Apple called for cooperation with competitors after they claimed they were monitoring journalists and activists
AI, which analyzed dozens of smartphones targeted by NSO customers, said Apple's marketing claims about the superior security and privacy of its devices by discovering vulnerabilities even in the latest iPhone versions. The iOS app has "lost". "Thousands of iPhones are potentially at risk," said Dana Ingleton, vice president of technology at AI. "This is a global concern - anyone and everyone is at risk, and even tech giants like Apple are not equipped to deal with the widespread surveillance available." "Unfortunately Apple is doing poorly on this partnership. In cooperation with other technology companies," said Aaron Cockrell, chief strategist at Lookout. Work with other technology companies to solve a problem. mobile security provider. He called iOS a "black box" compared to Google's Android, saying it was "much easier to detect malicious behavior." Amnesty is working with the nonprofit journalism group Forbidden Stories and 17 media partners of the Pegasus Project to identify alleged censorship targets. NSO, which said its technology is only designed to target suspected criminals or terrorists, called Project Pegasus' claims "false and misleading." Unconfirmed hypotheses and theories. No need to unlock the user. Link.
The AI results flash "five important alarms with iMessage Security"
Bill Markzak, research fellow at Citizen Lab, a nonprofit group that has documented NSO tactics extensively, said
A similar type of zero-click Pegasus attack was discovered in 2019 using WhatsApp messenger from Facebook.WhatsApp CEO Cutkart described the latest information as a "wake-up call to internet security." In a series of tweets, he referred to actions taken by tech companies including Google, Microsoft and Cisco that worked against Pegasus and other commercial spying tools to roll back. p>
But Apple, with whom Facebook has long been a friend, there were no serious disagreements about the iPhone privacy controls on its list of partners.
“We need more companies and governments to take serious action to hold the NSO accountable,” Catcart said, while Apple protects labor consumers. "She does a great job," says Lookout's Cockerill. “To protect against attacks like Pegasus, we need to do more with companies like me.” "The big difference between Apple and Google is transparency," Cockrell said. "Apple has insisted on working with foreign security researchers, but prefers activities that involve paying millions." The dollar is intended for "security" annually, not advertised. "For more than a decade, Apple has led the industry in security innovation, and as a result, security researchers agree that the iPhone is the most secure and secure mobile device on the market," Apple said in a statement. "Attacks like the ones described are very complex, cost millions of dollars to build, are often short-lived and are used to target specific people," Apple said. “While this means that they do not pose a threat to the vast majority of our users, we continue to work tirelessly to protect all of our customers and are constantly adding new protections to their devices and data.” p>
© 2021 The Financial Times Ltd. All rights reserved, may not be distributed, copied or modified in any way. p>
Apple put pressure on iPhone security after NSO spy allegations
A British government agency is concerned that Space...
We've spent the past few weeks burning large amounts of AWS computing time tr...
The shadowy world of private spyware has long sounded t...
We are now in the third phase of machine learning projects - that...