Testifying before the Senate, Francis Hagen said the reform of Section 230 is just the beginning. The social media giant is responsible for its algorithms that promote content based on the interaction received in users' news.
If we had proper oversight, or if we amended [section] 230 so that Facebook would be responsible for the consequences of deliberate rating decisions, I think they would do away with participatory ratings. "Because it makes teens more vulnerable to anorexia, it separates families, and in places like Ethiopia, it literally incites ethnic violence."
Read more In the interview, Haugen says a distinction is made between user-generated content and Facebook's algorithms that prioritize and contribute content to the news feed. Writers should not be held responsible for the content that users post on their platforms, but should take responsibility when their algorithms begin to make decisions about the content that users post to view.
The proposal reflects a bill in Congress that would protect Americans from dangerous algorithms.
Despite the call for reform in Section 230, Haugen also cautioned that reform alone "requires the gravity of the crisis from us to go beyond previous regulations." Outdated privacy protections or changes to Section 230 will not be enough.” Facebook before leaving the company in May. The former product manager has turned over files to Congress and the Securities and Exchange Commission and is seeking whistleblower support. He has filed eight complaints with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Including allegations that Facebook paid advertisers too much and misled investors about the number of users. According to him, the company had not previously talked about the nature of the problems it was facing. "Facebook wants you to believe that the problems we are talking about are unsolvable," Haugen said. They want you to believe in the wrong choices.”Advertising
Read more investors on Facebook mislead them about reducing users, former employee claims: “They want you to believe you have to choose between a Facebook full of divisive content The condenser or one of them will lose the important values of our country on which it is based: freedom of expression. "You have to choose between public monitoring of Facebook's choices and your personal privacy. In order to be able to share fun photos of your kids with old friends, you also have to catch a grumpy virus. They want you to believe that's only part of the agreement.
"I'm here today to tell you that this Not right. These problems are solvable. Social media is safer, more respectful of freedom of expression, and more enjoyable. “I believe in the potential of Facebook,” he said. "We can have our favorite social media, connecting us without violating our democracy, putting our children at risk, and using racial violence around the world." We can do better. p>
Algorithmic Choices< p> Time and time again, the session returns to problems caused by the proliferation of algorithms and artificial intelligence in Facebook's operations.
Reading more leaked documents reveals specific rules Facebook uses for the 5.8 million important people. Documents compiled by Facebook's Hagen show that interaction-based ranking algorithms prioritize divisive and intense content on this platform. To solve this problem, he said, Facebook uses artificial intelligence to find dangerous content before it is published. The problem is, "Facebook's own research says they can't detect enough dangerous content. Protect the damage they know is in their system. They gave news and a timeline on the algorithm. Hagen didn't think that was enough." I'm worried if Facebook is allowed By choosing users: do you want a sharing-based news item or a newscast… do people choose a more addictive option, ranking based on interaction, even if it’s girls’ If we want to have an informed conversation about the effects of social media on young people, it’s important that It begins with a full picture. We are committed to doing more research ourselves and making more research available to the public.”
Despite his promise of the “full picture,” Zuckerberg has not committed to publishing all of Facebook's research or opening its platforms to study by researchers who haven't been. hired or funded by the company.” Last week, the company selectively published its research to get a better picture of what’s happening on its platforms.” That’s not being able to see real Facebook systems and assert that they act as communications like the Department of Transportation that regulates cars only through a Watching them move on the highway," Haugen called on senators to set up an organization. Consider a government that scrutinizes social media platforms and gives regulators more insight into the company's internal performance.
"No regulator today has a no-issue with Facebook list, because Facebook didn't want to sufficiently know the cause of these problems. Otherwise, the whistleblower would not have been needed."
A Facebook whistleblower tells the Senate that algorithms shouldn't be protected under Section 230
Four days ago, the ransomware website REvil, better known as "...
There is a saying in the startup world that many companies are trying to sh...
Last month, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger took to the podium on a foggy and win...