"Google has taken steps to shut down the competition ecosystem." Yesterday, dozens of prosecutors sued Google for its monopoly, claiming that the company was trying to "unblock" competing app stores (especially Samsung). Galaxy Store) and maintained its monopoly on the distribution of Android apps. p>
Read more Google Iron Control in Android: Open Source Control in Any Way Needed Despite Claims Google has repeatedly promised that Android will be the basis for an "open" ecosystem that can In it to industry participants, "Google wrote about the openness of Android, which caught the attention of lawyers. They can compete freely." “Google has not kept its promise. Instead, Google has taken steps to shut down the competition ecosystem and present itself as an intermediary between app developers and consumers.”
Some of the allegations against Google will be familiar to anyone who has sued Epic against Apple. The lawsuit also alleges that forcing app developers to use Google Play accounts for in-app purchases is illegal, restrictive and anti-competitively. “Google wanted to bring countless advantages and advantages to Samsung in order to prevent the creation of the Samsung Galaxy Store,” the report said. Although the Galaxy Store was not as popular as the Play Store, Google feared that Samsung would become a strong competitor, especially since the company It developed most of its advanced Android phones.It sells in the US, Google was particularly concerned about Sa.Samsung acquired a store-specific game to attract more users, which Samsung did in 2018 in partnership with Epic to launch Fortnite exclusively on the App Store. Galaxy. This move alone has generated millions of dollars in revenue for Google.Advertising
Samsung appears to be seeking other monopolies with the developers of the "popular" app, despite having their names changed on file. If the Galaxy Store is targeted, the lawsuit alleges. The pressure of competition threatens the 30% commission Google has charged other developers.The Galaxy Store lawsuit claims that Google provided Samsung-exclusive game content, deals, and events on the Google Play Store and YouTube. It has even been suggested that the Play Store be named “White St. ore” device for the Galaxy so that Samsung can maintain its trademark.
In negotiations with Samsung, Google apparently preferred to pay a lump sum per revenue share rather than the one percent, which is the size of the Play Store. "Google was aware that if Samsung truly saw that Google was regaining control of the Google Play Store, it would be difficult to prevent Samsung from competing in the app distribution market," the lawsuit said.
Read more new Android OEM licenses leak. Opening has several limitations. Revenue sharing appears to be an often used tactic. Early in the history of Android, right after its launch, Google turned to device manufacturers and network operators, who built their own app stores on Android phones. The lawsuit alleges that Google "aims to discourage OEMs and MNOs from creating competing app stores." To do this, Google offered developers and network operators a share of ad revenue and app stores in exchange for a number of restrictions that would help ensure Google's dominance of the Android operating system. These include commitments that prevent companies from monopolizing Android and the Mobile App Distribution Agreement, which allows companies to use Google apps and APIs on Android devices. A few years ago, Mada also came under scrutiny by the European Commission. The new petition also states that companies that accept revenue sharing must put the Play Store on the homepage, ensure that it cannot be removed, and pledge that there is no other more prominent app store.
Google also claims that Google has used its dominance in search and advertising for the benefit of the Play Store. Apps sold on stores other than the Play Store may not purchase ads on Google search results pages, YouTube, and the Google Display Network. Because of these and other efforts, the Google Play Store distributes more than 90% of all Android apps, according to the lawsuit. p>
36 states claim Google "bought Samsung" to avoid competition in the App Store
Facebook is taking over social media by providing an easy w...