Radeon RX 6600 XT vs. GeForce RTX 3060: Tested in 30 Games

Shopping Shortcuts:

Today we are comparing the new Radeon RX 6600 XT with the GeForce RTX 3060 in 30 games. This gives us a good idea to compare the two GPUs and also gives us another chance to re-examine the 6600 XT using real retail prices, which is great considering our first day review based on assumptions. The 6600 XT was built a week before its release, so its price and availability were largely unknown.

Speaking to retailers, it seemed like the offer would be better. Based on the markup we saw for the 6700 XT on eBay, we expected the 6600 XT to be priced around $570, and three weeks later, the actual figure is closer to $605. At the time, the average selling price for the RTX 3060 was $720, and it hasn't changed. So the Radeon RX 6600 XT is slightly worse than what we expected prior to release, but it's still better than the RTX 3060, at least based on the 12 game sample used in our first day review. Radeon RX 6600 XT vs. GeForce RTX 3060: Tested in 30 games Radeon RX 6600 XT vs. GeForce RTX 3060: Tested in 30 games Beginning with Borderlands 3, we have a rare example of Unreal Engine 4 running well on Radeon GPUs. Here, the 6600 XT was 28% faster at 1080p, delivering an average of 92fps at Ultra settings, which is actually the second highest quality in the game. The 6600 XT also did well at an average of 65 fps at 1440p, which means it's still 27% faster than the RTX 3060, so it's an easy win here for AMD.


The 6600 XT jumps back when tested with Death Stranding, although it should be noted that both GPUs performed excellent using the highest pre-set quality in gaming displays.Though the Radeon was 20 percent faster at 1080p The RTX 3060, however, still did well at an average of 132 fps. The margin fell slightly at 1440p to 18% in favor of the 6600XT, but the GeForce GPU still did well at an average of about 100 fps.

The 6600 XT beats the Forza Horizon 4, delivering 17% better performance at 1080p at 180fps. Margin decreased slightly at 1440px.

F1 2021 is the latest title to be added to a huge list of games we're measuring, and that's radiation tracing. Enables default on supported devices when Use Ultra Quality presets. In this case, we enabled them. The 6600 XT performs surprisingly well compared to the RTX 3060 because both GPUs have similar performance in all three resolutions tested.

< img alt = "" src = "picsbody / 2109/10159-9.jpg" alt=" Radeon RX 6600 XT vs. GeForce RTX 3060: Tested at 30 game "class="b-lazy">

Requires Metro Exodus Enhanced has hardware support for ray tracing and without it you have to run the original version of the game, which is not explicitly important, but because both of these GPUs support ray tracing, so it makes sense to compare with the "enhanced" version. Again, performance is about the same across all three resolutions tested, the RTX 3060 was only 4% faster at 1080p when we saw similar performance at 1440p.

Our next step is Red Dead Redemption 2. We are using "high" quality settings that must be set manually because this game has a terminal that it is not a preset which is very annoying. However, at 1080p, the 6600 XT was 9 percent faster than the RTX 3060, so there's a bit of a win, but at 1440p the performance is pretty much the same, then at 4K it's exactly the same.

CS:GO is currently the processor standard, with half of each GPU performing a test tightly connected to the CPU, but it is always in high demand. We feel compelled to get into it, and don't when there are too many other games to balance the scores. As expected, we experience similar performance between the two GPUs at the three resolutions tested.

Performance in Apex Legends is very competitive, but the CPU title is limited, at least with these GPUs not using the maximum game quality settings. Both GPUs allow 144Hz playback at 1080p, and even at 1440p you still experience high refresh rates.

game in Outriders, which we pay close attention to, has similar performance by reusing both GPUs. The RX 6600 XT was faster at 1080p, while we're looking for the same performance at 1440p.

Using the updated Cyberpunk 2077 Standard Passport, results very close to this title are demanding. Please note that radiation tracing is not enabled nor do we use the highest quality preset, instead we are content with the second best option.

Performance Summary

In our first review of the new AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT GPU, it was 10% faster than the RTX 3060 at 1080p and only 5% faster at 1440p. So it will be interesting to see these spreads compare to 30 games, so let's find out...


At 1080p we see the margin reduced from 10 in favor of the Radeon GPU to 6, which isn't a huge change, but it certainly isn't good for AMD.The drop is mainly due to the inclusion of titles like PUBG, Days Gone, Flight Simulator 2020, Warhammer II, Biomutant, and F1 2021.


Then at 1440p the margins are narrower, from 5% in the original 6600 XT review to 3% in 30 game samples, which is basically a tie. The 6600 XT saw its best results in Valorant, Borderlands 3 and War World Z, Death Stranding, and Assassin's Creed Valhalla.

What We've Learned

In general, the docking GPU is The Radeon RX 6600 XT died faster than we already knew. From previous experiences, however, the margin is narrower than previously thought. The delta between two GPUs always depends on the games used for testing - or in your case, the games you really care about. Ray-tracing performance shows up even in the few titles we tested, although we'd say the RTX 3060 currently has better overall support. The GeForce RTX 3060 also has DLSS support, which is much broader. Compared to FSR, and in our opinion it performs better at lower resolutions like 1080p. Radeon RX 6600 XT vs. GeForce RTX 3060: Tested in 30 games Radeon RX 6600 XT vs. GeForce RTX 3060: Tested in 30 games


In terms of price and availability, this is where the Radeon RX 6600 XT seems to have the biggest advantage. To show it better, here are some tire diagrams costs.

Prices fluctuate a lot depending on where you live. In Australia, the situation is pretty dire, the 6600 XT can be bought for AU$730 when viewing current models, while the RTX 3060 costs $1100, which is 51 premium for a GeForce GPU. In terms of cost per frame, the RTX 3060 is 61% more expensive than the 6600 XT in this market at 1080p and 54% more per frame at 1440p. Radeon RX 6600 XT vs. GeForce RTX 3060: Tested in 30 games


In the United States, the situation is much less radical. Looking at the eBay listing, the RTX 3060 is 19% more expensive. This means that the RTX 3060 is 27% more expensive per frame than the Radeon at 1080p and 22% more at 1440p. Even in Newegg, the RTX 3060 gives you 28% more per frame, and with the 6600 XT it uses an MSI B550 Tomahawk motherboard, so it makes more sense for US buyers to make this deal rather than buying. on ebay. Radeon RX 6600 XT vs. GeForce RTX 3060: Tested in 30 Games

This situation for Nvidia GPUs is unlikely to change soon, as the company has announced that it expects supply issues for the RTX 3060 series. It runs through September, so it's unclear if the supply will improve before the end of the year. 2021. Mining has driven up GPU prices, but we still control pricing and availability through monthly updates. Radeon RX 6600 XT on Amazon Radeon RX 6800 on Amazon GeForce RTX 3060 on Amazon GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on Amazon GeForce RTX 3080 on Amazon Rizen 9 5900X on Amazon Rizen 5 5600X on Amazon

Radeon RX 6600 XT vs. GeForce RTX 3060: Tested in 30 Games