Shareholders say the overpayment was a "quick cost statement".
The lawsuit also alleges that by denying information about the Cambridge leak Analytics, directors and members of the board of directors, including Zuckerberg and Cheryl Sandberg, COO, were involved in the local business. They were active.” After Zuckerberg learned of the massive extraction of Facebook user data by Cambridge Analytica, he and entities under his control accelerated the sale of shares And from Chancery, a number of pension funds and plaintiffs were among the plaintiffs, including the California Teachers' Retirement System, which manages more than $250 billion. And chapters, including Peter Thiel, Mark Anderson and Ian Kom, among others. Palantir Techno . Company logies, also called Thiel Big Data Analysis, that the lawsuit is based on a relationship between Palantir and Cambridge Analytica, citing Christopher Wiley's book, Revealed in 2019. Wiley reported that many Palantir employees, according to one of the company's chief information scientists, usually In the offices of K. Analytics operators worked “in person, during normal business hours”. "The two companies were closely related, as the Stanford Daily reported in April 2018, Palantir acquired the Stanford Analytica brand." Palantir has reportedly taken steps to conceal the relationship. Till was one of former President Donald Trump's biggest supporters in the run-up to the 2016 election. The Trump campaign and Trump's PACs hired Cambridge Analytica to help with digital operations.
Zuckerberg, Till, and the Trump administration seem to have had a deep relationship. In October 2019, Zuckerberg reportedly met with Thiel, Trump and Jared Kushner at the White House. "Till later told one of his secrets that Zuckerberg had reached an agreement with Kushner over lunch," Max Chafkin said in part of his new book. "Facebook promised him that he would continue to refrain from political statements to investigate the truth." "If the company sticks to its promise, the Trump administration will drop any strict regulations. After dinner, Zuckerberg took an idealistic approach to conservative websites." Distorted image
Events over the past few years - from the Cambridge Analytica scandal to the platform's role in the US Congressional uprising in January - have tarnished Facebook's public image. Zuckerberg appears to want to change that, and the New York Times reports that he has personally signed at least three new designs, including one known as Project Amplify, which integrates Facebook's PR into user feeds.Advertising
Reading more from Facebook reveals top posts but doesn't share basic information about incorrect information. The Times reported that executives from various divisions of the company, including the marketing, communications, policy and integrity teams, are involved. The main driver of the changes is Alex Schultz, Facebook's chief marketing officer, although Zuckerberg says he has endorsed them all. Schultz was apparently the driving force behind efforts to restrict researchers and journalists' access to data. Instead, he chose to publish his report on Facebook, and the first report came out only last month. The first report was reportedly dropped due to concerns that higher site engagement in that quarter may have contributed to the suspected COVID vaccine.
Another initiative, known as Project Amplify, is said to be injecting pro-Facebook content into people's news feeds. Facebook spokesperson Joe Osborne denied any changes to the News Feed ranking algorithm. But according to the New York Times, these changes may not be necessary. The company is said to be using a tool known as Quick Promote to inject content, which includes links to articles written by Facebook or third parties that portray the company favorably. PR posts are marked with small Facebook logos. Osborne said the posts "are similar to the corporate responsibility initiatives that people see in other technologies and consumer products," a statement that disproves the fact that most other companies cannot reach more than two billion people.
The company insists that many of the recent stories that have been written about it — from the article featuring Project Amplify to the Wall Street Journal's wide reach — are false. "These stories contain intentional misrepresentations of what we are trying to do," Nick Clegg, Facebook's vice president of global affairs, wrote in a blog post. p>
If Facebook is really out of context using itself to improve the image, more positive stories are expected in the news feed in the coming months: The Washington Post reports that the whistleblower behind the Wall Street Journal group has relayed documents to lawmakers. The person intends to announce it by the end of the year, possibly by testimony in the Senate. p>
Facebook owes $4.9 billion more than Fuck needs to protect Zuckerberg
Four days ago, the ransomware website REvil, better known as "...
There is a saying in the startup world that many companies are trying to sh...
Last month, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger took to the podium on a foggy and win...