AMD Radeon RX 6600 review: The best choice in bad conditions?

Shopping Shortcuts:

AMD launches the new Radeon RX 6000 series, the RX 6600, which we're reviewing today. A couple of months ago, the RX 6600 XT was well received because it didn't bring much to the table, the MSRP was a bit high, even if it doesn't make sense these days, and the performance was great.

However, one thing will be the price list and the assumed role of the GPU in the market, and another in the current (unusually bloated) GPU market. And so, thanks to its convenient availability, the Radeon 6600 XT was one of the best options we've seen in the last year or so for a new graphics card. AMD Radeon RX 6600 review: Best choice in bad conditions?

A GPU price update last month showed that the 6600 XT sells for an average of $640 on eBay, while the slightly slower RTX 3060 sells for $710. This price is about the same today.

eBay MSRP July Average Price August eBay Average September September Current Price Inflation Price Increases August-September Radeon 6900 XT $1,000 $1,460 $1,622 $1,569 $5,769 -3% Radeon 6800 XT 650 $1,282 $1,268 $1,411 117% 11% Radeon $6800 580 $1,087 $1,127 $1,309 126% 16% Radeon 6700 XT $480 $733 $793 $881 83% 11% Radeon RX 6600 $380,633 $639 68% 68% 1 Medium 90% 7%

% More vanilla Radeon RX 6600 will be available at launch, so it's not Only more chances to buy it, but I hope you can do it at a reasonable price. This is promising, though it's not clear yet, but we'll keep that in mind when reviewing the RX 6600.

src= AMD Radeon RX 6600 review: Best option in bad conditions for good Fortunately, AMD did not reduce its memory capacity, leaving the RX 6600 at 8 GB. However, reducing core and memory frequencies reduced the range from 160 W to 132 W. Finally, like the 6600 XT, the non-XT version is limited to PCIe bandwidth. 4.0 x8.Therefore, this is not a problem when installing on PCIe 4.0, but performance issues may occur when installing on a system that only supports PCIe 3.0, which most systems currently have.</p> <p> This is because when using PCIe 4.0, The RX 6600 series connects to the CPU using a 16Gbps connection, which is enough for modern graphics cards because that's all about PCIe.You get 3.0 x16.However, when limited to the x8 interface, the bandwidth of PCIe 3.0 is reduced. to 8 gigabit in Only the second, and we have seen in the past that this can severely limit performance, especially when removing data from system memory. </p> <p> <img border =

I did this with the 6600 XT and only found one game where bandwidth limitation became an issue, and even then, it could be resolved. However, my concern is that this limitation will hinder Its future is ugly and may cause the RX 6600 series not to grow as old as Nvidia's competition RTX 3060 series, but of course, that's what we need to do. Let's do some research. The future.

In today's test, we have the Gigabyte Eagle RX 6600 As with the XT version, AMD has not developed a reference card, although there is a free reference PCB design for use with AIB partners. AMD Radeon RX 6600 review: Best option in bad conditions? “In total, we tested 12 games in 1080p and 1440p resolution using the Ryzen 9 5950X test system, which is configured with 32GB of dual-core and dual-core DDR4-3200 CL14 memory. Since the 6600 is very similar in design to the 6600 XT, we We take the time to analyze a few games and then look at the average performance in each of the 12 games. Let's get to the results... </ p> Benchmarks <p> Starting in F1 2020, we find the results that can best be expected , with the new RX 6600 13% slower than the XT model, averaging 141 fps bright. It performs extremely well in 1080p, although the RX 6600 only matches the 5600 XT, which will irritate many of you without Doubt, considering that this product had an MSRP of $280 in early 2020. However, when focusing on current generation products, it was at least compatible with the RTX 3060.</p> < p> <img alt =

Moving on to Cyberpunk 2077, we're having trouble with the RX 6600 even at 1080p at 60fps, although I think given the 6600 XT Rendered 69 was expected That frames per second slows down the new version by 13%.

Once again, we're looking at 5600 XTs with similar performance to the new RX 6600, even though we're comparing two different generations of GPUs sold on two machines. So different markets, it's still hard not to be disappointed with this outcome. We will discuss that later.

Increasing the resolution to 1440p when running Cyberpunk 2077 is not an option because it reduces the average frame rate to 35 fps and we've already adjusted the quality we're using.

Death Stranding 6600 is more friendly as it allows 135fps at 1080p using the highest quality preset in the game. In fact, this was a much better result than other AMD GPUs we've seen before, with the RX 6600 being able to match the RX 5700 this time around and being slightly faster than the RTX 3060. Not bad considering that it's 15% slower than the 6600 XT.

1440p is available here at 95 fps, although that means the 6600 was 18% slower than the XT version. That means we're once again reviewing the performance of the 5600 XT, which is a bit unlikely if I'm being honest.

Next we have the Horizon Zero Dawn and this time the RX 6600 is compatible with the 2060 Super and 2070, so it was great in that respect, although it was only 6 that was faster than the 5600 XT , which means that at 1440p they offer the same level of performance.

With the RX 6600, which drives just 56% of the XT at an average of 64 fps, it's also 15% slower than the 6600 XT and 7% slower than the RX 5700.

This margin drops to 3% at 1440p, although it's still 12% slower than the XT. Very similar to what we've seen in other titles.

Sum up individual benchmarks with Watch Dogs Legion. 1080p data shows the 6600 is 10% slower than the XT, which is a good result and means that the RX 6600 was able to match the RTX 3060, 2070 and 2060 Super.

< /p>

The 1440p results are very similar, the 6600 lags 12% behind the XT, but still matches the RX 5700 and RTX 2060 Super. Power consumption

When it comes to power consumption, the RX 6600 is slightly better than the 5600 XT. We're talking about a small 26W drop in system usage overall for about the same performance, although it was much better than the RTX 3060.

Performance Summary

Radeon RX 6600 No "No surprises to us because its performance compared to the new model XT released two months ago was as expected and very linear. Let's check the average performance, let's look at twelve examples from games...

At 1080p, the RX 6600 is on average 14% slower than the XT version, which corresponds to a lower price tag. The performance of the RX 5700 or RTX 2070 is good Overall, but poorly developed.

The 1440p results are a bit less desirable, and while the RX 6600 was still 14% slower than the XT version, it's currently only compatible with the RTX 2060 Super and Faster than the 5600 XT.

What we've learned

So there you have it, this is the Radeon RX 6600. Now, why would we use it? It's hard, the RX 6600 is clearly on its way and will only be announced in the coming weeks based on street pricing and availability We've put our ears to the ground and told retailers that availability at least compares to other recent versions Be very strong. If they're right, we should see more 6600 XT versions, so that's a potential positive.


Unfortunately, cryptocurrency miners now seem to be ramping up their RDNA2 GPUs, and in some places the price has gone up to 6600 XT, which may be the case for most models along the lines of the XT launch, where you can expect A reasonable starting stock similar to an MSRP of a few days, which is quickly depleted and never seen again.

Back to the performance of the Radeon RX 6600. Certainly in a typical market there is no denying that this product is ridiculous. 6% performance at 1440p But today, the RX 6600 could be the most affordable current generation graphics card you can buy, so it's there.

The best option in bad conditions is the best way to describe the Radeon is the RX 6600, so let's put it aside for now. AMD Radeon RX 6600 review: B is the best choice in bad conditions?

You're probably running a faster or closer GPU, so it wouldn't be worth the upgrade. So the RX 6600 is more of an option for those without an alternative. You want to play now and you can't, so the RX 6600 may be a very cost-effective way to play.

In the end, the Radeon RX 6600 is just like the 6600 XT, the thruster product that tastes so good with the current climate, it's currently not recommended to recommend any graphics card, especially if it's not a good value in the regular market or is close to remote And, in that case, if it's not needed, at the moment you shouldn't buy a graphics card, but if you do, the 6600 is probably a good choice.

Radeon RX 6600 on Amazon Radeon RX 6600 XT on Amazon GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on Amazon GeForce RTX 3060 on Amazon GeForce RTX 3070 Ti on Amazon Radeon RX 6800 on Amazon Ryzen 5 5600X on Amazon Ryzen 9 5950X on Amazon

AMD Radeon RX 6600 review: The best choice in bad conditions?