A few months ago, the RTX 3050 Ti was announced alongside the RTX 3050 for laptops, but with the limited supply available, it surprised us a bit. Longer to have samples on hand.
At the moment, the prices of the laptops seem to be very different.Nvidia initially considered the RTX 3060 to be a $1,000 laptop, and the RTX 3050 a $800, And possibly the RTX 3050 Ti.
This matches the base price of previous generations of GTX 1660 Ti systems.. Although those pricing targets are a bit optimistic, the more realistic configuration of the 3050 Ti is above $1,000, Although it's still $100 to $200 less than a similar RTX 3060 model inside.Generation comparisons are a little tricky now, but this should be an accurate Nvidia site guide for this GPU.
< img border = "0" alt = "src =" picsbody / 2107 / 9132-2.jpg "alt =" https://safirsoft.com Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti: 4GB VRAM review returns "class=" b- lazy ">
GPX RTX 3050 Ti based on silicon The new GA107, which has not yet reached the desktop market. But as usual, when the RTX 3050 Ti runs on a desktop, it works differently than the laptop of the same name.
Specifications include 20 SM for a total of 2,560 CUDA cores and 20 RT cores. and 80 tensor cores. The clock speed increases to 1695MHz at 80W, or up to 1035MHz for a 35W configuration, giving us a very wide range of power from 35 to 80W.
Also 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on 128 dual-bit buses at 12 GB/s. The 3050 Ti is basically two-thirds the size of the RTX 3060 in SM capacity and VRAM.
Nvidia is also trying to make both regular gaming laptops and ultraportable systems, with the large RTX 3050 Ti powerband built into the 35W model, formerly known as the "Max" -Q".
This makes it very important to check the power specifications of each laptop. You're shopping, because 80W models aren't as close in performance as 35W models, and unfortunately Nvidia uses both names. Today's test system is XMG Core 17, a 17-inch gaming laptop focused on performance and performance.
I was positively impressed with what I experienced with the XMG it used to deliver cooling and quality Construction and hardware in general. Core 17 is no exception and is a minimalist design built for value. If you're interested in this particular XMG model, check it out here, but the results of this review should apply to many RTX 3050 Ti laptops. Inside, there is a Core i7-11800H processor and 16 GB of dual storage. The DDR4-3200 channel is a good hardware choice and does not interfere with performance. There's also a 1080p, 144Hz IPS display and a 1TB SSD. The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti is powered by 80-95W dynamics with dynamic boost, so we're looking for the highest power configuration that Nvidia has to offer for this. Adjustable BAR is also supported.
The focus of this review will be on testing 1080p with Optimus enabled, which is the default configuration for most laptops that use GPUs. The output is routed to the monitor via the iGPU. We also tested at 1440p using an external monitor that connects directly to the GPU, giving us a minimal experience and at a higher resolution.Go to the graphs...Benchmarks
Looking at the Metro Exodus, we'll do the Ultra settings at 1080p Here, the RTX 3050 Ti runs at roughly the same frame rate as the RTX 2060, which puts it slightly ahead of the GTX 1660 Ti, all with the same power limitations.
The position is similar at 1440 pixels. Although the RTX 3050 Ti can't power on easily, especially if you lower the quality settings from Ultra to High, this GPU is still 25% slower than the RTX 3060 compared to the 80W vs 80W settings.
Tested in Borderlands 3 using 1080p with great settings, the RTX 3050 Ti is faster than the 90W RTX 2060 and is actually 7% faster, although this reduces the deficit to 7% compared to the 115W RTX 2060. However, we're looking forward to 11 percent faster performance than the alternative graphics processor, the GTX 1660 Ti, and 14% worse performance than the 80W RTX 3060.
< p> At 1440p, you can see the RTX 3050 Ti again, which is a class behind the RTX 3060. iots In this particular game, the higher power of the RTX 3060 at 115W is 40% faster than the RTX 3050 Ti, which is a huge performance boost, Although a high-end GPU has 50% more CUDA cores with higher power limits.
In red Dead Redemption 2, the RTX 3050 Ti once again configures the RTX 2060 90W at 1080p using high settings. That's slightly faster than the GTX 1660 Ti, about 6% faster at this address. While this quality can be played back somewhat in 1080p, the ground is clearly lower than the RTX 3060, which delivers 31% higher frame rates even on the low-power 80-95W model.
Then at 1440p the RTX 3050 Ti tries. It actually rivals the RTX 3060 80W, but is well behind the higher power type, which can deliver a 60fps experience at this resolution and quality setting.
Rainbow Six Siege with 1080p mid-range performance gives us a good look at how to limit your GPU and I would normally be in competitive shooter games. The 3050 Ti is powerful enough that it's not far from processor-limited laptops with more powerful hardware, but the GPU is also a bit limited, delivering 220 fps versus +260 fps. We know this processor can handle it . While this is a very good performance for a laptop, the 3050 Ti is more than enough for this game.
Assassin's Creed Valhalla with the RTX 3050 Ti's ultra-high 1080p settings is a disaster. These settings have severe VRAM limitations for a 4GB card like the 3050 Ti, even the larger 6GB GTX 1060 offers better performance due to the extra 2GB of VRAM.
This indicates that Nvidia is on the decline. The VRAM capacity in this price range previously offered the GTX 1660 Ti 6GB, but reducing it to 4GB isn't enough for some modern games like this one. Of course, the problem is no better at 1440p resolution, with higher resolutions making VRAM capacity more complex.
Cyberpunk 2077 is generally not playable on an RTX 3050 Ti using Ultra 1080p settings, which is already too much for a GPU. Therefore, I highly recommend limiting the medium settings. VRAM plays a role in the performance gap between this GPU and the RTX 2060, but that's not the same disaster we saw in Assassin's Creed. The RTX 3060 is a much better option for this game and combines the settings, at least 35% more performance at the same power level.
With 1440p at this address, performance drops one percent more, 9 frames per second. This again is because there is only 4GB of VRAM, these settings are on the edge of 1080p and maybe some performance limits, then you go to 1440p and that's way too much. This also causes issues with radiation tracing, as this feature increases VRAM allocation, which in games I've tried like Cyberpunk tends to experience severely damaged radiation tracing even with DLSS enabled (you're seeing lower-level medium or low (RT) settings).
At Horizon Zero Dawn, using maximum 1080p settings, the RTX 3050 Ti is slightly faster than the RTX 2060 90W, delivering a 60fps experience on a native laptop screen.However, performance is 18% behind on the highest power configuration of the RTX 3060.
At 1440p the game is still using the highest visibility settings, which is great to see, although you should be lower than 60fps and make sure you're not using Optimus.
< img src = "picsbody / 2107 / 9132 -19.jpg" alt = "https://safirsoft.com Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti: 4GB VRAM review follow up">
The last game we're looking at in detail is Dirt 5. In this title at 1080p with Ultra Preset, I was able to get the same performance between RTX 3050 Ti and RTX 2060 with 90W, not bad.Performance on the end is 15% slower than RTX 3060 80W and 26% slower on higher power configuration.
Meanwhile with 1440p, it can withstand 3050 Ti to some extent, although you can expect to experience 40fps, so you might want to pick l to lower quality settings. Performance comparison
Looking at some direct comparisons in the larger set of games we tested overall, the bottom line is that the RTX 3050 Ti is quite similar to the RTX 2060 in a similar power configuration.
In games where VRAM or CPU isn't limited to 1080p, the 3050 Ti averages a few. However, reducing VRAM from 6GB to 4GB in titles like Assassin's Creed Valhalla, Control, and Cyberpunk 2077 is killer radiation tracing - in those games you have to skip the quality settings, since performance must be restored to RTX. Level 2060, while the RTX 2060 is not limited to this method.
Was The RTX 2060 is also available in a 115W power configuration. With a limited selection of games, the RTX 3050 Ti appears to be about 10% slower outside of the VRAM limit. This gives a valuable look at max power vs. max power, although I should note that most 2060 gaming laptops I've seen use an 80 watt or 90 watt limit, not 115 watts.
Then, while watching the 3050 Ti vs. the GTX 1660 Ti, the 1660 Ti was already in such a weird state that in many games it wasn't much slower than the RTX 2060 at the same kind of power. When comparing 80W versus 80W, the 3050 Ti was 7% faster in a limited set of 1080p games and achieved the best results in the +10% range. Again, though, the VRAM limit is something to consider, as the 3050 Ti has 4GB versus the 1660 Ti 6GB.
3050 Ti is also not good for modern GPUs. At 1080p, this mainstream GPU is on average 21% slower than the RTX 3060, which is configured within the same allowable range. This should give you an idea of the difference in performance between GPUs in a similar 80W laptop chassis, which should come in handy since many laptops have options for each GPU. This includes some limited VRAM results, without reducing the margin to around 15%.
However, the margin is growing at 1440p, because again VRAM is a more important factor in this resolution. While the RTX 3060 is capable of 1440p, I don't feel the RTX 3050 Ti is good enough, and I generally want to stick with the 1080p display options this GPU was built for.
Comparing peak power and peak power is a slaughter for the RTX 3050 Ti, as the RTX 3060 is much faster with a maximum gain of 115 watts. The 1080p graph shows that the RTX 3050 TI is 28% slower on average, despite having many parts in it. At 1440p, this situation gets even worse, with the highest power configuration the RTX 3060 performing 50% better outside of limited VRAM addresses, or the RTX 3050 Ti 32% slower. This corresponds to the difference in specifications.What we learned
A good start, the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti has the same functionality as the old RTX 2060, configured at the same power level. Nvidia continues this trend of better performance in the new generation, which usually equates to a higher category than the previous generation. Comparing current markets to previous years is difficult, but the RTX 3050 Ti laptops should be cheaper than the launch price of the RTX 2060 laptops. The 3050 Ti also offers mid-range performance compared to the GTX 1660 Ti. It should be the same price category. At about 10% speed, the GTX 1660 Ti card does not need to be purchased at a discount, although the RTX 3050 Ti supports radiation tracing and DLSS, while the GTX 1660 Ti does not.
New laptops should also have faster processors that have been much improved over the past few years. While this has nothing to do with the RTX 3050 Ti GPU, this is a point worth noting when focusing on certain laptop models.
On the underside of the stars, using just 4GB of VRAM isn't enough for the level of performance offered by a GPU. . Similar performance to the RTX 2060 means the 3050 Ti has no problem with 1080p games at Ultra settings, and in most cases this is true - unless the texture is larger than the VRAM cache, which ranges from 6GB to 4GB GDDR6 compared to the 2060's Some games that aren't even enough in 1080p, let alone in the future use almost more VRAM.
Now, there is a place in the market for 4GB VRAM cards, and entry level options like the GTX 1650 make sense, because you'll often be playing with average settings because the GPU is generally not Powerful enough for Ultra.But the RTX 3050 Ti is much faster than the GTX 1650 and opens up the game at higher settings and quality, as 4GB can narrow the card before the CUDA cores are saturated.
Reducing VRAM in this price range also hinders tracking Radiation, which tends to allocate more VRAM than traditional restore.It is a good idea to take Radiation tracing to lower categories, but when you don't have enough VRAM to handle more demand (or even simple supply for that matter) there isn't much
The RTX 3050 Ti also faces stiff competition from Nvidia. The RTX 3060 is much faster and delivers 35% more performance at the same 80W or 50% more if the RTX 3060 is configured to a maximum of 115W. This margin is well above the higher levels, with something like the RTX 3070 only 20% ahead of the 3060.
With the RTX 3060, which typically costs $100-200 more on an RTX equivalent laptop. With the advent of VRAM and the huge jump in performance, the 3060 is a much better deal for gamers. Be strict enough and you can find mid-range and mid-range gaming laptops with this GPU without overpricing.
This is the main incentive for those hoping to get a great value worth buying today. Market. For low-end laptops, the RTX 3050 Ti is still a solid GPU, but that's not a big point some were hoping for. GeForce RTX 3050 Ti laptops on Amazon GeForce RTX 3060 laptops on Amazon GeForce RTX 3070 laptops on Amazon Core i7 Tiger Lake laptops on Amazon Ryzen 7 5800H laptops on Amazon
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti: 4GB VRAM review goes back