Intel Core i5-12600K review: 5600X fail

Shopping Shortcuts:

The new Core i5-12600K is the only Alder Lake CPU we haven't tested yet, a week ago we tested both the flagship 12900K and then the almost faster Core i7-12700KF (but cheaper). This newer-generation Core i5 at $320 is a direct competitor to AMD's Ryzen 5 5600X, which is currently priced at $310 or just above the $300 MSRP. AMD's hexa-core chip with 12 threads, while the 12600K consists of 6 P cores and 4 E cores for a total of 16 threads. P cores can clock in at 4.9 GHz, and E cores come close at 3.6 GHz, so the clock speed is very similar to 12,700 thousand, although the number of P cores is only 25% lower. It is still stable.

The L3 cache has also been reduced to 20MB. Other than that, the new Core i5 and Core i7 processors are very similar. Given that the 12600K is about 30% cheaper, it seems like a good deal.

There are still other specifications, so 20 PCIe lines of CPU, 16 of which are new specifications are PCI Express 5.0. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, but not simultaneously or through a single motherboard, so you have to choose the type of memory you want to use in advance. Intel Core i9 12900K Intel Core i7 12700K Intel Core i5 12600K Intel Core i9 11900K Intel Core i7 11700K MSRP $650 $450 $320 $540 $400 Release date November 2021 March 2021 Cores / threads 16/24 12/18 /2061/2061. 3.7 GHz 3.5 GHz 3.6 GHz Max Turbo 3.9 / 5.2 GHz 3.8 / 5.0 GHz 3.6 / 4.9 GHz 5.3 GHz 5.0 GHz L3 Cache 30 MB 25 MB 20 MB 1620 MB DDRR4-400 DDR5-40000 DDR5448GA S /

Memory Support Stoke includes DDR4-3200 or DDR5-4800, but we're testing a faster DDR5-6000 memory we've evaluated. Core i9-12900K with. However, we found that in most cases this high-speed memory delivers very poor performance when paired with an Alder Lake CPU. This leads us to the conclusion that most potential 12th generation customers should ignore DDR5 and use only DDR4.

Therefore, we are not going to spend time testing 12600K with DDR5 standards. If you want to see what this is all about, check out our 12900K review where we compared the two memory technologies.

For motherboards, we are using MSI Z690 Tomahawk Wi- Fi DDR4 for testing. Due to the Hybrid Alder Lake core design, the 12600K and all other 12th generation processors work best with Windows 11 and the improved thread schedule for optimal performance. So, we tested all CPUs, new and old, using the fresh install of Windows 11.

In a recent performance test of Windows 11, we also found that Ryzen for gaming typically used a slightly faster speed. He is. Up-to-date OS The Ryzen test system uses the Asus ROG Crosshair VIII Dark Hero motherboard with the latest BIOS updates, the latest Windows updates and drivers installed. Finally, all software and game data were collected using the Radeon RX 6900 XT graphics card. More performance, even to beat the 58% X. We're also looking at a 61% improvement over 11,600k, which is very significant even considering the 23% price increase.


The single-core performance was exceptional too, 5600x and beat the 11600k by 26%, which was a huge upgrade for a generation. This also means that the 12600K should easily outperform the 5600X for loads. Single core multi-core working.

src =

Due to this issue, 12600K and 5600X files are tested equally with Compress 7-zip. , although that's one of the poorest results we've seen for the 12th generation at 12700KF and 12900K, so it's no surprise.

When it comes to decompression performance, the 12600K and 5600X are the same, which means the new Core i5 processor is 23% slower than the 12700KF.

The 12600K proves to be in a completely different situation. 48% from the Ryzen 5 5600X, as it only took 86 seconds to complete rendering, which is the exact time spent on the 5800X. Like we said before, you'll really get the next level of performance with 12600K.

< p > For content creators, the 12600K provides exceptional value with nearly 40% more performance than the 5600X and even outperforms the 5800X by a 16% margin.We're talking 13% performance compared to the 12700K, which is exceptional value from the latest part of the Intel Core i5.

< p> src =

Next, we have Adobe Photoshop and here 12600K was faster than the 5600X and could match the 5800X. The Intel Core i5 chip was only 7% slower than the 12700KF chip, so the 12600K makes a good price-performance niche for Intel's 12th-generation series.


We see that the 12600K outperforms the 5600X in After Effects and delivers 17% better performance, which was enough to see the 5800X break 5%. We're reviewing 12.7 million performance levels, making 12600K one of the fastest desktop CPUs for this workload.

src =

Factorio is a simulation game that we put alongside the software we do because we don't measure Frames per second, but also refresh per second. This meter automatically calculates the time it takes to run 1,000 updates. This is a single-threaded test that seems to be highly dependent on cache capacity.

The new Core i5 is here Compared to the 5600X, the 5800X and especially its predecessor 11600K. It has a great performance. A difference of 27%. In addition, it was only 6% slower than the 12700KF.

12600K is also great for code compilation, It beats the 5600X by 57% to 19.Slower than 12700KF% more expensive.We're also looking at a 43% improvement over 11600K, so if you've bought one in the last 9 months it's too bad.

The last benchmark for software we want Look at Blender, and once again proves That 12600K is at a completely different level, beating the 5600X by 44%. Once again, the new Core i5 processor can be compared with the previous generation 5800X and 11700K.

The main problem with the best Core i9-12900K processor from Alder Lake was power consumption, which we realized. This was less worrying about the 12700K. Well, with the 12600K you don't have to worry at all because the 12600K makes 46% more overall system usage than the 5600X, but it also offers 44% more performance, so it's pretty much the same in terms of performance. It matched the 5800X's performance in this test, and we see roughly the same overall system use. So the energy efficiency of Alder Lake is better than we originally thought. Intel Core i5-12600k review: 5600X crash

When it comes to cooling, we used the Corsair iCUE H115i Elite Capellix for the temperature results, rather than the larger 360mm MSI model for the 12700K and 12900K cooling. Using this standard AIO 240mm, 12600K hit 71°C for the package and 72°C for the cores, after 30 minutes of looking at the multi-core Cinebench R23 in a closed-chamber Corsair Obsidian 500D box. A temperature of 21 degrees Celsius. Test.

This is a reasonable temperature that compares between 12600K and 11600K, or 5800C. It also means that with 240mm AIO we have overhead room for overclocking, and that's something we'll look at in the future. Game performance

Time is key to gaming benchmarks and we're starting with F1 2021. For all gaming tests we're using a Radeon RX 6900 XT with 1080p call quality settings. The 12600K energizes a 373fps average speed with a 1% drop from 260fps on the racing SIM. When compared to the 5600X, we see that the 12600K is a hybrid case that delivers 5% stronger and 1% less, with an average frame rate performance of 5% slower. In general, the performance between the two processors, with the 5800X and 12700KF, is about the same.

src =

Move to Rainbow Six Siege, 12600K Despite its acceleration to nearly 400 fps, less embarrassing. Loading at an average frame rate of 511 fps. The 5600X is 10 percent faster percent, although it is difficult to say, since all the processors tested here can significantly boost frame rate.

5600X and 12600K are the same performance in Borderlands 3, separates between them with a top speed of 2 fps. Both were on the verge of extracting as many fps as possible from the 6900 XT in these test conditions, so needless to say, the performance was excellent.

Go to Watch Dogs: Legion, again we found 5600X and 12600K to be equally matched when playing, this time the Intel processor was 3% faster.

src =

The results for Shadow of the Tomb Raider are more interesting because it is a very compact CPU title and like what we found in F1 2021, the results are mixed 0K was 4% faster than the 5600X when measuring the average rate tires, but 5% slower 1% less. However, the performance was almost the same and you won't even notice a difference between the two CPUs.

src =

Hitman 3 is also strict, but you still have 6 core/12 thread processors from the past few generations, you have more than enough processing power to avoid any stutter at over 100fps for a low rate of 1%. In this case, the 12600K disabled it at 166fps at a low of 1% and an average of 192fps, making it 4% faster than the 5600X.

Basically what we're looking for. This is the solid performance of the single Alder Lake core. The 12600K was 26 percent faster than the 5600X when benchmarking single-core performance on the Cinebench R23, and we see it winning about 20 percent here.

At least for now, most games look like something we see in Horizon Zero Dawn, in other words, there is no difference in game performance between 12600K and 5600X. The 5600X was 5% faster when comparing the average frame rate, but 3% slower for the low 1% rate, so performance is still not noticeable here.

Cyberpunk 2077 is another game The results are mainly limited to GPUs that use the latest generation of AMD and Intel CPUs. In fact, with Intel, you can go several generations to get hexa core / 12 core processors or better. This means that the 12600K and 5600X are comparable in performance, even though the Core i5 offers 8% more performance and 1% less performance.

When it comes to gaming power consumption, there's a lot of slight difference between the 12600K The 5600X is because a Core i5 processor only increased overall system usage by 4%, which is a small difference.The 5600X is equally compatible, with an Intel processor that is 3% faster, so at least when it comes to gaming it doesn't matter which processor you're using, and they both render better Value for players from their own product lines. p>

a Ryzen 5 killer?

A Core i5-12600K processor does, Damn, Alder Lake gets better as we pack the products in. The Core i9-12900K was fine, with the Ryzen 9 5900X and 5950X taking a lot of punch, but it wasn't an obvious choice for either: the Core i7-12700K is a great alternative to the 5800X, It's often my go-to choice due to software performance, which is often more powerful with better gaming results.

The Core i5-12600K continues to do the same, but it does. It's better than its closest competitor 5600X. Worst case, the 12600K engine was slightly faster than the 5600X in single-core and multi-core workloads, but it was often much faster and the performance improvement compensates for the additional power consumption, so the power consumption of 12600K is not an issue.Any cooler can control 11600K or 5800X Works fine on 12600K.


When it comes to gaming, 12600K and 5600X together are compatible, especially in modern games that use a lot of cores. Where 12600K has an edge over older games, or games like Age of Empires 4 that are taxed on a single core — here's the superior performance of single-core Alder Lake on full screen, increasing frame rates by up to 20%. /p>

Looking at the processors, a $320 Core i5-12600K or a $310 Ryzen 5 5600X, there's no way to use AMD. If we are building a completely new system or upgrading our platform. Obviously, if you have a Zen+ or Zen 2 CPU and are looking to boost performance, the 5600X is a good alternative to, say, the lower 5800X or 5900X. But for those just getting started, we're personally shying away from the Zen 3 at current prices.

The only problem with the 12600K right now may be the price of the motherboard. This may shift the value equation in favor of AMD, at least until the arrival of the cheaper 600 Series chips. Currently, the cheapest Z690 board we're considering is the $200 GIGABYTE Z690 UD DDR4, and aside from any actual testing, it's still a bit unknown.

Bazuka The MSI B550M is probably one of the better options for probably $130, but we really like the $150 MSI B550 Tomahawk and think it's worth the extra $20. It also better fits the Gigabyte Z690 UD DDR4. In this example, AMD is $50 cheaper on the motherboard side, which means the 5600X + B550 package is $60 cheaper overall.

This can be used as a hint in favor of AMD in terms of value...kind of. Before the Alder Lake release, I didn't even recommend the 5600X, because $300 isn't worth a lot. In our opinion, now that Intel is in much stronger competition and there are already signs of a price drop, it should be close to $250 or less.

The reason is that if the final value will do, then use. The Core i5-10400F is a $180 solution. Drop it on the $100 MSI Bazooka B560M and you'll get a great gaming collection for less than 5600X. So if you're on a small budget it's as good as it is now, but if you have another $200 to spend on this kit we'll use the base tier with 12,600K on the Z690, or for the cheaper B and H series chipsets. resistance.

Intel put AMD in a tough spot with the launch of Alder Lake, so it will be interesting to see how the red team reacts. Right now, though, the Core i5-12600K is priced at $300.

Intel Core i5-12600K on Amazon Intel Core i7-12700KF on Amazon Intel Core i7-12700K on Amazon Intel Core i9-12900K on Amazon AMD Ryzen 5 5600X on Amazon AMD Ryzen 7 5800X on Amazon AMD Ryzen 9 5900X on Amazon

Intel Core i5-12600K review: 5600X fail
intel-core-i5-12600k-review-5600x.html Apple M1 Pro: SoC review of the best Intel and AMD laptop processors

Apple M1 Pro: SoC review of the best Intel and AMD laptop processors

Today, with an in-depth look at Apple's silicone product, we're taking our standards to places they've never been before. A few weeks ago we bought a ... Forza Horizon 5 مراجعة Review

Forza Horizon 5 مراجعة Review

The implied promise of Forza Horizon is in the name. You see something on the horizon, you can drive towards it. Skyrim by car. Far cry with more cars...