https://safirsoft.com Scarlett Johansson sues Disney, says Disney Plus release breaks contract with Black Widow

Lawsuit: Marvel star gets promise of exclusive in-theatre broadcasts and slashes ticket sales. .

The simultaneous release allowed Disney to pay Johansson less money because he and Disney-owned Marvel agreed that his compensation for Black Widow would "largely depend on the box office receipts generated by the picture." In Los Angeles County Superior Court for the State of California. This was a breach of contract because Johansson promised Marvel that the film would initially be shown only in cinemas, as stated in the petition:

To maximize these receipts and thus protect his financial interests, Ms. Stage show". As Ms. Johansson, Disney, Marvel, and most of the others in Hollywood know, the "Theater Show" is a unique show in the world's cinemas. Disney was well aware of this promise, but nonetheless forced Marvel to drop its commitment and instead publish the image on the Disney+ distribution service on the same day it was released in theaters.

There were two reasons for this. . Initially, Disney wanted to shift viewers away from theaters to its streaming service, where it could maintain revenue while increasing Disney+ subscribers, a proven way to boost Disney stock prices. Second, Disney wanted to devalue Ms. Johansson's deal and enrich itself. In the months leading up to the lawsuit, Ms. Johansson gave Disney and Marvel every opportunity to make up for their mistake and make good on Marvel's promise. Unlike many other movie studios, including Warner Bros. Johansson, who, according to information and beliefs, dealt with their talents in films like Wonder Woman after the release of "Day and Day" on HBO Max last year - Disney and Marvel He largely ignored Ms. Johansson and forced her to do so.

The lawsuit alleges that Disney intentionally interfered with the relationship and caused a breach of contract, claiming that the breach of contract was a direct result of Disney ordering Marvel to ignore Ms. Johansson's agreement and/or "ignoring Marvel's demands for compliance." Johansson's lawsuit may be the first of its kind against Disney, as actress Emma Stone is said to have sued Disney over the release of Cruella at Disney+, according to Screen Rant.

>

Disney accuses Johansson of 'seriousness'. Ignore the "pandemic

Disney responded to the complaint with a statement to the deadline. There is no benefit. This case is particularly worrying and troubling in light of the severe and long-term global consequences of COVID-19. Disney has fully complied with Ms. Johansson's contract, and in addition , the release of Black Widow on Disney+ with Premier Access increased its ability to receive more than $20 million in additional compensation received so far.” Despite Disney’s claim that Jawa E. Johansson launched “additional compensation” online, “Person” said. Familiar with details of his contract to the Wall Street Journal said "Disney's decision to release the film to Disney+ is more than $.50 million for Ms. Johansson."

In response to Disney's statement, Johansson's representative Brian Lord said the company "has accused Ms. Johansson is rudely and erroneously spreading the epidemic. The covid world is insensitive, trying to make it look like a person, and I know it isn't, so let's move on to the definition of "broad theatre." And in cinemas, the picture (less than 1500 screens)."Both sides, as well as Disney, realized that This means that the image was initially released exclusively in cinemas and remained exclusively in cinemas for 90 to 120 days. That nearly 90" 120-day theater window was not only standard at the time the contract was concluded, but also record for previous Disney Marvel films distributed, including those starring Ms. Johansson. "Johansson's contract" assured him of compensation. Fixed "plus" deferred compensation and bonuses directly linked to worldwide box office receipts. At the launch of Disney Plus in November 2019, Marvel's chief counsel responded in May 2019: "We fully understand that Scarlett's desire to make the film and her entire deal is based on premise That the film, like our other pictures, is widely theatrical. We understand that in the event of a program change, we need to discuss this with you and reach an agreement as this agreement is based on a set of (very substantial) box office rewards. “

Marvel’s statement that a Black Widow theater show would be like us” stated in the lawsuit.

“At the time the agreement was signed, both parties understood it well, and Disney says a “theatrical performance” will be the show. The exclusive in movie theaters for a long time, between about 90 and 120, was a day, he points out. “According to the court, previous Marvel Studios films had between 82 and 159 days of uninterrupted theater window,” and all seven previous Marvel Johansson films had at least 96 days of theater.

None of Johansson's previous Marvel films had included "daily" releases on operating systems that streamed on Black Widow; In the case of those films, it took six to eight months for the Marvel Studios films to become available for release. SVOD [Video-On-Demand Sharing] Like Disney Plus Receives $30 + Disney+ Ads for Black Widow

Disney has announced Black Widow online and will be released in theaters simultaneously in March 2021 With a one-time fee of $30 for Disney users. It was ignored, no decision was made, and the image was simultaneously released in theaters and on Disney+ Premier Access on July 9, 2021. “This agreement successfully removed millions of fans from theaters and continued the Disney Plus distribution service.” According to a congratulatory press release from Disney. The photo made over $60 million in its first weekend on Disney + Premier Access alone.” The lawsuit alleges that Marvel (and thus Disney) savings were "overstated" from money otherwise owed to Ms. Johansson. Disney stock prices rose 4 percent in the days after the announcement, and company executives are likely to benefit from the streaming service's success. This strategy will personally benefit from their own misbehavior and that of Disney. In fiscal year 2021, Disney CEO Robert Chappak received $3.8 double his base salary. According to the Disney Compensation Committee (described in the company's 2021 annual report), the main reason for receiving the award was that Chappak "was quick to plan new offerings on DTC [direct-to-consumer] and linear channels." And we launched direct customer service in several key markets. Mr. Chappak's predecessor, Robert Iger, also received the vast majority of his compensation - just over $16.5 million - in the form of stock grants. The reason she was awarded the Mammoth Award (according to the same annual report) was that she "successfully launched Disney Plus and caused an unexpected increase in preceded in subscriber count in its first year.” In short, the message to — and from — Disney executives was clear: Increase Disney+ subscribers, ignore contract promises, and you'll be rewarded.

In support of Johansson's claim that he forced Disney Marvel over its infringement, the lawsuit alleges an article in February 2021 in which Variety stated that Marvel CEO Kevin “Fige opposes a hybrid show” but “Disney powers still can convince “Fige to change his position.” Or another month, less than a week before the launch Disney+, we'll probably get in touch at the last minute, depending on how those movies come to market, whether it's Black Widow or some other title... We'll get in touch with you "we'll monitor carefully and make contact in an emergency."" The lawsuit states. Widow on Disney+ only after a normal theater window.

Scarlett Johansson sues Disney, says Disney Plus release breaks contract with Black Widow
scarlett-johansson-sues-disney-says-disney-plus-release.html

https://safirsoft.com Emails show Elizabeth Holmes responding to the failed Theranos trials

Emails show Elizabeth Holmes responding to the failed Theranos trials

The laboratory director was pressured to defend the company's findings against the doctors.










https://safirsoft.com Facebook halts Instagram Kids launch as a circle of critics

Facebook halts Instagram Kids launch as a circle of critics

Opposition to the new photo-sharing platform for children under 13 has grown in Washington. The project accelerated in Washington.

...
https://safirsoft.com According to the lawsuit, PD in Auckland ignores supervision law

According to the lawsuit, PD in Auckland ignores supervision law

A major proponent of the Auckland law in 2018 says the city is not following the rules.

In 2018, Auckland passed a law allowing citizens to u...

https://safirsoft.com He escaped from the dark web's largest statue. Now it's back

He escaped from the dark web's largest statue. Now it's back

It appears that DeSnake has given up on AlphaBay and now intends to revive it. Thai police have arrested 26-year-old administrator of the site, Alexan...
https://safirsoft.com An old coal factory mining bitcoins for a utility company

An old coal factory mining bitcoins for a utility company

Bitcoin gives new life to another sick power plant.

High Energy Consumption Bitcoin is the dirty secret of this cryptocurrency. To mine bitco...

https://safirsoft.com Bitcoin Banned In China Because It Bans All Cryptocurrency Transactions

Bitcoin Banned In China Because It Bans All Cryptocurrency Transactions

This step comes at a time when the government is seeking to limit the repercussions of the real estate collapse.

China's crackdown on cryptoc...