Apple can still reconsider the ruling before it goes into effect on December 9.
In September, US District Judge Evan Gonzalez Rogers ruled that Apple should allow iOS developers to allow users direct external content purchase mechanisms. In-app purchases in the Store. On Tuesday night, Rogers denied Apple's request to uphold the ruling, paving the way for its implementation on December 9 pending further review. p>
READ MORE Apple tries to block Epic from winning before it takes effect December 9 In a candid four-page sentence, Judge Rogers said Apple's request for suspension, which was filed last month, is "fundamentally incomplete" And the "Based". “Selective reading ignores the findings of this court and all findings supporting the ruling, i.e. primary antitrust practices, including highly competitive commission rates, which result in extremely high operating margins and are unrelated to the value of intellectual property.” “One of the key rules that Apple has been able to successfully attach to highly competitive commissions associated with its intellectual property, Judge Rogers wrote, is that the rules reduce the rate of equity for the Unreal Epic engine in particular, and persist” in the industry in general.
Judge Rogers also rejected Apple's argument that allowing links and 'metadata' for alternative payments would be 'overkill'. Irreparable harm... in the form of a loss of trust and integrity in the iOS ecosystem. It refers to other exceptions, such as the Reader and Shared View rule, which “can consider alternatives outside the program.”
Follow the order and at the same time take the necessary steps to do so. Protect users, as long as Apple truly believes that external links causing problems.” “Consumers are quite accustomed to linking from one application to another in a web browser.” “Aside from the time it takes to create the instructions, Apple has not presented any credible evidence to the court that the ruling could cause obvious harm.” Mark Perry said , Apple's attorney, in oral argument. Rather than asking for additional time to comply, Judge Rogers notes, however, that Apple "wants to stay indefinitely without having to try to comply. Time to damage is not irreparable." p>
According to Rogers' original request, purchases made directly within iOS apps themselves must use Apple's in-app payment system, as provided in the Apple Developer Agreement." This gives Apple writes: "It's a distinct advantage. It's a safer or a better option. The fact remains: it is their choice. Consumer information, transparency, and consumer choice are in the public interest.”
ReadingApple Video and music allows — but not games — to link other payment options Apple will likely take the opportunity to appeal the ruling to the Ninth Court of Appeals before Goes into effect Dec. 9. "External payment link rules" for many non-game apps The company has also agreed to allow developers to email customers about external payment methods as part of a separate class dispute resolution iOS App Store and Epic Games developer accounts ban iOS indefinitely, even while Epic is undergoing its legal review process, this part of the ruling comes into effect. And it will remain so.
Judge rejects Apple's arguments for delaying needed changes to the iOS App Store