Razer Blade 14 review: A gaming laptop in style

Shopping Shortcuts

Razer has been a leader in laptop design with its sleek blade hardware for many years. The Razer Blade 14 is the company's first 14-inch laptop and the first Blade to use an AMD processor. Ryzen's CPU usage should come as no surprise these days, but it's well overdue. This blade locks and loads the Ryzen 9 5900HX, one of the best laptop processors.

Our review unit paired the 5900HX with GeForce RTX 3060 graphics and a 1080p display with a 144Hz refresh rate. It costs you $1,799 and is the most cost-effective of the three new blades. It keeps the mid-range 5900HX and upgrades to the RTX 3070, 165Hz 1440p display for $2199. While the most expensive model has the RTX 3080 and costs $2,799. Razer Blade 14 review: gaming laptop

The blade looks more like a black MacBook than a gaming laptop. There are only RGB LEDs under the keyboard and the only logo is Razer Designs with backlit on the door.

The Razer looks great — and, as always, well designed. There is almost no movement on the metal base and the screen has little flexibility and no distortion on the desktop. It's sturdy enough and easily fits in a bag, although you'll need a wrap to prevent scratches on the outside. Razer Blade 14 review: gaming laptop

Depending on the hardware available, these numbers are pretty impressive. Don't make it the thinnest or lightest 14" gaming laptop you can buy right now. The Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 is wider and deeper than the Razer, but it weighs a little less and the power adapter only adds another pound. These numbers are by no means negotiable, especially for lightweight laptops. The right edge of the Razer has two USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A and Type-C ports. Both have 10Gbps bandwidth, and the latter provides DisplayPort 1.4 power and compatibility. There's also an HDMI 2.1 port here that supports 8K/120Hz output - a handy solution for the future, even if mid-range games and low-demand sports titles are only run at this resolution with the RTX 3060.

The left edge has a USB-type configuration. A and Type C along with an audio jack and power connector.

src =

Inside, there's 802.11ax Wi-Fi 6E, dual-band Bluetooth 5.2, Razer feature with Kensington lock slot, TPM 2.0 security and 720p Windows Hello webcam Camera quality isn't great, but it's great for video calls, and logging in with your face is a good result.

This is a whole bunch of features, but there are some. No Gigabit Ethernet, no card reader or fingerprint. And since this is AMD laptop, no Thunderbolt.Main memory also not expandable.

Zephyrus G14 isn't a good competitor in terms of connectivity.One USB-C port only has DisplayPort and Power Transfer, and HDMI 2.0b Its not as capable as an HDMI 2.1 Blade connection.The USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A ports have half the bandwidth of the Blade ports.Asus has a fingerprint reader, but no webcam.And although it has Wi-Fi 6 mz Doge range, however, does not have a future-proven 6E capability. Razer Blade 14 review: gaming laptop

However, there are plenty of pixels here for gaming, and the rest of the specs are good: AMD FreeSync boosts the refresh rate to 144Hz, so you can easily run the game in basic conditions, and the panel has a matte finish.

The backlight reaches a maximum of 323 cd/m², which is bright enough to handle all indoor conditions and most outdoor scenarios. The 0.17cd/m2 black point is also good: better than many other IPS screens and small enough to give the thickness the depth and brilliance - the dark colors are absorbed on this screen. The contrast ratio of 1,900:1 is impressive and better than most IPS screens. The wide contrast helps the panel deliver vibrant colors - combine it with a black point, and you've got a screen that shows games boldly and massively. Razer Blade 14 review: Lightweight gaming laptop < /p>

Colors are also appropriate. Delta E 1.66 guarantees accuracy and a very good 2.09 gamma level. The screen's color temperature of 7,348K is a bit on the cool side and far from the ideal 6500K. But this is not a disaster - it destroys the huge contrast of colors. Razer's panel offers 93.2% of the sRGB color spectrum by 96.4% by volume, so you get nearly all the original, modern shades you need. games. That's a good result - and overall, this is a great monitor - but this particular board can't handle a wide range of Adobe RGB or DCI-P3. The 1,560 and 1,440 screen is noticeably better on the expensive Blade 14 models. We've also tested that panel and can see that in addition to the higher resolution, the refresh rate is 165.Hz faster. It provides a higher sRGB gamut, so colors appear more vivid. The 1440p screen's contrast ratio of 1.072:1 is good, albeit not as big as a 1080p screen, so this is an area where the 1080p panel is deeper - but the 1440p panel isn't far in that area, making for a poor experience aided by the slower resolution, readability and ability Colors on return some value.

The speakers are reasonable but not great. They have amazing bass and enough volume to fill a bedroom, and the bass is good - but the midrange is muddy. Blade's audio suite can handle regular games and media, but the headset offers a much better experience. The Razer keyboard has an adjustable per-key RGB LED backlight, clear and bold. The keyboard has n round keys and the buttons themselves are clear, fast and integrated, so you won't have a problem with high-speed games. Razer Blade 14 review: A Gaming Laptop

On a small laptop like this there are inevitable problems. , Although the. While the buttons are quick and crisp, they aren't superficial, so they lack the heft and weight that enthusiast gamers often prefer. This type unit is suitable for casual and casual games, but you will undoubtedly find larger and heavier keys in larger laptops. Although the buttons are a little softer. Asus has traveled a little further,

there are compromises. The cursor keys are small, the carriage return is one height, and there are no number pads. The screen is fairly large and responsive, suitable for productivity and casual gaming, but a USB mouse is always better for gaming.

As usual, the Razer Synapse app manages this device. It has modules for customizing brightness and syncing it with other Razer hardware, and the laptop can be easily switched between Balanced modes and Performance Enhanced.


An in-code RTX 3060 GPU typically has 3,840 stream processors and 6GB of memory, and operates with a TDP between 90 and 100W. This is in the highest range for this core, which means a base speed of 900MHz at the base level and a more dramatic speed increase of 1,425MHz. On paper, this core is more powerful than the RTX 3060 inside Asus, which runs between 60W and 80W. The Ryzen 9 5900HX is great on paper, with eight multi-core cores along with the base and a boost of 3.3GHz and 4.6GHz — and Zen 3 architecture. The rest of the specs are good but not surprising: the Blade has 16GB of dual channel DDR4 memory with a frequency of 16GB. The 3200MHz and 1TB SSD is Samsung PM981a, which offers read and write speeds of 3,544MB/s and 2,747MB/s. . Razer Blade 14 review: Lightweight gaming laptop < /p>

The Razer RTX 3060 was a solid gamer. Two of the toughest games in our series are Red Dead Redemption 2 and Assassin's Creed Valhalla, and Blade has done really well in those titles. We ran Red Dead 2 on the high setting, Razer delivered minimum and average frame rates of 35.7 fps and 64.8 fps, and on Valhalla's very high setting, the code ran at 39.4 fps and 55.3 fps. It's fast enough to enable smooth single-player gameplay in the toughest titles.

Blade did well in other games as well. It was compressed with Shadow of the Tomb Raider's high settings of 52.4 fps and 92.9 fps, averaging 58.4 fps with the maximum game settings. At least in Far Cry: New Dawn at high settings it went over 60 fps, in Ultra it hit 54.1 fps, and in Borderlands 3 it performed well at 69.1 fps.

There is enough power here to play any of the best games today. Hassle-free titles - no more than 60fps at 1080p. And in Rainbow Six Siege, Razer ran at 191.2 fps and 182.6 fps on medium and ultra settings, so it easily plays esports games at the speed required for a 144Hz screen display.

It works well, and the higher-powered RTX 3060 will likely outperform the same chip within Asus. Not necessarily the fastest RTX 3060 we've seen. In an in-depth GPU review, we looked at chip versions that run between 80W and 95W alongside the Intel Core i7-10875H and between 115W and 130W alongside the AMD Ryzen 7 5800H. By most of our benchmarks, the other RTX 3060s were faster than the Blade, and wider swaths were noted in our lower frame rate test.

New Dawn 1080p ultra 54.1/77.2 GTA V 1080p max 4xMSAA 65.2/97.4 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p High SMAATx2 52.4/92.9 Red Dead 2 1080p High, Without AA, AF16x 35.7/64.8 Valhalla 1080p Ultra High 39.4 / 55.3 Borderlands 3 1080p Ultra, DX11, fog / ssr Medium 49.4 / 69.1

1080p Ultra settings (min / avg FPS) Graphics Settings Far Cry New Dawn 54/77 fps Ultra preset GTA V 65 97 fps maximum default, 4xMSAA Shadow of the Tomb Raider 52/92 fps preset, SMAATx2 Red Dead Redemption 2 64.35 fps, no AA, AF16x Assassin's Creed Valhalla 39/55 fps Borderlands very high 3 49/69 fps Ultra, DX11, average fog / ssr

Other devices run faster, but that's not the difference between games. A closer look at the GPU reveals that it typically runs at a maximum of 90 watts, and only 100 watts when the amplifier options are enabled. And while it boosts the Blade's performance by just a handful of frames, especially in lower frame rate tests, it still couldn't help the laptop rebuild the RTX 3060 cores we've seen elsewhere.

The processor is impressive, although this is another area where silicon is not reaching its full potential. On the Cinebench R20, the Ryzen 9 5900HX returned single-threaded 560 and 4240 scores. The former score is about 20 points behind the performance we saw in our in-depth review of the CPU, while the latter is about 700 points behind. In single-thread testing, the 5900HX is on par with the Ryzen 7 5800H, behind the newer Intel Core i7-11800H. On a multidisciplinary level, it is at the Intel level and is slower than the Ryzen 7 processor.

This model can be viewed elsewhere. The 5900HX took ten minutes and ten seconds to complete our mixer test—behind the Ryzen 7 and Ryzen 9 chips tested elsewhere, just before the Core i7. A score of 1.55 in the Matlab R2020 test is slower than any of the other processors listed here, lagging behind other CPUs in the Excel and PCMark 10 tests.

As with the graphics core, CPU Blade offers a boosted mode for faster deployment And more performance: The multi-threaded Cinebench R20's output increased to 4720, and the mixer's output improved by 1 minute. This helps, but it's not a full booster — Cinebench's revised multi-threaded score has passed the Ryzen 7 and Core i7 chips, but it still can't match the best speed we've seen since the 5900HX, and that's it. Mixer test has been increased. border="0" src="" alt=" Razer Blade 14 review: Lightweight gaming laptop">

As it stands Always, a clock speed test shows what's going on. On paper, the Ryzen 9 5900HX can boost single-core speeds of 4.6GHz and 4.2GHz. But in normal operation, Razer can only manage single and full core speeds of 4.5 GHz and 3.5 GHz. Using the boost option, the single-core speed remained at 4.5GHz, which increased the multi-core speed to 3.9GHz, but that specific 5900HX is still a bit behind. CPU and GPU compatibility on a thin and lightweight machine isn't surprising, but it does affect how you use your code in everyday life, and you'll have better performance if you let go. If you want to use a 14-inch Razer, you can pay more for the RTX 3070 or RTX 3080 versions, but they will have similar problems: These GPUs are faster, but both are limited to 100 watts. Likewise, the 5900HX only achieves its potential in a larger laptop, which has its own makeover. It still saves a lot of computing power: thin code is fast enough for original image editing and other content creation tasks, plus the office apps and browser tabs you want, decide. He. She.

And while the Razer is built this way due to its slim and lightweight chassis, the blade isn't a great heater. Let's cover the good stuff first. If you use Blade to manage tasks using normal mode of operation, you will have a great time. In single and multi-threaded tests, the CPU never went above 82°C and its exterior cooled easily. In these experiments, the noise output peaked at 45 dB and 48 dB: not slow, but not terribly loud. The noise is easily controlled by a headphone or speakers, and it's not loud enough to be annoying.

If you use the CPU performance boost mode in single-threaded situations, there is no difference in noise and heat, but using these settings in a multi-core test, the CPU temperature can reach 100 degrees. Noise levels increased to 55 dB. Razer Blade 14 review: A Gaming Laptop

The razor is also a mixed bag when playing. In normal operation, the temperature of the GPU is good at 69 ° C and the noise level is between 53 dB and 56 dB. This noise level is not disastrous and you can eliminate it with headphones or headphones, but it is not the quietest device when gaming. This isn't the coolest laptop: the bottom was a little uncomfortable and the metal on top of the keyboard was even hotter. When playing in turbo mode, the noise level was the same, but the outside was much warmer. If you want to play with this device, we recommend using a table, not around your feet.

The Blade has a 61.1Wh battery, which is only superior in certain circumstances. In game testing, it only lasted an hour and a half, which is only average: The Asus G14 lasted two hours last year, and the latest model will likely have the same life span. If you want to play with the Blade 14, it's best to plug in the power supply - and given the heat outside, it's best to put it on your desk.

By daily standards, the Blade 14 lasted 7 hours 36 minutes and the water ran out after 10 hours 17 minutes. By halving the screen brightness in both experiments, the results increased by about an hour. Blade may not run for long away from the main network, but it can take a full day from Office applications and web browsers, especially if you care about the backlight.

Who is this for? The Razer Blade 14 is a bit of an experiment, but there's a lot to love. An AMD processor is fast for nearly all of your major content production tasks, and its 14-inch chassis is sleek, powerful, thin, and light — and has a solid connection.

The RTX 3060 is fast enough to handle original single-player and esports games, and the Blade delivers long battery life when running non-gaming workloads. The screen is vibrant and has plenty of style and depth, the keyboard is immaculate, and the speakers are reasonable. Razer Blade 14 review: gaming laptop

The slim and light design means that the graphics card and processor are not reaching their full potential. The blade is sometimes hot and long. The game's battery life is the next clue, and its compact shape means compromising the keyboard layout.

Blade 14 is also as expensive as expected. The Razer-based RTX 3060 is $1,799, but you can buy an Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 with a nearly identical processor and graphics core for around $1,549. And if you don't need a 14-inch screen, larger 15.6-inch and 17.3-inch laptops with faster GPUs often cost less. The Razer Blade 14 isn't perfect, but it offers plenty of gaming power and ease of use in a small, elegant, high-quality build. If you're a fan of Razer's sleek design and want a gaming laptop, it's definitely worth buying.

Razer Blade 14 on Amazon, Laptops GeForce RTX 3060 on Amazon Ryzen 9 5900HX Laptops on Amazon

Razer Blade 14 review: A gaming laptop in style