Best Value CPU Battle: Core i5-12400 vs. Ryzen 5 5600X

Shopping Shortcuts:

In our Core i5-12400 review, there's nothing on paper that tells you this could be an amazing CPU. However, that's often the 12,600K discount we've already seen. However, in my opinion, this is one of the most exciting CPUs released in recent years.

Compared to the Core i5-12600K, the four cores, the L3 cache, are gone. It was reduced from 20 MB to 18 MB, the turbo clock speed was reduced by 10% and the Core power was reduced from 125 watts to just 65 watts. It's not terribly fun, but it can be seen oddly enough, price i5-12400. Ryzen is AMD. The Model 5 5600X and i5-12400 are just $210 and the F-SKU is just $180. That's 40% less than the 5600X, and 25% less than the 5600G, which is relatively unattractive.

src =

In most cases, especially games, it shouldn't be 12400 compared to 12600K, it's much slower, and if so, the priced gamers They pay close attention.

What you get for about $200 is a P-6.12-core Alder Lake CPU up to 4.4GHz with 18MB L3 cache and 730 UHD graphics.So It should be faster than the previous generation Core i5-11600K, which a year ago was $270.

Now, before standards allow us specifying the test system specs. We haven't done any DDR5 tests for this because it seems like a waste of time at the moment, and Also in terms of performance of DDR4 vs. DDR5 (41 games with our great features) or we're moving to Core, all you have to do. Act. See the i9-12900K, which tests both memory and related motherboards.

Intel Core i9 12900K Intel Core i7 12700K Intel Core i5 12600K Intel Core i5 12600K Intel Core i5 12600 Intel Core i5 12400 MSRP $22 $4,320. 2022 Core / Series 16/24 12/20 10/16 6/12 Base Frequency 2.4 / 3.4 GHz 2.7 / 3.6 GHz 2.8 / 3.7 GHz 3.3 GHz .8 GHz .8 GHz .8 GHz .8 GHz / Max 5 GHz 4.4 GHz L3 Cache 30 MB 25 MB 20 MB 18 MB Memory DDR5-4800 / DDR4-3200 Socket LGA 1700

For the Core i5-12400 test we have the MSI B660M Mortar Wi-Fi DDR4 with 32 GB Dual Channel Memory and DDR4 - 3200 We use CL14 - the same thing we use in all of our DDR4 tests - and it's usually faster in performance than CL18 single-level memory DDR4-3800.

K-SKU Alder CPUs Lake tested same memory on MSI Z690 Tomahawk Wi-Fi DDR4. All boards have been updated to the latest BIOS version. We've also updated our Ryzen data with the MSI X570S Tomahawk Wi-Fi motherboard.

src =

All game data for AM4 and LGA 1700 processors were updated with a scalable active band. The plan was to do the same with 10th and 11th generation Intel processors, But performance was reversed in all cases by enabling ReBAR, so we have now disabled this feature on PCI Express on those platforms.

Starting with the multi-core results for the Cinebench R23, we find that 12400 is good for over 12,000 points, and when you follow the 65W specification, it's only 3 percent slower. In this case, it is unbelievable to see that 12400 with base specification 11600K won 8% and 10600K won 32%.

Best CPU Battle for Value: Core i5-12400 vs. Ryzen 5 5600X "

Perhaps most impressive was the 9% difference that defeated the 5600X. Not particularly good for AMD, which was 30% slower than 12600K in the end, partly due to a 10% drop in frequency with 4 E cores removed and L3 cache capacity reduced by 10%. <b>Best</b> <b>Value</b> <b>Battle</b> CPU: <b>Core</b> <b>i5-12400</b> <b>vs.</b> <b>Ryzen</b> 5 5600X <b>Battle</b> for the <b>Best</b> <b>Value</b> CPU: <b>Core</b> <b>i5-12400</b> <b>vs.</b> <b>Ryzen</b> 5 5600X

Moving to 7-Zip, 12400 is less impressive, although it could be a bit moving away from 11600K. This is a good result. Compared to the 5600X, it was 12% slower and 13% slower than the 12,600K, although for the price difference, this is a good result for a locked Core i5.

Unfortunately, it's also not good for testing Lower the pressure, because 12400 can only outperform 10600K, by a margin of 12% slower than 11600K and about 30% slower than 5600X. <b>Best</b> <b>Value</b> <b>Battle</b> CPU: <b>Core</b> <b>i5-12400</b> <b>vs.</b> <b>Ryzen</b> 5 5600X < /p>

The Core i5-12400 Powerless Runtime Power was good for 667 points. Adobe Premiere Pro standard, which means it can match the 10700K 8-core / 16-thread, while outperforming the 5600X by 8%.

Then when power is limited to the 65W spec compared to the 5600X released that makes it 8% slower than the -12400 released configuration versus the Ryzen 5 5600X ">

Adobe Photoshop Not an implementation of the kernel, so both i5-12400 configurations give roughly the same result, meaning that no matter how you cut it, a closed Core i5 is as powerful as the Ryzen 5 5600X, while the 12600K is 11% higher, resulting in 11 percent faster. % in this test. <b>Best</b> <b>Value</b> <b>CPU</b> Battle: <b>Core</b> <b>i5-12400</b> <b>vs.</b> <b>Ryzen</b> 5 <b>5600X</b> 5600X and 6% faster than the previous generation's 11600K.

“https://safirsoft.Best CPU Battle Value: Core i5-12400 vs Ryzen 5 5600X This metric automatically calculates the time it takes to run 1,000 upgrades. This is a one-string test that appears to be highly dependent on cache performance.

Since this game has only one powerful core, the power configuration doesn't matter and allows 12400 to generate a score of 202. Even when you stick to the 65W spec, that's the same result you get from a Zen 3 processor, and Only 2.5% is less than 12600 K. <b>Best</b> <b>CPU</b> <b>Battle</b> Value: <b>Core</b> <b>i5-12400</b> <b>vs.</b> <b>Ryzen</b> 5 <b>5600X</b>

When it comes to code performance compilation, the 12400 is a beast that completes our testing in 6070 seconds and lets us do just that. 24% faster than the 5600X and 13% faster than actually, it was only 8% slower than the 5800X, despite 21% slower than the 12600K. <b>Best</b> <b>Battle</b> <b>Value</b> for CPU: <b>Core</b> <b>i5-12400</b> <b>vs.</b> <b>Ryzen</b> 5 <b>5600X</b> < /p>

The last program we want to look at is Blender, with 12400 just getting out. 5600X while compatible with 11600K. This is a good performance for the 6-core / 12-string in this program. Game Criteria

Now it's time to review some of the game benchmarks, starting with F1 2021 and second with a preset quality we're using at 1080p. and a Radeon 6900 XT.

The Core i5-12400 matches the 11600K and 10700K here, making it 9% slower than the 12900K and 15% slower than the 5600X. This might seem a little disappointing at first, but keep in mind that the 12400 is 30% smaller than the 5600X, so it's still a great value.

< /p>

Next up, Rainbow Six Siege, here 12400 was a little faster. Compared to the 11700K, 10700K, and 3700X models, that makes them only 8% slower than the 12600K. This makes it slightly slower than the 5600X, even 17% or 19% slower if we compare numbers under 1%. But overall, we're seeing a solid 12,400 performance and great cost-per-frame results.

https: / <b>Best</b> <b>CPU</b> <b>Battle</b> with Value: <b>Core</b> <b>i5-12400</b> <b>vs.</b> <b>Ryzen</b> 5 <b>5600X</b> < /p>

The Watch Dogs Legion data is more competitive than the more expensive 5600X. The i5-12400 was less than 3% slower, which is basically the same level of performance as the 12600K and 11700K. Strong score for Core i5 processor locked in this game. <b>Best</b> <b>Battle</b> <b>Value</b> CPU: <b>Core</b> <b>i5-12400</b> <b>vs.</b> <b>Ryzen</b> 5 5600X p>

For the first time, the i5-12400 can surpass the 5600X in the game. As we saw in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, while the average frame rate was very similar, the Core i5 was 9% faster on the lower 1% data.

It was also only 4% slower than 12600K. And 26% faster than the previous generation 11,600 thousand. It's also worth noting that running at 65W has little effect on performance. <b>Best</b> <b>Battle</b> <b>Value</b> CPU: <b>Core</b> <b>i5-12400</b> <b>vs.</b> Intel <b>Ryzen</b> 5 <b>5600X</b>

You have a serious performance advantage in The Riftbreaker. The i5-12400 processor easily outperforms the 5600X and delivers up to 26% better performance, which appears as low as 1%. Also, it was only a few frames slower than 12600K and 13% faster than 11600K. <b>Best</b> <b>Value</b> <b>Battle</b> for CPU: <b>Core</b> <b>i5-12400</b> <b>vs.</b> <b>Ryzen</b> 5 5600X p>

Interestingly enough, the 12400 was significantly slower than our 12600K on the Hitman 3 benchmark and was 18% behind the margins.

The Core i5 lock has 10% less and 10% less L3 cache, so under certain conditions it may be about 18% slower. Here, compared to components like the 12600K and 5600X, the result isn't great, despite the good overall performance. <b>Best</b> <b>Value</b> <b>Battle</b> for CPU: <b>Core</b> <b>i5-12400</b> <b>vs.</b> <b>Ryzen</b> 5 <b>5600X</b> 12600K follows. Frame rate and 22% down 1%.This also means that it was up to 16% slower than the 5600X.</p> <p> Compared to previous generations, it was approximately 11700K and slightly faster than 11600K, which was a performance Great in that regard.. </p> <p> <img src =

The i5-12400 performed much better on Far Cry 6, at least compared to the 5600X because it was up to 10% faster, beating even the 5800X and the 11700K.

The slower By up to 15% from 12,600K when looking at the lowest 1%. Overall a good result here for the new Intel Core i5 processor. <b>Best</b> <b>CPU</b> <b>Battle</b> Value: <b>Core</b> <b>i5-12400</b> <b>vs.</b> <b>Ryzen</b> 5 <b>5600X</b>

Horizon Zero Dawn results For 12400 it's not very good. This means that it should be noted that if we want to use the final quality of the game, the GPU is quite limited and this normalizes the performance of the CPU, seeing 5600X and 12400 compatibility, even with the 6900 XT at 1080p. But with the "optimal quality" visual preset, the game is much more CPU-limited in our test conditions, 5600 times faster up to 21% with 12600K 17% faster. <b>Best</b> <b>CPU</b> <b>Battle</b> Worth: <b>Core</b> <b>i5-12400</b> <b>vs.</b> <b>Ryzen</b> 5 5600X

Finally we have our Cyberpunk 2077 and this game basically has a GPU, even with the small quality settings we use here. The 12400 was able to move a few frames before the 5600X while it was only 4% behind the 12600K. Power consumption

But a big improvement over the eleventh generation. For the same level of performance, the Core i5-12400 reduced total system consumption by 28%... This is the total power consumption of the system, not just CPU power.

The savings are enormous, and Alder is dedicated. For this comparison, it roughly equals Zen 3. <b>Best</b> <b>CPU</b> <b>Battle</b> with value: <b>Core</b> i5 -12400 <b>vs.</b> <b>Ryzen</b> 5 <b>5600X</b> <b>Best</b> <b>Value</b> <b>CPU</b> Battle: <b>Core</b> i5 - 12400 at It's actually quite affordable compared to the <b>Ryzen</b> 5 <b>5600X</b>

12400 and uses 20 watts less than the 5600X for the same level of performance as Cyberpunk. It also reduced total system usage by 8% compared to the previous generation Core i5-11600K.

10 average game

Looking at the average of 10 games, you can see Core i5-12400. No power limit and a versatile liquid cooler that's no faster than 65W specification with a box cooler. We are talking about a difference of less than 2% on average.

Compared to the 5600X, the i5-12400 processor was on average 6% slower and 8% slower than the 12600K. Given the cost savings, this makes 12400 a great deal for gamers. <b>Best</b> <b>CPU</b> Battle: <b>Core</b> <b>i5-12400</b> <b>vs.</b> In a short time, the <b>CPU</b> is working <b>CPU</b> is in PL2 mode, which makes the package power up to 75W, the <b>CPU</b> temperature peaks at 80 °C, but in most of these tests, the power is based on 65W, where the power is limited RM1 coolant can maintain On the <b>CPU</b> alone it's at 75°C, so this little cooler runs well enough on a 65W spec.</p> <p>During testing the Cinebench R23 pressure, the entire nuclear frequency on the PL1 model was between 3.7 and 3.8 GHz.</p> <p> p> <p> <img border =

If we remove the power limits with the RM1 cooler, it maintains a frequency of 12400GHz-5 for all cores. - 8% increase in frequency there - and the temperature reached 82 ° C, but the RM1 is now much higher, which is not an ideal solution, although it works.

Replacing the RM1 with a Corsair iCUE H100i Elite Capellix stopped running all 4GHz cores, with temperatures reaching only 54°C to peak, even though temperatures were regularly below 50°C . This is a very large solution for such a CPU. A lightweight $20 tower air cooler would work just fine, but since we had already installed the H100i in our test system, we got going just as easily.

What we learned

Core i5-12400 works, and ideally we'd like some extra processors like Core i5-10400, 11400 and Ryzen 5 5600G, but time constraints with more hardware testing for future revisions don't allow for an update All this data. After adding this with all the graphs we were able to run some additional testing, so here's a quick look at the data: 12400 is on average 17% faster than the 5600G and 14% faster than the 11400F.

It is interesting to note that while 11600K is only 4% faster than 11400 on average, 12600K is 9% faster than 12400. Even if 11400 and 11600K show the same clock frequency difference with 12-. Both chips have 12MB of L3 cache, and we know many games are cache sensitive, which explains the difference in margins between generations. <b>Best</b> <b>Value</b> <b>CPU</b> Battle: <b>Core</b> <b>i5-12400</b> <b>vs.</b> <b>Ryzen</b> 5 <b>5600X</b>

Then when the game benchmarks AMD and Intel processors really deal with the games being used and how those games are tested. In our relatively small typical games, the 5600X had big wins in Horizon Zero Dawn, Hitman 3, Rainbow Six Siege, Age of Empires 4 and a good win in F1 2021, while the i5-12400 was stronger in Far Cry 6. and Riftbreaker.

It also depends on how you test these games. Horizon Zero Dawn, for example, uses final quality settings to completely limit the game's GPU, which is equivalent to CPU performance, matching the 5600X and 12400, even with the 6900 XT at 1080p.

In this market segment, I personally like the value, because if you have a higher performance use a more expensive CPU like a Core i7-12700K or a Ryzen 5 mic. 5800X.

However, when it comes to value, Intel now easily uses AMD. The 12400F is currently $180, and while the B660 motherboard options are currently limited, we can expect some great boards to be available for around $160. <b>Best</b> <b>CPU</b> <b>Battle</b> by Value: <b>Core</b> <b>i5-12400</b> <b>vs.</b> <b>Ryzen</b> 5 <b>5600X</b>

5600X with a good B550 board still fetches you about $430, while you wait for the 12400F price on a decent B660 around $340 dollars. This is a huge savings for a similar gaming experience.

If you want a great budget AMD with 6 cores, you can get the MSI B550M-A Pro for $95 and pair it up. With the 5600G priced at $240, that's a total of $335, which is basically what you're paying for a faster, higher-quality i5-12400 mix. Of course, there will be cheap and bad B660 boards too, so costs can be lowered even further with Alder Lake, which means Intel is winning the budget war no matter where it goes.

Core i5. The -12400F is my new, low-cost CPU and we hope to see some cheap B660 boards available soon!

Intel Core i5-12400 on Amazon Intel Core i5-12400F on Amazon Intel Core i5-12600K Amazon Intel Core i7-12700K on Amazon AMD Ryzen 7 5800X on Amazon MSI Z690 Tomahawk WiFi DDR4 on Amazon MSI Z690-A Pro WiFi DDR4 on Amazon Asus Prime Z690-P D4 on Amazon MSI X570S Tomahawk WiFi on Amazon MSI B550M-A Pro