AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs. Intel Core i9-14900K



It's time to take an up to date look at the gaming performance of the Core i9-14900K and Ryzen 7 7800X3D, comparing head-to-head AMD and Intel's best gaming processors to see which one you should buy. We've were given a range of latest video games to test with, a number of which have received performance patches that we've got but to test together with Starfield, so we're keen to peer how these two evaluate.

As it stands now, you should buy the i9-14900K for $580, at the same time as the 13900K, that's the identical CPU, charges $550. Then there's the 13900KF for $520. On the alternative side of the table, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has an MSRP of $450, however in recent times you can locate it for as little as $360, making it considerably less expensive than the Core i9.

It's really worth noting that the Core i9 is a much more effective productivity CPU. So, if you are entering into some middle-heavy work as well as gaming, then the Intel processor is probably a better choice. AMD's counteroffer there may be the 7950X3D for ~$six hundred, which is frequently quicker for productiveness workloads and can technically healthy the gaming overall performance of the 7800X3D – if the thread scheduling is operating – which is not the case.

So, the 7950X3D isn't always an ideal solution, even though its overall performance is typically superb. Today's cognizance is on gaming, and for that, the 7800X3D is a much higher match in our opinion.

For trying out, the 7800X3D changed into set up at the Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master using BIOS version F20a, together with DDR5-6000 CL30 reminiscence. Meanwhile, the 14900K changed into benchmarked on the MSI MPG Z790 Carbon Wi-Fi using BIOS version 7D89v19 (we need to marvel, MSI, why do your BIOS revisions should sound like they can be a 32" 4K 144Hz display?)...

The Intel system is also using DDR5-7200 memory, and for photographs, we've got the Asus ROG Strix RTX 4090 OC Edition used for benchmarking at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K.

Benchmarks

Starting with Assassin's Creed Mirage, this recreation has seen pretty some patches on account that our final take a look at. There have also been a few GeForce driver updates. Compared to our 14900K evaluate facts, the Intel processor's overall performance has advanced slightly, even as the 7800X3D sees a 9% discount. We're no longer sure why that is, however as normal, we triple-checked the statistics, and it now seems AMD and Intel processors are extra evenly matched on this title.

Another parameter it really is changed here is the BIOS revision, so it would be very hard to pinpoint the reason of Ryzen's overall performance regression. At the cease of the day, each processors are pushing the RTX 4090 to over one hundred ninety fps at 1440p, which is probably correct enough.

The 7800X3D's performance in Cyberpunk 2077 progressed with the Phantom Liberty update – nicely, it turned into genuinely the 2.Zero replace, but they came about at approximately the same time. Anyway, the 7800X3D now plays virtually properly on this name, beating the 14900K by way of a 12% margin at 1080p, though each had been GPU restrained to 150 fps at 1440p after which 77 fps at 4K.

Next up, we've got Horizon Zero Dawn, wherein the 7800X3D turned into once more capable of beat the i9, handing over 12% more overall performance at 1080p and 10% extra at 1440p. Interestingly, even at 4K, the AMD processor had a moderate overall performance gain, although we are most effective speakme approximately a 4% margin here.

Moving on to the Far Cry 6 outcomes, we again locate the 7800X3D out in the front, presenting 12% more frames at 1080p and 8% extra at 1440p. Truth be advised, though, each CPUs are remarkable right here, as you would count on.

Performance in F1 23 is first rate, and this one is close sufficient to call a tie because the 7800X3D turned into just three% faster at 1080p, so a negligible distinction there.

ACC is a recreation where the 3D V-Cache makes a huge distinction, dramatically boosting frame costs. So plenty in order that the 14900K can not genuinely compete, regardless of delivering superb gaming overall performance. Still, the 7800X3D is round 27% faster at 1080p and 1440p, which is a big overall performance uplift, and even at 4K, the Ryzen processor is still imparting thirteen% more performance.

The 7800X3D stays dominant in Watch Dogs: Legion, allowing the RTX 4090 to render up to fifteen% greater frames at 1080p. The 1440p outcomes quickly have become GPU confined, ensuing in a trifling four% uplift for the Ryzen processor after which, of course, no difference at 4K.

Testing with A Plague Tale: Requiem, we see that the 7800X3D is providing a nine% overall performance bump at 1080p and 6% at 1440p before the game becomes closely GPU certain at 4K. Again, each CPUs are delivering fantastically proper overall performance here, so although the 7800X3D is quicker, for this particular name, both are greater than fast sufficient.

Next up, we have Star Wars Jedi: Survivor, and both CPUs again perform relatively properly in this identify, delivering sturdy 1% lows of over 150 fps at 1080p. Performance common is close to enough to name same, so no clean winner here.

Do you want a hundred and seventy fps to play Baldur's Gate 3? We don't think so, however with the 7800X3D you may acquire it, or one hundred sixty fps with the 14900K. Both appear pretty precise to us, however the Ryzen processor become 7% faster, so some other win here for AMD.

Moving directly to the Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III consequences, and right here we are the use of the built-in benchmark. Oddly, at the same time as the 14900K and 7800X3D are very lightly matched for the common frame rate, the Ryzen processor supplied a good deal better 1% lows, as much as 31% higher in fact.

Even whilst maxed out, Resident Evil four is CPU restrained at 1080p and possibly 1440p. The 7800X3D became 7% faster, so a minor development with the AMD processor. But again, with each rendering over 160 fps, performance became incredible.

Next, we've Shadow of the Tomb Raider, which isn't always exactly a new recreation, however it's still one of the most CPU traumatic video games we've got come across. Testing within the village segment of the sport, we determined that the 7800X3D become eight% quicker when comparing the common body price and 12% quicker for the 1% lows. However, at 1440p, the 1% low margin multiplied to 19%, as the 14900K drops off greater than the 7800X3D does on the better decision.

The Callisto Protocol offers us with a rare instance of the 14900K beating the 7800X3D, wherein the Intel processor is as much as thirteen% faster, visible whilst comparing 1% lows at 1080p. Even at 4K, the Intel CPU reclaimed a slight lead, so a win across the board right here for the i9.

Total War: Warhammer III would not seem to want either CPU, with overall performance being same at all three examined resolutions. Therefore, there is not an awful lot to speak about right here, and we are able to rapidly flow alongside.

Hogwarts Legacy with ray tracing enabled is brutal, as we are looking at less than eighty fps at 1080p the use of an RTX 4090. The 7800X3D turned into up to 8% quicker, however we're speaking approximately a four fps distinction, so overall performance become very similar the use of either CPU.

Upon launch, the 13900K changed into 20% faster than the 7800X3D in Starfield, which seemed sudden, but that become the initial overall performance. Thankfully, Ryzen's susceptible performance on this title changed into addressed with a sport update, and now the 7800X3D kind of fits the 14900K, trailing with the aid of some frames when comparing the common body fee however also delivering barely higher 1% lows. Competitive overall performance overall.

The 14900K additionally nudged beforehand by means of a small margin in The Last of Us Part I, with 1% lows being eight% stronger at 1080p, which is an affordable margin. Interestingly, the 7800X3D nudged ahead with the aid of a few frames at 1440p and even 4K, but average, we are searching on the same gaming enjoy the use of either CPU.

Like among the video games we've checked out, performance in Halo Infinite is very similar the use of either processor. The 7800X3D nudged in advance at 1080p with higher 1% lows, however universal, we are searching at a similar revel in on this one.

Hitman 3 has usually delivered the exceptional effects with an Intel processor, and nothing has modified here, with the 14900K rendering 6% extra frames at 1080p earlier than the effects come to be closely GPU restrained at 1440p and, of direction, 4K.

Last up, we've Spider-Man Remastered, where the 7800X3D is 7% quicker than the 14900K, rendering 167 fps on average instead of 156 fps. With ray tracing enabled, this game is extraordinarily CPU confined, that's why we're looking at very similar frame costs in any respect 3 examined resolutions.

Performance Summary

We've taken a examine the 21 video games tested, and it appears the 7800X3D did get the better of the 14900K, though standard, the distinction wasn't considerable.

To discover exactly how they examine, we'll examine the margins on a consistent with-recreation basis and average it out. Don't worry, we realize what we're doing…

At the 1080p resolution, as expected, the 7800X3D and 14900K are very lightly matched, with the Ryzen processor quicker through just five% on average. There had been some examples of double-digit margins and one excessive instance in ACC, however as the 5% average indicates, normally we are searching at unmarried-digit margins.

At the slightly greater GPU-restrained 1440p resolution, the overall margin is even smaller, just four% right here.

Then, we've the 4K records, which, in our opinion, is not very valuable for CPU trying out. It's frequently closely asked, however when benchmarking the GPU, the CPU doesn't genuinely depend in nearly all games, because you are typically GPU restricted.

Power Consumption

Now, we need to talk about power intake. While the gaming overall performance between the 7800X3D and 14900K is very similar, and albeit not really worth traumatic about, strength usage does differ drastically.

When measuring total device electricity consumption whilst gaming, the Core i9 consumed 30% greater energy, despite being slightly slower standard.

We're speaking approximately an extra one hundred thirty watts on common right here, that is a substantial distinction for the CPU to make. One problem may be the power bill, which is not a huge deal anywhere, at least no longer for people buying excessive-cease CPUs and GPUs.

A bigger situation even though for the ones of us dwelling in warmer climates, is warmth output. Dumping an additional one hundred thirty watts into your room for the same or slightly lower gaming overall performance is less than perfect. At the very least, your air conditioner will experience the effect.

And the Fastest Gaming CPU is...

Let's now weigh the pros and cons of every choice, and we will start with the Ryzen 7 7800X3D, searching at this from the perspective of a gamer in search of high-stop overall performance.

The execs for the 7800X3D consist of fantastic gaming performance, arguably magnificence-leading, first rate energy efficiency – it's a no-fuss answer – delivering out-of-the-container performance without the need to worry approximately reminiscence timings. It's easy to maintain cool, never throttles regardless of a basic cooler, and AM5 motherboards at the moment are usually very cheap. The AM5 platform gives an improve direction, and it is now very cost-effective for a high-give up gaming CPU, losing as little as $360.

As for the cons, what are some of the drawbacks of the 7800X3D as a gaming CPU, in particular relative to the 14900K? We admit, we sat at our table seeking to give you one actual downside, and nothing got here to thoughts.

The quality answer we could give you was platform compatibility. If you're on AM4, as an instance, you'll want to buy a new motherboard and reminiscence to improve to the 7800X3D. However, most shoppers of the 14900K will face the same trouble. So, the most important drawback of the 7800X3D is its lack of compatibility with older platforms.

We're no longer announcing the 7800X3D is best. If you are also tackling core-heavy workloads, the 14900K will outperform it, and for that on AM5, you're higher served via the 7950X3D, which has its own set of scheduling issues. But for gaming, the 7800X3D is nearly flawless.

What about Intel's Core i9-14900K? The apparent pro is that it's very speedy for each gaming and productivity. Overclocking headroom is basically non-existent however you do have a more diploma of memory tuning available which could improve performance, even though you will often spend greater time tuning the memory than you will clearly gaming, and validating stability is a real pain.

Other than that, we are no longer positive what the 14900K does higher than the 7800X3D. The cons consist of terrible strength utilization, with undervolting nevertheless falling short of Ryzen's efficiency. Ideally, a 360mm AIO or higher is needed to keep away from throttling, in particular for productiveness, as it's a totally hot unit. The LGA 1700 platform is also lifeless, so your next improve will without question require a brand new motherboard, and even in case you don't care approximately the monetary funding, it is greater of a ache to improve.

To make the 14900K viable, it wishes undervolting, reminiscence tuning, and proper silicon first-class. Getting the 14900K to regularly beat the 7800X3D in video games is a task, it's a life-style desire, so in case you need to spend greater time inside the BIOS than you do gaming, it could be a number of amusing.

In all seriousness, inventory the 14900K is a completely rapid gaming CPU, genuinely just like the 7800X3D. However, its excessive electricity usage and the end-of-existence platform are extensive drawbacks. But of path, we adore hearing your comments, so allow us to realize what you observed.

Shopping Shortcuts:

• AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D on Amazon
• Intel Core i9-14900K on Amazon
• AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D on Amazon
• Intel Core i7-14700K on Amazon
• AMD Ryzen 9 7900X on Amazon
• Intel Core i5-14600K on Amazon
• AMD Ryzen 9 7950X on Amazon

.SubDriveRevBot margin: 30px zero 0px; border-radius: 3px; line-top: 1.5; font-size: zero.9em; shade: ssharppfff; historical past-coloration: ssharpp1d4d84; cursor: pointer; history-repeat: no-repeat; background-length: comprise; background-role: right; .SubDriveRevBot:hover heritage-shade: ssharpp245996; transition: 0.4s linear; .SubDriveRevBot a shade: ssharppfff; show: block; width: a hundred%; top: 100%; .SubDriveRevBot a:hover colour: ssharppfff; .SubDriveRevBot .Titlerr background: rgba(30, forty one, fifty one, 0.Sixty three); padding: 10px 20px 7px; shade: ssharppfff; letter-spacing: -0.1px; show: block; border-radius: 3px; font-size: zero.9em; .SubDriveRevBot .Observation font-weight: 500; colour: ssharppf29f26; font-own family: Roboto; .SubDriveRevBot .Remarknew font-weight: 500; coloration: ssharppfea; font-own family: Roboto; .SubDriveRevBot .Bulll margin-backside: 5px !Critical; padding: 15px 5px If you experience our content material, please consider subscribing.

• Ad-loose TechSpot enjoy whilst helping our work
• Our promise: All reader contributions will pass toward investment extra content material
• That approach: More tech capabilities, more benchmarks and analysis