Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 vs. RTX 4060 Ti 16GB: Is It Worth Spending the Extra $a hundred?



Today, we're comparing the GeForce RTX 4070 head-to-head with the extra lower priced RTX 4060 Ti 16GB GPU. Recently, pricing for each of those GPUs have seen an adjustment, the former losing to $550 from the preliminary $six hundred MSRP, while the the 16GB 4060 Ti has taken a comparable reduce from $500 to the contemporary $450 retail rate.

This is partially explained as Nvidia reacting to the latest introduction of the Radeon RX 7800 XT.

Speaking of which, if you have a budget of round $400 to $six hundred for a brand new photos card, we fantastically propose exploring the 7800 XT. We perceive it as the first-rate cost on this fee range currently. However, in case you in particular need a GeForce GPU, your choices are the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB and RTX 4070.

With a rate tag of $450, the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is 25% greater low-cost than the RTX 4070. Nevertheless, most fashions stay closer to the $500 MSRP, making them simply 17% less high priced. This is still an attractive cut price, and one benefit is that the RTX 4060 Ti offers extra VRAM.

However, it comes with 26% fewer CUDA cores, an eleven% lower in L2 cache, and because of slower reminiscence and a narrower reminiscence bus, bandwidth has dwindled by a large forty three%. This indicates there might be conditions where the 4060 Ti considerably lags at the back of.

For our exams, we've got used a Ryzen 7 7800X3D paired with the Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master and 32GB of DDR5-6000 CL30 reminiscence. We will in brief speak the statistics for about 1/2 a dozen titles earlier than delving into comprehensive assessment graphs. The resolutions of hobby right here are 1080p, 1440p and 4K. In total, we've tested fifty six configurations. As usually, all information supplied is current and updated for this presentation. Let's dive in...

Benchmarks

Starting with F1 23, we discover that at 1080p, the 4070 is 20% faster, however then 30% quicker at 1440p and 4K. This is a reasonable final results for the 4060 Ti 16GB, specially considering the 4070 is now 33% extra luxurious.

When ray tracing is enabled with the extremely-high preset, the 4070 boasts a 33% benefit at 1080p, 32% at 1440p, and 30% at 4K – margins quite much like what we found using the high preset.

In Hogwarts Legacy, the scaling is comparable. The RTX 4070 is as much as 32% faster, in particular substantial at 4K.

With ray tracing activated, we enjoy CPU barriers at 1080p using the RTX 4070, making it merely 12% faster than the 4060 Ti. However, this gap widens to forty two% at 1440p. At 4K, overall performance for both GPUs is disappointing, despite the fact that the 4060 Ti does area ahead, possibly due to its extra 4GB of VRAM.

In The Last of Us Part 1, the 4070 delivered 29% greater frames at 1080p, 35% greater at 1440p, and 21% greater at 4K. It seems that VRAM capability is probably a proscribing thing for the 4070 at 4K, explaining the narrower performance gap.

In Star Wars Jedi: Survivor, the RTX 4070 changed into 30% faster at 1080p, 28% quicker at 1440p, and 29% faster at 4K, displaying consistent scaling across the tested resolutions.

With ray tracing enabled, the 4070 turned into 23% faster at 1080p. Potential CPU boundaries may be influencing those effects, especially because the overall performance gap extends to 37% at 1440p.

Dying Light 2 seems to be reminiscence-touchy. Here, the 4070 showcases a significant 39% performance enhancement at 1080p and 1440p and 44% at 4K.

With ray tracing activated, the 4070 is 28% quicker at 1080p, 35% at 1440p, and 37% at 4K.

In Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart, the RTX 4070 exhibited a number of the bigger margins we've cited. It turned into 38% faster at 1080p, forty two% faster at 1440p, and forty four% faster at 4K.

In Fortnite, we observed a 29% overall performance uplift at 1080p, 28% at 1440p, and 30% at 4K – showing steady scaling.

With ray tracing on, the uplift changed into nonetheless 33% at both 1080p and 1440p, and a good sized 41% at 4K.

Performance Summary

We've just reviewed facts from some of the forty games examined, each with and with out RT enabled. Now, we will examine how those GPUs examine across all the tested games, beginning with the 1080p facts…

At 1080p, the RTX 4070 changed into, on average, 26% faster, with a few margins accomplishing 39%. Regrettably, video games like CSGO, Apex Legends, Spider Man with RT, and Hogwarts Legacy with RT are all CPU-confined. Additionally, Death Stranding has a 240 fps frame cap, which also constrains the 4070 at this decision. Excluding those elements, the 4070 averages a 28% faster performance.

Focusing on ray tracing results, the 4070 became 25% quicker on common, intently aligning with the combined workload graph.

Raising the resolution to 1440p offers a clearer contrast. Here, the 4070 widens its lead, being 31% quicker on average, with numerous instances of 40% or greater improvements.

When isolating ray tracing effects at this resolution, the 4070 averaged 32% better performance.

At 4K, the 4070 became, on common, 33% quicker. The handiest uncommon outcome turned into in Hogwarts Legacy, where the 4070's 12GB VRAM buffer become exceeded, leading to a performance dip.

Inspecting only the 4K ray tracing records, the 4070 turned into 29% faster on common, with the Hogwarts Legacy result being the primary exception.

What We Learned

The GeForce RTX 4070 is on common 30% faster than the 4060 Ti 16GB – and may be as lots as forty to 45% quicker, relying on the game and first-class settings. That manner if you had been to buy these GPUs based on their new reduced charges, the RTX 4070 could cost simply 22% extra, making it by using a long way the higher value alternative.

However, the charge reductions are not always normal yet, with the $50 discount hitting certain 4060 Ti 16GB fashions, and additionally a few RTX 4070 now imparting the advanced pricing. It's clear the 7800 XT has located some downwards pressure on 4070 pricing (thanks Radeon!). As always, GPU pricing has a tendency to be quite volatile and pricing to your place could range wildly to what we are seeing within the US.

In brief, if the RTX 4070 is priced at much less than a 30% top class, it deserves attention over the 4060 Ti 16GB.

In Australia, the maximum inexpensive in-inventory RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is to be had for $760 AUD, while the RTX 4070 goes for $900 AUD. This is most effective an 18% growth, suggesting Australians shouldn't entertain the concept of opting for the 4060 Ti.

The sole gain of the RTX 4060 Ti lies in its large 16GB VRAM buffer. While we accept as true with this ought to be a standard configuration for merchandise priced over $400, 12GB ought to suffice for the foreseeable future.

A few additional facet notes...

ssharpp1: Reducing the rate of the 16GB 4060 Ti to $450 has not simply made it a aggressive alternative to the RTX 4070, but has also made the 8GB base version totally redundant at $four hundred. You'd be crazy no longer to pay the 13% premium for doubling the VRAM, as that'll almost truly show to be a worthwhile investment within the close to future.

ssharpp2: Regarding DLSS three Frame Generation, we've got visible feedback suggesting hobby in comparisons of diverse GeForce GPUs using the frame gen era. However, there may be a cause we don't go there. The era operates further on an RTX 4060 and an RTX 4090. Thus, the scaling stays constant; all supporting GPUs gain identical frame smoothing outcomes, with the only difference being the beginning frame fee.

To wrap up, it really is how the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB and RTX 4070 stack up throughout a wide spectrum of games. The RTX 4070 is normally ~30% quicker, so that you recognise how an awful lot inexpensive the 4060 Ti will have to be before it will become a better price alternative.

Shopping Shortcuts:

• Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 on Amazon
• AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT on Amazon
• Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 Ti on Amazon
• Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti on Amazon
• AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT on Amazon
• Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 on Amazon
• AMD Radeon RX 7600 on Amazon
• AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX on Amazon

.SubDriveRevBot margin: 30px 0 0px; border-radius: 3px; line-peak: 1.Five; font-size: 0.9em; coloration: ssharppfff; background-colour: ssharpp1d4d84; cursor: pointer; heritage-repeat: no-repeat; history-size: incorporate; background-position: proper; .SubDriveRevBot:hover historical past-shade: ssharpp245996; transition: zero.4s linear; .SubDriveRevBot a shade: ssharppfff; display: block; width: a hundred%; top: one hundred%; .SubDriveRevBot a:hover colour: ssharppfff; .SubDriveRevBot .Titlerr heritage: rgba(30, 41, 51, 0.Sixty three); padding: 10px 20px 7px; shade: ssharppfff; letter-spacing: -zero.1px; display: block; border-radius: 3px; font-size: zero.9em; .SubDriveRevBot .Statement font-weight: 500; colour: ssharppf29f26; font-family: Roboto; .SubDriveRevBot .Remarknew font-weight: 500; color: ssharppfea; font-circle of relatives: Roboto; .SubDriveRevBot .Bulll margin-bottom: 5px !Vital; padding: 15px 5px If you revel in our content, please remember subscribing.

• Ad-unfastened TechSpot revel in even as helping our work
• Our promise: All reader contributions will pass in the direction of investment more content
• That manner: More tech capabilities, more benchmarks and evaluation