element and draw distances but in Cyberpunk I observed the setting has no impact to visuals or performance. Bit weird but I am quite assured that even in areas with good sized view distances, this setting does not alternate some thing, so keep it on excessive.

Crowd Density

Crowd density affects the wide variety of NPCs in busy regions and normally while GPU confined this placing has little to no impact on overall performance. Therefore when you have a excessive quit CPU and are not finding your self CPU constrained, the exceptional direction of movement is putting this to excessive so you experience a extra densely packed sport international.

However crowd density continues to be reasonable on low, so when you have a slower CPU and are suffering in those difficult to run regions of Dogtown, turning the putting down to low is certainly feasible and will improve performance somewhat.

Ray Traced Reflections

For a better illustration of photo nice comparisons, take a look at out the HUB video below:

Next up we get to the ray traced results. Ray traced reflections in our opinion has the largest effect on visual nice. These reflections replace screen area reflections and paintings in lots of greater circumstances, like when the item in the reflection isn't on screen, or whilst the reflective surface is glass and needs to reflect what is behind you.

This considerably transforms the visuals of the game to make it look higher and more correct. On pinnacle of this, different reflections where SSR might normally be carried out are now stronger with accelerated decision and better accuracy. In many regions reflections cross from blurry to a whole lot clearer whilst RT reflections are enabled.

The performance hit is quite big from the use of this setting, so the optimized preference would be to now not use ray tracing. RT reflections, relative to extremely display screen area reflections, prompted a 24% performance hit on the RTX 4070, a gap it truly is even larger on AMD GPUs.

Relative to medium SSR that we propose for optimized gaming, ray traced reflections runs 37 percent slower, so that is very an awful lot a top class visual feature. However it runs a whole lot higher than psycho screen area reflections, once more making that psycho setting needless.

Ray Traced Sun Shadows

Ray traced solar shadows are meant to enhance the accuracy of shadows in the sport, but it ends up just making the presentation look extraordinary to extremely rasterized shadows, it does not always make the game appearance particularly higher for my part. Often rasterized shadows are sharper if that is what you are after, and in lots of areas ray traced shadows look pretty close to rasterized shadows.

Given that permitting this placing reduced performance by 14 percent, we would not recommend the usage of it.

Ray Traced Local Shadows

Ray traced neighborhood shadows is an exciting one. In a few areas I located that RT shadows for synthetic lighting fixtures could make the sport look worse. In different areas it can substantially improve accuracy and even offer shadows wherein previously there weren't any.

On average in our benchmark pass we determined a comparable effect from RT local shadows as RT solar shadows, but the visual effect is usually better from nearby shadows. Running nearby and solar shadows collectively isn't always that much more in depth than simply running one of the settings, however our choice is neighborhood shadows.

Ray Traced Lighting

For a better representation of photograph first-rate comparisons, take a look at out the HUB video beneath:

Ray traced lights affects worldwide illumination and ambient occlusion, with each of the 3 modes adding additional accuracy. This is a problematic placing to assess as a variety of the time, ray traced lighting fixtures makes the game appearance distinctive, however doesn't always make it appearance better – specially after you understand it is no longer mainly accurate in comparison to the path traced mode.

In many scenes the effect of RT lighting fixtures became apparent, but definitely affected what gadgets received shadowing and illumination. In some scenes I located RT lights to be actually superior and greater accurate, in others it just looked like an artist had long gone thru and modified the way the sport seemed, as artists will do for all lighting styles including rasterization.

The differences among RT lighting fixtures on medium, Ultra and Psycho have been also fairly subtle and once more by and large just changed the manner the sport seemed without making it genuinely appearance higher. Personally this is a placing I might experiment with and best enable if you substantially select the manner the ray traced lighting fixtures looks as compared to extremely-stage rasterization. I discover RT lighting fixtures looks barely higher in my view, though I could not justify using a placing better than medium.

As for overall performance effect, RT lights has the most important impact of the RT settings outside of route tracing. A 36% impact the usage of medium, forty one% the use of Ultra and 48% the use of Psycho is quite difficult to justify in my view. If you only have so much performance to spare, I could tons choose getting the visual impact of RT reflections with a 37% hit relative to medium display screen space reflections, as compared to a 36% impact for RT lighting fixtures versus extremely rasterization.

Path Tracing

There's also the path traced mode, which we are now not going to cover in-depth right here as obviously if you're trying to optimize performance you might not be the usage of course tracing.

The recreation does look drastically better than with both rasterized or normal ray traced visuals, but it will drop performance by 75% versus ultra settings – as in, you will get one sector of the performance you had formerly – which makes it genuinely unplayable on most mid-variety hardware.

This setting is for those who have excessive stop GPUs that do not care about optimized performance and simply need the quality visible experience, and honest sufficient, if you've offered an RTX 4090, go beforehand and experience that path tracing, don't worry approximately this manual.

Presets

For a better representation of image nice comparisons, check out the HUB video under:

The presets integrate all of the special settings we saw before in my opinion. Relative to extremely rasterization, excessive barely reduces mirrored image and fog nice, and cuts crowd density, at the same time as retaining all other outcomes.

Medium drops texture high-quality to medium which fairly hurts the readability of these textures, at the same time as additionally lowering shadow quality really, it drops mirrored image satisfactory down to medium for a great effect, and further reduces crowd density. Ambient occlusion satisfactory is identical to ultra, as is the usage of contact shadows, so not each region gets reduce down using this preset and ultimately I think it still seems correct on medium settings.

Low doesn't honestly flip everything to the lowest setting, however it does tremendously cut texture pleasant, anisotropy is impacted, shadows are decrease exceptional, fog is dropped to the lowest placing that does growth artifacting, ambient occlusion is decreased which makes the sport global look flatter, and most different settings are became down. But given the low setting does no longer disable shadows, reflections, clouds or ambient occlusion it nevertheless looks respectable as compared to minimal settings.

The Steam Deck preset is one of the quality in the game even in case you aren't absolutely playing it on a Steam Deck. It makes use of a mixture of high and medium settings at the same time as placing FSR to Balanced, however of route you could tweak upscaling in your liking. The key advantages to this preset is that it cranks texture excellent as much as excessive, continues first rate excellent reflections and fog, and can provide medium pleasant shadows. In many respects the Steam Deck preset visually is a better choice than the medium preset.

As for the ray traced presets, those use ultra settings however begin to introduce ray tracing. RT Low simplest permits local shadows for a minimal visual impact handiest in some eventualities. Medium activates nearby shadows, solar shadows and lighting fixtures on medium but leaves reflections off, now not a large fan of the optimization there for the medium RT preset. Then RT extremely turns every RT characteristic on and units lights to Ultra. RT Overdrive enables direction tracing.

Preset performance suggests good scaling even without the use of upscaling technology. High offers a 14% performance development over Ultra, and medium is sort of 40% quicker even as nonetheless looking amazing. The Steam Deck preset is a bit extra intensive than medium but nevertheless offers a 34% gain over Ultra.

Personally, gaming on the Ultra preset is a little needless when High is so close visually but can provide 14% more overall performance, while the Steam Deck preset is likewise a exquisite choice in case you need a decent FPS benefit with out messing around similarly, simply be sure to alter those upscaling settings.

Meanwhile, the low preset is seventy seven% quicker than extremely and really, for lots of game enthusiasts with mid-range and lower tier hardware, low is still a notable manner to play the game as a number of features stay enabled and the sport nevertheless looks quite desirable.

As for the RT presets those are all pretty taxing, even though RT low simplest sees a 16% performance impact as it simplest allows local shadows. Once you get to medium you may see a 40% cut to overall performance, Ultra will halve overall performance as a minimum, and the overdrive putting will cripple something however high-give up Nvidia pics playing cards.

We've examined on an RTX 4070, so note that those presets will scale even worse on AMD GPUs, where ray tracing could be very tough to justify outside of flagship RDNA3 GPUs. For optimized performance we would not use any of these presets, even though ray tracing is probably going to be viable on higher end GPUs in which there is loads greater overall performance headroom.

Recommended and Optimized Settings

Finally, right here are our TechSpot Optimized Settings. The TechSpot Quality mode is aimed to be a model of Ultra settings, sacrificing display space reflection first-class and a bit bit to volumetric fog to hit a whole lot higher body quotes. Relative to ultra pretty tons everything else is maintained on the best placing, such as shadow high-quality, ambient occlusion, textures, and degree of element.

Setting TechSpot Quality Texture Quality High Upscaling Tune to Liking Motion Blur Off Contact Shadows Off Improved Facial Lighting Geometry On Anisotropy sixteen Local Shadow Mesh Quality Medium Local Shadow Quality Medium Cascaded Shadows Range High Cascaded Shadows Resolution Medium Distant Shadows Resolution High Volumetric Fog Resolution Low Volumetric Cloud Quality Medium Max Dynamic Details Ultra Screen Space Reflections Quality Low Subsurface Scattering Quality High Ambient Occlusion Low Color Precision Medium Mirror Quality Medium Level of Detail High Crowd Density High

The TechSpot Performance mode is for those that want greater performance and would commonly pick out the medium preset. This mode slightly cuts lower back on shadows and ambient occlusion and similarly reduces display screen space reflections, however keeps high textures and crowd density which can be reduce while using the constructed in medium and coffee presets.

Setting TechSpot Performance Texture Quality High Upscaling Tune to Liking Motion Blur Off Contact Shadows On Improved Facial Lighting Geometry On Anisotropy 16 Local Shadow Mesh Quality Medium Local Shadow Quality High Cascaded Shadows Range High Cascaded Shadows Resolution High Distant Shadows Resolution High Volumetric Fog Resolution Medium Volumetric Cloud Quality Medium Max Dynamic Details Ultra Screen Space Reflections Quality Medium Subsurface Scattering Quality High Ambient Occlusion High Color Precision Medium Mirror Quality Medium Level of Detail High Crowd Density High

Lastly, we have the ray tracing hierarchy of importance... In Cyberpunk, ray tracing commonly offers a bigger performance effect than you may get hold of in visual advantage, meaning that for most game enthusiasts after the satisfactory optimization, you would disable ray tracing absolutely. However, those with higher cease GPUs may additionally want to dabble in ray tracing anyway, in which case I would permit it with the subsequent order of importance.

In my opinion, reflections is the putting you'll need to apply in case you use ray tracing at all, observed through local shadows. RT lighting set to medium is of lesser significance but can be well worth the use of in case you decide on the manner it adjustments lighting fixtures in the sport. I wouldn't hassle with RT lighting fixtures higher than medium, or RT sun shadows.

Path tracing promises a large visual improvement at a big price to overall performance, so while the mode is incredible, the significant hardware necessities clearly limit this to the highest quit GPUs, subsequently why it's labelled a technology preview.

For a higher illustration of photograph first-class comparisons, take a look at out the HUB video below:

In the video above you could see some examples of our optimized settings in movement. The TechSpot Quality mode for the most element seems very just like extremely, mainly when you are not preventing to investigate reflections. Cyberpunk scales thoroughly and at the same time as the medium preset nevertheless seems high-quality in our opinion, using TechSpot Quality as a substitute is even better and really preserves the overall high great enjoy you must anticipate from this identify.

TechSpot Performance is simplest downgraded barely from TechSpot Quality and finally ends up turning in better photograph quality than the medium preset in my view, because of its higher level of texture best and elevated crowd density. With that said, game enthusiasts with weaker CPUs will probably should lessen crowd density to enhance CPU overall performance. With these kinds of optimizations Cyberpunk is nowhere close to as disturbing as it first appears whilst looking at ultra preset benchmarks.

In our check vicinity, we discovered a 42% performance development the use of TechSpot Quality over the Ultra preset, which ended up turning in similar overall performance to the medium preset – a amazing result.

The TechSpot Performance preset introduced sixty three% greater overall performance than Ultra, and a fifteen% benefit on TechSpot Quality, so it ended up sitting among medium and low with superior photo great.

This should take any GPU that typically runs Cyberpunk at round 60 FPS the usage of Ultra settings, and rework it into an 85 FPS experience. Those only getting round forty FPS have to now be hitting an awful lot closer to 60 FPS, mainly the usage of TechSpot Performance.

So there you've got it... Cyberpunk 2077 Phantom Liberty optimized settings with a focus on the brand new location of the sport – which itself is stunning from a visual, design and artwork direction perspective.

Having now been labored on for numerous years after its release, Cyberpunk is in a higher state than ever on PC and remains one of the fine searching games you may play right now. It's also usually properly optimized, the two.0 replace is surely a ways higher than Star Wars Jedi Survivor or Starfield, for example.

The high-quality component to Cyberpunk on PC is there is a wealth of best settings that range anywhere from magnificent path tracing to excessive great rasterization. Some human beings might also feel they are missing out at the ray traced revel in in Cyberpunk if their hardware can't deal with it however virtually we don't sense it truly is the case, even on medium and coffee settings this sport holds up nicely, it appears brilliant all whilst delivering a solid level of overall performance. Just from preset scaling alone there may be a 70% performance advantage on the table and that is without disabling key capabilities like reflections.

The most effective criticism of the game's visuals that we've is that texture great and draw distance can be progressed, particularly as high quit GPUs in recent times feature 16GB or greater of VRAM and Cyberpunk does little to fill that form of VRAM buffer. An extremely texture nice setting would be a great deal liked for those with RTX 4090s on the way to be enjoying the course tracing mode the transforms the game's lighting without remodeling its level of detail.

Shopping Shortcuts:

• Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 on Amazon
• Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 Ti on Amazon
• Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti on Amazon
• Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 on Amazon
• Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 on Amazon
• AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D on Amazon
• AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT on Amazon
• AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX on Amazon

.SubDriveRevBot margin: 30px 0 0px; border-radius: 3px; line-peak: 1.Five; font-length: zero.9em; colour: ssharppfff; history-colour: ssharpp1d4d84; cursor: pointer; history-repeat: no-repeat; heritage-size: incorporate; heritage-position: right; .SubDriveRevBot:hover background-color: ssharpp245996; transition: 0.4s linear; .SubDriveRevBot a colour: ssharppfff; display: block; width: one hundred%; height: one hundred%; .SubDriveRevBot a:hover coloration: ssharppfff; .SubDriveRevBot .Titlerr background: rgba(30, 41, fifty one, 0.Sixty three); padding: 10px 20px 7px; color: ssharppfff; letter-spacing: -0.1px; display: block; border-radius: 3px; font-size: 0.9em; .SubDriveRevBot .Statement font-weight: 500; color: ssharppf29f26; font-own family: Roboto; .SubDriveRevBot .Remarknew font-weight: 500; color: ssharppfea; font-family: Roboto; .SubDriveRevBot .Bulll margin-bottom: 5px !Critical; padding: 15px 5px If you enjoy our content, please consider subscribing.

• Ad-unfastened TechSpot experience while assisting our paintings
• Our promise: All reader contributions will cross towards investment extra content
• That means: More tech capabilities, extra benchmarks and evaluation