what happened? Google filed its fourth antitrust lawsuit, which was filed a year later by US attorneys general in 36 states and territories against the Play Store over anti-competitive actions. In response, Google said the suit was inappropriate because Android allows downloading apps from competing stores or directly from the developer's website unlike iOS.
Google has recently come under fire for antitrust lawsuits by the US and European governments. The latest case, which was filed on Wednesday, alleges that Google is making it difficult for app developers to distribute its Android apps anywhere other than the Play Store. This ensures that Google receives 30% of the in-app purchase fee. The developers also said they were forced to use the Play Store because Google is "targeting potentially competitive app stores".
In addition, the lawsuit alleges that Google has entered into or entered into agreements with phone makers such as Samsung and Network. Operators like Verizon already download their apps to their devices and don't open competing app stores. It also claims that Google is trying to keep users away from other stores by warning them about malware - not that the Play Store is free of it. "Once again, we see Google suppressing competition and profits in the billions from its dominance for illegal use," New York Attorney General Letia James said in a statement. “The company has ensured through its illegal behavior that hundreds of millions of Android users turn to Google and only Google for millions of apps they may choose to download on their phones and tablets. Worse, Google Hayat” is putting pressure on millions of small users and companies just looking about the competition. We demand an end to Google's illegal monopoly and eventually give millions of customers and business owners a voice. "p>
Google says its costs are comparable to other stores
Google sent in response the ability to download apps and the fact that many Android devices have my device or the number of preloaded app stores, it doesn't consider this dress worthy. If you don't find the app you're looking for on Google Play, you can download the app from a competitor's app store or directly from the developer's website. We don't apply the same restrictions as other mobile operating systems."
"So it's strange that a group of prosecutors preferred to sue to attack a system that offers more openness and choice than others. Big app provider Epic Games is set to mimic its benefit from Opening up Android by distributing the Fortnite app outside of Google Play."
Google also notes that it offers Android devices like the Amazon Fire tablet to preload from a competitor's app store without the Google Play Store.
"This lawsuit is not about helping a young child or protecting consumers. It's about strengthening the group of app developers who claim the benefits of Google Play at no cost." “Doing so increases costs for small developers, hampers their ability to innovate and compete, and makes apps less secure for Android consumers.”
Google says new antitrust lawsuit targeting Play Store is worthless because Android has sideloading