Ryzen 7 vs Core i7: 2700X vs 8700K review

Shopping Shortcuts:

To review the battle between the Core i7-8700K and the Ryzen 7 2700X, we'll compare today's data with what we found in 2018 to see if both processors have a better life. Additionally, we'll be testing alongside the new Core i7-11700K and the new Ryzen 7 5800X, so owners of older Core i7 and Ryzen 7 processors can see the value of this upgrade. # content-header.featured-image {position-position: bottom center; p Ryzen 7 vs. Core i7: 2700X vs. 8700K reviews

This one Easy to set up, so let's quickly review the system specs and get the results. All processors are configured with 32GB of dual-channel dual-channel DDR4-3200 CL14 memory. For the AM4 platform we used the MSI X570 Unify motherboard, while for the LGA1151 I used the Intel LGA1200 Gigabyte Z590 Aorus Master and Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra for the LGA1151. All boards use the latest available BIOS version.

For the graphics card, we're using the Radeon RX 6900 XT with all processors that use the Corsair iCUE H150i Elite Capellix liquid cooler. We tested 30 games in 1080p, 1440p and 4K resolution, and before we look at the usual data analysis, we'll look at information on dozens of titles. Benchmarks

We feel like a good place to start Battlefield V because the franchise is often used to compare the performance of these CPUs. Let me remind you that I tested the 8700K with a GTX 1080 Ti and it was compressing at 170fps, which was amazing at the time.

That was nearly the maximum of these components, in today's retest, we're still limited to an average of 167 fps, while the latest 11700K and 5800X models increase over 200 fps give.

The 8700K remains 17% faster at 1080p, although this time around the margin remains at 1440p, while before it nearly closed out with the GTX 1080 Ti. Margin is not removed with the RX 6900 XT until it reaches 4K. So for gamers who enjoy high refresh rates and are looking for maximum performance, the 8700K is still a better option, although the 2700X is also. The 2700X is also better than the 8700K. In an earlier feature 10700K, 11700K, and 5800S were used for comparison. The 2700X is about 40% slower than the 5800X, but only 14% slower than the 8700K.

Go to Watch Dogs: Legion We find that with 1080p the 8700K 19 is faster than the 2700X, which is very high, although it is worth noting that at 1440p this figure is 7% and Then with 4K it fell by about 2%. For those who play 1440p, you might not notice the difference between the 8700K and the 2700X, especially if you're not using the $1,000 6900 XT.

F1 2021 is another game where the all-new 2700X processors were used, but it's not too bad compared to the 8700K. Sure, Intel's 6-core/12-core CPU was still 15% faster, but it was well below the 5800X's 41% gain. The 8700K remained 14% faster at 1440p, delivering the same performance up to 4K, resulting in a very GPU-related scenario.

Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 is still very topic-based, so the 8700K has a useful advantage over the 2700X, delivering 21% more performance on average in 1080p and 1440p However, noting that Ryzen 7 did slightly better at 1% lower performance, the frame rate in 4K was roughly the same.

Cyberpunk 2077 may be a game that some would expect an 8-core/1 6 2700X to outperform or at least match the 8700K, but it wasn't because Intel is still running at 1080p. 13% performance advantage and even at 1440p the 8700K with poor performance is 1% lower.

Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order is another DirectX 11 title that fully battles 2700X and delivers over 80 frames per second in 1080p and 1440p. The performance of the 8700K at this resolution is closely related to the processor, but the frame rate increases by just over 20%, which makes a huge difference for those with higher refresh rate monitors.

The Core i7-8700K was noticeably faster at Death Stranding and about 12% higher performance at 1080p and 1440p, but with 2700X at both resolutions over 144fps, there's no margin that you will see in this address. The 2700X, along with the 8700K, looked much better than the new 11700K and 5800X.

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is a CPU intensive title, especially the in-game village we're using for testing. Despite the heavy use of CPUs, the hexa-core 8700K was much faster with an average speed of 132fps and was 23% faster than the 2700X. We saw a similar margin at 1440p, and performance returned to normal until we hit 4K.

Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege is a game where those who are serious about playing like a lot of tires, like a lot of tires. As mentioned earlier, the 2700X was good for over 300 fps on average and 1% low at nearly 300 fps, even for the hardest gamers naturally. It averaged 13% faster, with the 2700X delivering 5% more frame performance. The 8700K was more powerful at 1440p but here we're only talking about the 7% margin, so it's pretty much the same in RSS.

The performance in Thunder Wars was particularly poor for the 2700X compared to the new AMD and Intel 8-core processors, but it shouldn't be said that the experience was bad, quite the contrary, gaming at 112 FPS was smooth and fun in seconds, and was only 40% slower than the 5800X. However, compared to the 8700K, the older parts of the Ryzen 7 look better, being only 11% slower here. This margin was noted in all three resolutions tested because the 2700X and 8700K were the main performance-limiting components in this experiment.

World War Z is the only game out of 30 in which the 2700X tested was faster than the 8700K, albeit with a small difference of 5%. Honestly, this means that both processors offer similar performance.

Performance Summary

We've only covered the twelve games we tested, now it's time to compare the processors in all 30 games with 1080p data. For games with a limited CPU, it's clear that by 2021 the Core i7-8700K will still be faster than the 2700X, with an average performance of 12% more.

Here is one title where the 2700X is ahead and the margin is relatively small. On this note, we saw 8 out of 30 games with a margin of 5% or less in both directions, which we believe is a tie. Then there were 14 games where 8700K were faster by 15% or more by a huge margin.

Interestingly, if we take a quick look at the benchmark data of 35 games from 2018, we see that with the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, the 8700K at 1080p was 9% faster at 720p, it was 13 percent faster %. These margins are similar to what we found here, about three years later.

Going back to the 2021 standards, at 1440p the margin drops to 7% in favor of 8,700K and we're now reviewing 15 games, so half the games tested, 5% of them or less.

There are a half-dozen other games we're looking at with single margins and three games where the Core i7 was significantly faster by 20% or more.

4K full screen performance is very similar. Here the 8700K was 1% faster on average thanks to some good wins in War Thunder and Dirt 5. But overall, we're pretty much 4K GPUs even with the 6900 XT, so CPU performance is irrelevant.

What We Learned

This is how the Core i7-8700K will perform in 2021 and compare it to its old foe, the Ryzen 7 2700X. Intel's old 6-core/12-core CPU still delivers unparalleled gaming performance in 2021, and if you're primarily focused on gaming, I think anyone who uses it will be very happy with the way it works.


You could argue that the Ryzen 7 2700X wasn't an investment in terms of high-end gamers likely looking to upgrade to the 5800X or 5900X, and while you can keep the high-end X470, none of them offer an acceptable version of the motherboard.

After 2018, the 2700X became a much more attractive option thanks to massive discounts that led to it selling for $160 sometime in 2020—honestly, it was a great buy. - While 8700K was still in MSRP due to 14nm supply issues. Ryzen 7 vs Core i7 review: 2700X vs. 8700K

Ryzen 7 vs Core i7: 2700X vs 8700K review