5th generation intel vs 10th generation, but why? If you didn't know that Intel even has a series of fifth-generation desktop processors, you'll forgive, because this device consists of only two parts of the socket, and neither of them, despite the more interesting Intel processors of recent years, did not sell for long. Broadwell was such a big deal that it has now launched Intel's infamous 14nm processor. It was mid-2015, and their new, highly advanced 14nm chip process was a big deal at the time, and we didn't expect them to continue relying on it six years later with their 11th generation Core Series processors.
But it won't last long. Unbelievably, just two months after the release of the Core i7-5775C and Core i5-5675C, both cores were essentially discontinued because Intel moved in with the Skylake-S, pumping out the full 14nm range of Core i7, i5, i3, and Pentium. Kurd. And even Celeron processors. Skylake almost switched to DDR4, while Broadwell components on the Z97 platform were limited to DDR3. Core i7 5775C Core i7 6700K Core i7 8700K Core i7 10700K Core i7 11700K MSRP $366 $339 $359 $374 $399 Release date Jun 2015 Oct 2017 May 2020 March 2021 Core / Threads 4/8 6/12 8/16 Base Frequency 3.30 GHz 4.00 GHz 3.70 GHz 3.80 GHz 3.60 GHz Max 3.70 GHz 4.20 GHz 4.70 GHz 5.10 GHz 5.00 GHz L3 Cache 6 MB 8 MB 8 LGBT1GB1GB1 LGB 95 W 125 W
So, somehow, Broadwell-DT was a failure and ditching expensive Broadwell-E components to boost Intel's HEDT demand. But I think that Broadwell-DT, although limited to just 4 cores, was more interesting than Broadwell-E, while parts like the Core i7-6950X had 10 cores.
This is because Broadwell-DT is what Intel called "Crystal Well", which was code for eDRAM CPUs, and as introduced with Haswell, although only in BGA form. In the case of the 5775C, we received the first Crystal Well socket and received 128MB of eDRAM, which served as an L4 cache. The iGPU was intended to feed more memory bandwidth, improving 3D graphics performance, but if the iGPU is not in use, it can be used by the CPU as additional memory.
We reviewed the Core i7 -5775C in 2015 and found that it can outperform even the best AMD iGPU solutions in gaming, sometimes up to 60%, even though it costs at least three times as much. In fact, the price was always $256 per desktop processor in 2015 with 128MB of internal storage on the package and the 5775C at $366, a price point that would likely compare Intel to $339,770,000 from previous years.
Now, according to all of my recent testing on my 10th Gen Intel Core series comparing the different capacities of the L3 cache with everything else like core number, core frequency, memory frequency, and timings, many wondered if it was It is possible to add a Core i7-5775C to the results.
I was hesitant at first because it's not quite an apple. But given the That we had previously tested a Core i3-10105F at 4.2GHz, I thought it would be a very interesting comparison if I could bring the 5775C up to the same frequency.
Like the Core i3, the 5775C packs a 6MB L3 cache, albeit They had very old cores, but they had 128MB of L4 cache and available when using a Radeon RX 6900 XT cores are put in. So how good is the 5775C and could it be inappropriate for a modern four core like the Core i3-10105F? p> Year of release, microarchitecture mark or process knot Tock 2019 Comet Lake Tock 14nm 2017 Coffee Lake Tock 14nm 2017 Kaby Lake Tock 14nm 2015 Skylake Tock 14nm 2015 Broadwell Tick 14nm 2013 Haswell Tock 22nm 2012 Ivy Bridge Tick 22nm 2011 Sandy Bridge Tock 32nm 2010 Westmere Tick 32nm 2008 Nehalem Tock 45nm 2007 Penryn Tick 45nm 2006 Conroe Tock 65nm
to discover tiles Well, we've implemented a number of benchmarks, but before we get to that, some additional testing tips. First of all, please note that the Core i3-10105F and Core i7-5775C were running on a slower accelerometer compared to the i5, i7 and i9 components. This is because the highest fixed frequency I could get with the 5775C was 4.2GHz and then the 10105F was locked into the 4.2GHz core.
For the 10th generation components, we used the GIGABYTE Z590 Aorus Xtreme. The motherboard I then duplicated three 4.5GHz K-SKU CPUs with 45x bus multiplication and manually initialized the dual channel DDR4-3200 CL14 memory with all the primary, secondary, and tertiary timings. The Core i3-10105F used the same allocated memory, but I couldn't adjust the clock frequency. Core i7-5775C tested on an Asus Z97-Pro motherboard with the latest BIOS and some DDR3. Memory 2400 CL11-13-13-31. We used the RX 6900 XT for testing because the game's fastest GPU is 1080p. Let's review the results. Benchmarks
Starting with Rainbow Six Siege, the two results we want to focus on here are Core i3-10105F and Core i7-5775C. The fifth-generation Core i7 uses DDR3-2400 memory to transfer the 6900 XT at an average of 325 frames per second, which is a significant result considering that the 10105F is only 10% faster and significantly faster than the memory features. It has DDR4 -3200. , with multiple generations of refining and nuclear engineering.
This means that when we match the same number of cores and operating frequency, we are looking to improve IPC by only 10% for Intel in 6 years, when using Rainbow Six Siege as a measuring stick. This is a surprisingly small improvement, as it also includes a memory technology upgrade.
Of course, Intel has added more cores and cache since then, but if we stick to the four core configurations, we see a 10600K 22 faster, a 10700K 31 faster, and 37 faster, and of course these margins increase when all are enabled Cores supported for these partitions.
The Assassin's Creed Valhalla info is very useful because the 10th generation components for all of their GPUs are very limited, and this was not the case with the 5775C, which was averaging 10 frames in second and a 10th-gen Core i3 frame rate of 10 true and 1 low followed by 12 iled. So it's hard to claim real performance based on this data, so let's move on.
Battlefield V's results are interesting because the 5775C wasn't much slower than the 10105F, especially when looking at the lower data1. Compared to the average frame rate, the 5th gen was 1 percent slower. Only 3%, but we did see a 17% bigger drop in 1% performance, and I would say that largely depends on the difference between memory and cache. Bandwidth is something we will look at later.
Moving to F1 2020, the 10th-generation Core i3 doesn't offer as much anti-aging performance as the 5th-generation 5775C. We're looking at an 8% improvement in average frame rate with an 11% increase in low performance by 1%. Here, Intel achieved its greatest performance over the years simply by adding more L3 cache, as seen at 10,600K. This is only a 13 percent increase in performance, but given that the 10105F and 10600K are identical in terms of CPU architecture.
Hitman shows very little progress for Intel in the past six years. The 10th generation Core i3 was only 5% faster than the 5775C and still doubled the L3 cache, resulting in the most performance improvements as the 10600K provides a 9% increase over the 10105F and an 11% increase over the lower performance of 1%. .
Next we have Horizon Zero Dawn and I think the memory bandwidth is great here because the 10th Gen Core i3 was up to 12% faster and 14% faster compared to 1km Low data This is one of the biggest performances we've seen for the 10th generation compared to the 5th generation.
We are also looking for an 11% increase in performance for the 10105F compared to the 5775C, then if we choose the fastest quad-core processor from Intel, 20MB 10900KB with 4 cores Active only, we note that 24 Percentage is faster than the 5775C, so it has acceptable performance, but it's probably a lot less than you'd expect to see after more than half a decade.
Shadow of the Tomb Raider has always been tough on quad cores, even in 8-thread cases, and this is especially true in rural areas. For testing, it is said, with enough cores, the experience can be very good, as shown by the 10600K, 10700K and 10900K quad-core configurations. Then if we look at the 10105F, we see a 16% drop in performance by 1% below 10,600K, while the 5775C is again 12% slower. By comparison, we see that Intel has improved its performance by up to 14% over the past six years, when 1% data was deprecated. Not surprisingly, it's definitely better than any other results we've seen so far.
The last game we're going to talk about is Watch Dogs Legion, here the 10105F was 11 faster than the 5775C for medium frame rates and 17 faster when viewing data 1 a little low. So, again, there is no significant or even significant increase in 6 generations of progression.Cache Bandwidth
Before you finish testing, you'll see your cache bandwidth here. Also note that all 10th generation setups have a memory bandwidth of 38 GB/s. That's 38GB/s of DDR4-3200 memory measured using the SiSoftware Sandra 2021 memory bandwidth test, so AIDA64 doesn't give you higher readability.
I didn't bother with the memory bandwidth scheme, because the 11 tested configurations only give two different results. Again, it's 38GB for 10th-gen components, regardless of model or number of cores. The Core i7-5775C, on the other hand, was limited to 30Gbps with DDR3-2400 memory. This means that the new 10th generation processors have a 27% increase in bandwidth, so there is a huge advantage.
Now, when it comes to cache bandwidth, there are a few things to keep in mind. First, L1 and L2 are cache per core, so bandwidth is multiplied by the number of cores, so we get our best comparison with the four active cores, and here all 10th generation models are pretty much the same. What we can see is that Intel was able to improve L1 broadband bandwidth by up to 11 percent from the 5th to 10th generation architecture, and then increase L2 cache bandwidth by up to 55 percent.
Then we see that compared to 5775C and 10105F, L3 cache bandwidth is improved by 33%. So even though the capacity is the same, the bandwidth has been greatly improved. Models with 39 GB of bandwidth to access system memory are approximately four times slower than the L3 10105F cache. This probably explains why in 2015 it found that the 5775C is only 10% faster than the 4,770K compared to its clock rate in a wide range of application metrics.Conclusion
You are obviously stuck at 14nm. Intel's trend of what appear to be unlimited benefits has been slower than anticipated over the years. In a way, it's great to see how far they've come in the 14nm process, while on the other hand, you'd normally expect to make significant progress in 6 years.
If you had told me in 2015 that by 2021 the latest and greatest Intel processors would be 10% faster in games with the same number of cores and clock speeds, I doubt you would have believed me. Considering that while I was using a GeForce GTX 980 Ti for benchmarking, today's 6900 XT is almost three times faster.
Now, to be fair, Intel has made good strides since the 5th generation Core i7 by adding more cores during the power consumption experience. It increases quickly, as well as performance (and price). Sure, as much as I liked Intel, but the 10900K and/or 11900K are much faster than the 5775C, they also have bigger dies, especially the 11900K, but as we've mentioned several times, it's because they all have the same 14nm process or at least a bit of variety. use it. So that's how the Core i7-5775C compares to more recent 10th-gen models, and we have to say it holds up well, especially when looking at the quad-core bubble. This L4 cache isn't as useful as you might think, at least for CPU performance, although it's certainly very useful for GPU performance, otherwise it's very limited by the bandwidth of the PCI Express 3.0 bus. And I'm doing this for this weird look at the Core i7-5775C. I hope you enjoy this device feature "for science". We will come back for more information. Intel Core i5-11600K on Amazon AMD Ryzen 5 5600X on Amazon Intel Core i7-11700 on Amazon AMD AMD Ryzen 7 5800X on Amazon AMD Ryzen 9 5950X on Amazon GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on Amazon GeForce RTX 3070 Ti on Amazon Radeon RX 6600 XT Amazon
Now, to be fair, Intel has made good strides since the 5th generation Core i7 by adding more cores during the power consumption experience. It increases quickly, as well as performance (and price). Sure, as much as I liked Intel, but the 10900K and/or 11900K are much faster than the 5775C, they also have bigger dies, especially the 11900K, but as we've mentioned several times, it's because they all have the same 14nm process or at least a bit of variety. use it.
So that's how the Core i7-5775C compares to more recent 10th-gen models, and we have to say it holds up well, especially when looking at the quad-core bubble. This L4 cache isn't as useful as you might think, at least for CPU performance, although it's certainly very useful for GPU performance, otherwise it's very limited by the bandwidth of the PCI Express 3.0 bus.
And I'm doing this for this weird look at the Core i7-5775C. I hope you enjoy this device feature "for science". We will come back for more information. Intel Core i5-11600K on Amazon AMD Ryzen 5 5600X on Amazon Intel Core i7-11700 on Amazon AMD AMD Ryzen 7 5800X on Amazon AMD Ryzen 9 5950X on Amazon GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on Amazon GeForce RTX 3070 Ti on Amazon Radeon RX 6600 XT Amazon
Intel 5th Generation Infrastructure vs. 10th Generation Standard Infrastructure