Intel Core i9 11980HK review: The fastest Tiger Lake processor

Shopping Shortcuts

Today we're taking a look at the Core i9-11980HK, Intel's fastest processor in the Tiger Lake H45 series. A few weeks ago we tested the new Core i7-11800H, which impressed with the increased performance compared to previous Intel components, but ended up with different feelings.

The i7-11800H can't beat AMD. The Ryzen 5000 equivalent in most productivity applications, and a higher overall price tag than the Intel platform, undermines its advantage in games that run well on Intel.

The Core i9-11980HK is the top processor in the Intel family of mobile devices. , so we want to know that its performance is comparable to the Ryzen 9 or Intel Core i7-11800H mobile chip, which are more common and usually found in the same systems. How much did Intel get their best octa-core Tiger Lake silicon?

src =

In this review, special attention has been paid to this comparison of 11980HK and 11800H. Both processors are very close in terms of basic design and specifications. Both are 8-core 8 chipsets -core with 24MB of L3 cache.Both have integrated Intel Xe graphics.The main difference lies in clock speed: 11800H base frequency is 2.3GHz and max turbo clock is 4.6GHz, 11980HK has base 2.6GHz and max turbo clock is 5.0 GHz, provided that the CPU cooling is sufficient.This gives the Core i9 a clock speed of about 10%.

Another advantage of the 11980HK is the platform aspect.Although most of the specifications are the same on the Tiger Lake H45 processors. : 20 lines of PCIe 4.0 connected to the CPU, support for Thunderbolt 4, DDR4-3200, and a 10nm SuperFin processing node - but as an HK model, the 11980HK also supports Overclocking. Intel Core i9 11980HK review: Fastest Tiger Lake processor < /p> Intel Core i9 11980HK review: Fastest Tiger Lake processor

While all Intel H series processors are allowed to configure any power limit (including above the standard 45W even in locked regions), only 11980HK allows you to set the clock factor table and many other values ​​to run Intel XTU or other. Well-being services. Usually, this only applies to the most expensive laptops because power and heat restrictions are important for most designs.

Today's benchmark is the MSI GE76 Raider, a similar laptop from the same family of products we tested when testing the Core i9-10980HK.

src =

Inside is a GeForce RTX 3080 GPU with 16GB of VRAM and a power limit of 135-155W, and for our testing of 16GB of dual-channel DDR4 memory the 3200 is good quality And it's standardized and used in all the H series laptops we tested.

This is a good laptop, 17" 1440p 165Hz screen, really suitable for a GPU because this type of hardware has exceeded 1080p resolution In modern games.This isn't the thinnest and lightest model, but it isn't meant to be.This is a performance-focused laptop that's still portable, with good metallic build quality, although I can grab the RGB lighting strip or leave it on the leading edge.

src =

However this is not a laptop review, this is a review of the Core 9-11980HK, so like all previous laptop tests, this is a normal system powerhouse. I tested. This means that we keep all behavioral stocks, but use a long power limit of 45W, which is the default for these processors.

This allows us to do Apple-to-Apple comparisons on different laptops. Ignore any OEM settings or potential cooling/power differences between models. As a result, it is a real test of CPU performance compared to others, not just a test where a particular OEM can configure their system to use the most power.

src =

We'll give you some power metrics later in the review, so you can see how different chips perform at different power levels. Which can be helpful for your buying decision. Benchmarks! Benchmarks

It is the first Cinebench R23. In this workload, 11980HK has good performance and offers 7% performance compared to Core i7-11800H. This makes 11980HK more competitive with Ryzen, and matches the performance of Ryzen 7 5800H, which is 9% behind than the Ryzen 9 5900HX when displaying the same power configuration.

The margin is only a single digit. Although a significant 28% performance increase over the Core i9-10980HK over the previous generation is seen in this heavy multitasking task. However, it was a good sign of Intel's performance improvements here.

The single-threaded performance results for the Cinebench R23 are very strong for Intel, with a few caveats. 11980HK is faster than the Ryzen 9 5900HX In this test, I scored a 3% performance difference that is close to the error limit but faster. It's also slightly faster than the Core i7-11800H and 17% ahead of the 10980HK.

The gains we see here between 11980HK and 11800H show the magnitude of the difference in the nominal clock speed. With 5.0 GHz 11980HK and 4.6 GHz 11800H, the Core i9 should be around 8-9% faster, but here it's only 3% faster. why is that?

Well, that's because the 11980HK rarely runs at a maximum speed of 5.0GHz, and can do so with very short bursts, but stable performance is rarely seen at the same speed the clock sits. The single-series Cinebench R23 takes a few minutes to run, so for the most part it sits at the slower 11980HK.

In our manual brake processor encoder test, the 11980HK is slightly faster than the 11800H: exactly 4%. That's big enough to avoid a margin of error, but there's not much difference between 8-core components, and it's clearly slightly more efficient in the stable Core i9 period.

Finally, Intel is 15 percent behind the Ryzen 9 5900HX, and 15 percent ahead of its predecessor, the 10980HK.

We see similar results in the Blender Classroom workload. Here the 11980HK is 8% faster than the 11800H, but 14% slower than the Ryzen 9 5900HX. In this kind of heavy multi-threaded load that takes a few minutes to complete, the Ryzen processor has a performance advantage of 45W, and therefore it stands out for performance.

In Chromium, which is again long-lasting and multi-threaded, the 11980HK performs well: 6% faster than the 11800HK, which allows you to use the AMD 5900HX neck and sit on the neck. With a 20% increase over the 10980HK, there are many reasons to upgrade to the new model from the previous generation of Intel, and the benefit to the laptop agent is enormous.

With a larger L3 cache than its AMD counterparts, at 24MB versus 16MB, the 11980HK outperforms the 5900HX by 10%. Intel comes with excellent single-thread performance, and it performs well in this type of test.

Similar story in Microsoft Excel's Number Processing Test. That was one of the largest margins between the Core i9-11980HK and Core i7-11800H at around 19%, which appears to be a byproduct of higher clock speeds at a given power level and this MSI laptop's ability to power up.

The result is 20% higher performance than the AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX in this workload.

For daily workloads generally measured in PCMark 10 core tests, there's no difference between the Tiger Lake H45 series and AMD's Ryzen 5000 series. So if you are only interested in downloading the main program, browsing the web, video conferencing, and more, then every part of the current generation is just right for you.

We see similar results in PCMark 10 applications. Workloads on the Ryzen 9 5900HX and Core i9-11980HK are not much different, compared to what in our previous low-performance comparison experiments I've seen thread, it makes sense .

in 7-Zip compression is the clear winner for the Core i9-11980HK processor. The Core i9 outperforms the Ryzen 9 5900HX in performance by 14% - AMD's current generation components are more compatible with 10th generation Intel.

However, it flips when we look at the compression mode. Currently the 11980HK is 15% slower than the Ryzen 9 5900HX and only a few percent slower than the i7-11800H. AMD processors perform very well in compression loads and have been doing this for some time now.

In Adobe Photoshop using the Puget Systems benchmark, the Core i9-11980HK performs well, slightly better than the Ryzen 9 5900HX, although both systems offer the same level of performance.

Although 11980HK is 10% faster than 11800H and corresponds to the clock speed difference, 11980HK is not much faster than 10980HK. I think most of this is due to the amount of work that favors frequency, with the 10th Gen Core i9 having a small advantage over the 11th Gen in lower quality applications like this.

In DaVinci Resolve Studio 17, it's always difficult to compare different laptops because the GPU has a huge influence here. But what can be seen is that with the same RTX 3080 GPU, the new 11980HK performs better than 10980HK and offers 13% more points. There is a difference in the GPU, but Intel and AMD seem to be very competitive on this kind of workload in this generation.

Very similar result in Adobe Premiere Export from Puget Systems. 15% better performance compared to 11980HK with 10980HK allows Intel to perform well and compete with Ryzen 9 5900HX, and this shows the difference in GPUs, which means that we can generally only talk about performance. alt="" src="" alt=" Intel Core i9 11980H review: Fastest Tiger Lake processor" class="b-lazy">

Finally, we have Adobe After Effects. The combination of the 11980HK Laptop GPU and the RTX 3080 is very powerful for this workload and provides excellent performance, beating many other systems tested and delivering results well above the 10980HK. Power scaling data shows how the Core i9-11980HK compares to other processors with different power levels. We can only push the MSI GE76 Raider steadily down to around 75W, because the cooling solution in this machine is more focused on the GPU. However, some clear trends can be seen here...

The principle is that at a certain power level, the 11980HK is 5 to 10 percent ahead of the 11800H, with margins higher , but it's still great. The overall power scalability behavior we observed with the 11800H is still present, as it develops better at higher power levels than AMD Ryzen 8 core processors, but overall the processor is less efficient than the Ryzen 9 5900HX at TDPs. It has a lower level. In the real world, this means that laptops with larger and larger coolers have lower performance margins between the 5900HX and 11980HK, and are expected to be around 85 to 95 watts, both of which are roughly equal. However, in smaller and lighter systems, and even in standard size laptops, AMD comes first. Also, the higher the power level, the greater the distance between 11980HK and 10980HK. Game Standards

Now let's look at some of the games. Using technologies like Nvidia Optimus, we will focus on testing 1080p with a monitor connected to the integrated graphics processor. This gives us most of the CPU limitations, but is still a real use for most laptops.

In Shadow of the Tomb Raider, see a drop in performance from 11980HK to 10980HK on the same laptop with the same GPU. The new eleventh-generation model is five percent slower and has the same performance as the 11800H we previously tested with the RTX 3070 laptop GPU inside. This is a little disappointing, but not entirely surprising.

But in most cases this is not the result you see...

In Borderlands 3, the 11980HK is faster, especially at the bottom 1%, while offering The new model has 15% higher results, and is more compatible with AMD processors. The average frame rate has also increased by 4%.

In Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order, which tends to be relatively single-threaded, the 11980HK has 8% performance using the same mobile RTX 3080 GPU on average than the Go up 10980HK . This goes hand in hand with the Ryzen 9 5900HX standard where the processor is limited.

In Rainbow Six Siege, Intel processors clearly outperform AMD and deliver higher performance frame rates than the Ryzen 9 5900HX. The 11980HK is 10% faster than the 10980HK in this test when using the same GPU, which is a good result for Intel's last generation.

A lot of the time in these situations, basically the GPU on gaming laptops is limited, even when running at 1080p. Control is one example where there is no performance difference between the two configurations.

If you want to play these types of titles or play at a higher resolution like 1440p, the processor is not very important when buying in the Core i7 or Ryzen 7 classes and above.

Death Stranding Another acceptable result for the Core i9-11980HK and an increase in performance compared to the Core i9-10980HK, here we are looking at the 10% difference for margins so far I've seen on the upside.

We collect everything Standard Hitman 3 Dartmoor. I might have expected greater delta performance between the 11th and 10th gen systems in a CPU-heavy game, but the difference appears to be only 4% in favor of the new 11980HK. Compare this performance to the MSI GE76 with an RTX 3080, Core i9-11980HK, or Core i9 in modern laptop processors. Comparing the performance of the i9-10980HK, with an average resolution of 1080p, the newer 11th generation model is only 3% faster than the test model 18. Core i9-11980HK vs Core i9-10980HK

Very nice, from It is unbelievable and disappointing to see a decline in performance in so few titles. However, this is balanced by a performance increase of 7% or higher across six balance titles, so it will depend on your exact gameplay to take advantage of the increased IPC with new Tiger Lake processors or higher clock speeds. The case of previous generation models has an advantage.

However, in productive workloads, the 11980HK is much faster than the 10980HK. In multi-threaded tests, the new 11th generation model is up to 30 percent faster at 45 watts, and that number will increase at higher power levels.

Accompanying this is a 15% increase in single-thread performance, Intel's biggest jump in the H-series in some time. Core i9-11980HK vs Core i7-11800H

By contrast, the difference between the 11980HK and the multistep model below, the Core i7-11800H, is small. In multidisciplinary workloads, we've generally seen only single digit earnings, with some remote experiences pushing into the realm of double digits.

Then for single-string or string tests, there is not much difference, especially in long-string single-string tests, because 11980HK can only have 5GHz in the short term. Core i9-11980HK vs. Ryzen 9 5900HX

When it comes to comparing Intel and AMD, we have a battle between the Core i9-11980HK and the Ryzen 9 5900HX. AMD has a high-end Ryzen 9 5980HX processor, but this chip looks rare and we haven't been able to test it yet. Anyway, the results are different.

In long, multi-threaded loads, AMD has a clear advantage, lagging by up to 15% with the 11980HK. However, the 11980HK is faster on other workloads, has a slight advantage over single-threaded loads, and wins a few more in other tests like Matlab and Excel, which are cache-heavy.

Average scores for all these numbers are 11980HK and 5900HX, but it depends on the tasks you do the most on your laptop, which CPU is the more powerful option. 11980HK Chizhai Ziyadi Ra K Darbara Pardazanda Hai Tiger Lake H45 Intel Mi Danim Change Name Dhd. The speed of the clock is attributed to the Core i7, 11980HK, more than the speed of the Core i7-11800H, which is 5 to 10% AST.

Where are you? But where is the footnote of Ziad Nest, like this, in order to monitor Intel’s control over the course of the day, and to pay attention to it, or lip tabs, this is a phase that is capable of changing the direction of Dahad. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

khabar khop where is astke intel version can be directed ra his opinions m uhd prae darandgan lip tap hi nasl 10 ( ya qadimi tr ) dar karhai bahre ri. Approx. 11980HK Dur har bar curry dresd du braber fast az 10980HK stek dr singen train hi-tech program 30 dsd black with dusty me ord. .

What is the difference between the frequency and partial recurrence of Skylake? ، این یک بازسازی اساسی معماری در یک گره فرایند 10 نانومتری SuperFin جدید است که دارای مزایای فراوان در هر منطقه است.

در خارج از این موارد ، سخت است که هیجان زده شوید حدود 11980HK. تا حدی با AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX قابل رقابت است ، اما در بارهای چند رشته ای که مشخص است Zen 3 کارآیی بیشتری دارد ، ضرر می کند. اینتل هنگام مقایسه Core i9 با Ryzen 9 در رقابت از نظر رقابت پذیری بیشتر به نظر می رسد ، اما حتی در آن زمان نیز هنوز تفاوت های اساسی را در جایی که GPU اغلب نقش بسیار مهمتری دارد ، مشاهده نکردیم.

Core i9 11980HK نیز از این مشکل رنج می برد. آدمخوار شدن محصول. من فقط دلیل قانع کننده ای برای خرید یک لپ تاپ 11980HK در هنگام وجود 11800H نمی بینم و 95٪ از عملکرد آن را ارائه می دهد ، به ویژه هنگامی که Core i9 CPU معمولاً یک گزینه 300 دلار + در لپ تاپ های مشابه است.

هنگامی که لپ تاپ های Core i9 11980HK را با لپ تاپ های Ryzen 9 5900HX با پردازنده گرافیکی مشابه مقایسه می کنید ، ارزش پیشنهادی خوب نیست. به طور معمول ، پیکربندی AMD در برخی شرایط 500 دلار یا کمتر در دسترس است ، که این ارزش را در محکمه AMD در حال حاضر محکم می گذارد.

با عملکرد دو سیستم عامل در تعادل عمومی ، عملکرد مطلوب AMD و به نظر ما اختلاف قیمت قابل قبول حتی قابل توجیه نیست.

تنها نکته باقی مانده برای بحث در مورد مزیت پلتفرم اینتل است که امروزه نیز تا حدی مرتبط است. 11980HK پشتیبانی از PCIe 4.0 و Thunderbolt 4 را ارائه می دهد ، که مورد دوم ممکن است نکته اصلی فروش برخی باشد. پردازنده های اینتل همچنین در طیف گسترده ای از لپ تاپ ها و در دسترس بودن بهتر یافت می شوند.

در پایان روز ، ما در این نسل از لپ تاپ ها اکیداً توصیه می کنیم که تمرکز خود را روی پیشنهادات Core i7 یا Ryzen 7 بگذارید. عملکرد و ارزش بالاترین قیمت برای بیشتر خریداران است. لپ تاپ های Intel Core i9-11980HK در آمازون لپ تاپ های Intel Core i7-11800H در آمازون MSI GE76 Raider 11th gen on Amazon Ryzen 7 5800H لپ تاپ ها در آمازون Ryzen 9 5900HX لپ تاپ ها در آمازون لپ تاپ های GeForce RTX 3080 در آمازون لپ تاپ های GeForce RTX 3060 در آمازون

Intel Core i9 11980HK review: The fastest Tiger Lake processor