The big picture: For years, companies have been trying to improve the hiring process as much as possible using automation, but this has come to a point where many suitable job candidates are rejected due to its widespread use. Automated recruitment software, which is easier and more biased than humans. But while most hiring managers agree, the reliance on screening programs is so great that many are reluctant to look for alternative solutions.
Automation changes our lives more than we think, but sometimes it just doesn't deliver on its many promises. When companies try to find skilled workers, it seems that many potential candidates will never go through the first step in the hiring process - selecting their resume from a large number.
According to a study published by Harvard Business School, employers may have pushed automation too far in trying to process work schedules faster and more efficiently. The process, conducting initial reviews and scheduling interviews can be of great help, but it makes millions of potential candidates invisible to recruiters.
< p> Of course, there are other factors that make things difficult for people, but this study shows that automated recruitment of programs that use machine learning and natural language processing is the most effective. Less than 75% of US employers use these systems, while in countries like Germany and the UK, 54% and 58% use them, respectively. In the case of Fortune 500 companies, researchers have found that nearly all of them use a lot of automation in the hiring process.
Some of these automated systems are often filtered by filter, lead author Joseph Fuller told The Wall Street Journal. Based on poorly defined criteria, broad or irrelevant, it usually excludes those who need only additional training to perform the required role. Examples include hospitals that mention nursing volunteers on their resume or enter computer information, and retail stores list people who apply for a position in the store but don't mention "floors" as one, and they decline. skills.
The majority of employers - 88% - accept this, but most do not return to the traditional hiring process. Instead, they believe that automated systems can be improved over time. The notable exception is Amazon, which has employed more than 450,000 people since the start of the pandemic and initially struggled with automated recruitment programs. Meanwhile, the global recruitment technology market is set to reach $3.1 billion by 2025, roughly double the size it was a few years ago, so this is a new reality - a reality where you can't go through a company because an algorithm, not a human hire. I decided you weren't right.
Admin credit: Justin Metz
Automated recruitment systems prevent millions of good candidates from going through the front door